• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama-mask clown gets lifetime Missouri fair ban. Just, or too harsh?[W:395]

obvious Child said:
Okay, so you'd be okay with having state events when entertainers said that we should string up Republican Politicians and whip them? I'm guessing no. But that's because you're a partisan hack. Some of us still think that civil society should be civil. Your side does not.
Click to expand...

Anyone else enjoying the irony here??
 
obvious Child said:
Uh, all that post says is what the bull thinks is irrelevant. You were the one that argued the point about what the bull thinks is relevant.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...air-ban-just-too-harsh-32.html#post1062199856

Jesus Christ the quality of new users here is appalling. This site should enact a basic intelligence test.



HOpe you enjoy your infractions.

Obama Jokes - Funny Barack Obama Jokes and Obama Humor
Political Gag Gifts | Stupid.com

How many of those made the news?
Click to expand...


LOL. I'm glad to be back to get some laughs at your expense.

Please explain how you type out "It is irrelevant what a bull thinks" and not believe a bull actually thinks? This ought to be good. And for the record, no need to tell lies about me, I wouldn't say what a bull thinks is relevant or irrelevant. Are you smart enough to know why? At this point, I'm betting no.

Where's the news articles? LOL. They didn't make it.
 
Politicizing everything gets tiresome. The clown was making a political statement where people go to get away from it. I don't know if he deserved the punishment he got, but they should let him back if he promises not to do it again. But really, who would recognize him if he did come back except people who knew him personally?
 
Moot said:
Politicizing everything gets tiresome. The clown was making a political statement where people go to get away from it. I don't know if he deserved the punishment he got, but they should let him back if he promises not to do it again. But really, who would recognize him if he did come back except people who knew him personally?
Click to expand...

Let him back if never makes fun of BHO ever again?

This is getting Albanian.
 
Surtr said:
The First Amendment protects you from prosecution under law. It doesn't grant immunity from the consequences of pissing off the people who sign your checks.
Click to expand...
How would the clown know that they would get upset with jokes about the President? It happens all the time at rodeos all around the country.

Maybe they should have made it clear that there were no Obama jokes allowed.
 
obvious Child said:
To which their dummies are representatives of the actual person. Are you still going to deny this?



So he's my man despite me not voting for him and me calling him repeatedly Bush's 3rd and 4th term, a president I largely hold in contempt? Do you want to keep destroying whatever credibility you have? Man, I know where it put this little gem. And I get the joke. I find it offensive for an entertaining at a state fair to suggest that the President should be seriously injured or killed. What you fail (and the rest of your lot) to realize is that other rodeos just bring the gag out. They don't rile up the crowd the same way this guy did. You are dishonestly trying to cast them all as the same.



Yeah, they do.



And relevance how? The actual method of doing damage is quite irrelevant here. The fact that the clown suggested at all that the President should be injured or killed is the problem.



Uh yeah. The only people backing you are the only people who can't win an argument against me.
Click to expand...


LOL.

More absurdity.

Everyone at the rodeo (and others just like it) are smart enough to know that the clown and the bull are performing the skit with a dummy. It's apparent, there is a few humans without the mental capacity to recognize the difference between dummies, real life and real people and understand the skit is a joke. It's easy to see which group you fit into.

The clown never suggested Obama the real life president be run over by a bull. The clown suggested Obama, the dummy, get run over by a bull. Kids of all ages at rodeos understand this when they see this skit. That's why they laugh. Same with Adults, exceptions being the recent brain dead. Ask yourself why you can't separate fact from fiction because I don't know why.

As far as who is backing me, I don't know who is backing me. Other than people with common sense. That counts you out. And for the record, unless in a court room and a judge slams the gavel down, nobody ever wins an argument.
 
Moot said:
Politicizing everything gets tiresome. The clown was making a political statement where people go to get away from it. I don't know if he deserved the punishment he got, but they should let him back if he promises not to do it again. But really, who would recognize him if he did come back except people who knew him personally?
Click to expand...

Absolutely correct.

I still don't understand why so many think you should be allowed to do anything you want on the company clock. I suppose many feel that an employer can't tell employees to put away their cell phones and violate their civil rights.

At my workplace I do not discuss politics, race , and religion with clients. The client are free to tell me what ever is on their mind but I keep my opinion to myself.

Even being an agnostic if a client tells me god bless you I say thank you, I mean what can it hurt.
 
Grant said:
You can relax. The President was not there and the rodeo clown was referring to a dummy.

Or is that your point?

You see the US President was not really there. It was just a mask. There was a dummy. It wasn't really President Barrack Obama. It was all pretend. It was a joke. Entertainers sometimes make political jokes. There was no conspiracy by the clown or anyone else to kill or maim the President. The real BHO was not at the rodeo.

Maybe someone else can explain this better.

Yes, you are formidable.
Click to expand...

Glad to see you stand with the group of people who think civil society shouldn't be civil.

Again, no one ever argued it was actually Obama. Why is that so hard for people to get through their brains?
 
Grant said:
How would the clown know that they would get upset with jokes about the President? It happens all the time at rodeos all around the country.Maybe they should have made it clear that there were no Obama jokes allowed.
Click to expand...
He should have done the job he was paid to do, as he was insructed to do it. That's usually how hundreds of millions of Americans keep their jobs.
 
ItAin'tFree said:
LOL. I'm glad to be back to get some laughs at your expense.

Please explain how you type out "It is irrelevant what a bull thinks" and not believe a bull actually thinks? This ought to be good.
Click to expand...

Your grasps of English is disturbing. I said it doesn't matter what the bull thinks. How does that mean I think what the bull don't think? And Bulls do think. Do you think a bull has the cognitive functions of an amoeba? Where the hell are you even going with this?

And for the record, no need to tell lies about me, I wouldn't say what a bull thinks is relevant or irrelevant. Are you smart enough to know why? At this point, I'm betting no.
Click to expand...

*sigh*

Enjoy your second infraction.

Where's the news articles? LOL. They didn't make it.
Click to expand...

You do realize you asked for news articles that didn't make the news?

I showed you plenty of gags that never made the news showing that making fun of the President doesn't warrant attention. Until you start alluding that the President should be injured/killed.
 
ItAin'tFree said:
Everyone at the rodeo (and others just like it) are smart enough to know that the clown and the bull are performing the skit with a dummy. It's apparent, there is a few humans without the mental capacity to recognize the difference between dummies, real life and real people and understand the skit is a joke. It's easy to see which group you fit into.

The clown never suggested Obama the real life president be run over by a bull.
Click to expand...

Is that why it made the news when so many other gags about Obama that doesn't involve an entertainer at a state event suggesting he be injured or killed don't get the same attention?

You won't answer that.

The clown suggested Obama, the dummy, get run over by a bull. Kids of all ages at rodeos understand this when they see this skit. That's why they laugh. Same with Adults, exceptions being the recent brain dead. Ask yourself why you can't separate fact from fiction because I don't know why.
Click to expand...

Enjoy your infractions. Especially after Helix explicitly told the threat to cut it out.
 
obvious Child said:
Glad to see you stand with the group of people who think civil society shouldn't be civil.

Again, no one ever argued it was actually Obama. Why is that so hard for people to get through their brains?
Click to expand...

Wasn't it you who said "It's amazing how you don't find an entertainer at a state fair riling up the crowd in a suggestion that Obama should be run down isn't offensive to the office itself".

You see the clown "wasn't riling up the crowd" to suggest that the real Obama should be run down. He was referring to a dummy, not the real Obama, although I can see where this could lead to confusion. The crowd wasn't 'riled up' either. They were, for the most part, laughing.

This bit of clown humor seems to have whizzed right over your head.
 
Surtr said:
He should have done the job he was paid to do, as he was insructed to do it. That's usually how hundreds of millions of Americans keep their jobs.
Click to expand...

What were his instructions? Do you have them handy?
 
Grant said:
Wasn't it you who said "It's amazing how you don't find an entertainer at a state fair riling up the crowd in a suggestion that Obama should be run down isn't offensive to the office itself".

You see the clown "wasn't riling up the crowd" to suggest that the real Obama should be run down. He was referring to a dummy, not the real Obama, although I can see where this could lead to confusion. The crowd wasn't 'riled up' either. They were, for the most part, laughing.

This bit of clown humor seems to have whizzed right over your head.
Click to expand...

We're going to have to disagree on this one. You really believe he wasn't at all alluding to the character represented by the clown? That the clown didn't meaning Obama in any way, shape, or form period? If that's true, why did he wear the mask at all, if he didn't mean Obama at all?

Let's see you stretch to the point of absurdity.
 
obvious Child said:
I said it doesn't matter what the bull thinks.
Click to expand...

That's a great point, but on the other hand if the bull wants to do you personal injury then it would start to matter.
I showed you plenty of gags that never made the news showing that making fun of the President doesn't warrant attention. Until you start alluding that the President should be injured/killed.
Click to expand...

I was unsuccessful in trying to explain that the clown wasn't wanting the real president of the United States to be injured/killed.

Perhaps someone else can manage the job.
 
obvious Child said:
We're going to have to disagree on this one. You really believe he wasn't at all alluding to the character represented by the clown? That the clown didn't meaning Obama in any way, shape, or form period? If that's true, why did he wear the mask at all, if he didn't mean Obama at all?

Let's see you stretch to the point of absurdity.
Click to expand...

Oh I see. You think that because the clown was wearing a mask rather than showing his face in public that he was up to no good.

That's an interesting point that I never really considered.
 
Grant said:
Oh I see. You think that because the clown was wearing a mask rather than showing his face in public that he was up to no good.

That's an interesting point that I never really considered.
Click to expand...

Why am I not surprised you refuse to answer any questions.

Seems you understand the absurdity that your argument has to go to to claim that it's not about Obama and hence why you won't answer.

If you believed it wasn't at all about Obama, why can't you answer? Why did he wear a mask at all?

And your reply is completely unrelated to what I said. You fabricated an obvious lie to avoid answering my questions.
 
Grant said:
I was unsuccessful in trying to explain that the clown wasn't wanting the real president of the United States to be injured/killed
Click to expand...

Are you capable of posting an argument that isn't an outright fabrication? I've already repetitively said that the clown was not Obama. Does the word "allude" mean anything to you?
 
obvious Child said:
Why am I not surprised you refuse to answer any questions. Seems you understand the absurdity that your argument has to go to to claim that it's not about Obama and hence why you won't answer.
Click to expand...

I think we can safely agree that there was an Obama mask involved.
If you believed it wasn't at all about Obama, why can't you answer? Why did he wear a mask at all?
Click to expand...

Maybe he was trying to be funny???

And your reply is completely unrelated to what I said. You fabricated an obvious lie to avoid answering my questions.
Click to expand...

And what lie was that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom