• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reid says Obamacare just a step toward eventual single-payer system[W:1539]

Nothing wrong with those sites. What's wrong is how badly you misread them. But we've covered that many, many times before. :coffeepap

Well, unlike you, I am willing to learn, tell me how I am misreading those sites? You think you have covered that many times but like with most of your posts you aren't sure what you posted and appear to be delusional.
 
He got 2 million fewer votes in 2012 than 2008 and the turnout was worse. still waiting for the site that you believe because apparently BLS.gov, BEA.gov, and the U.S. Treasury haven't made your list as quality sites for accurate data even though we pay debt service on treasury data
if he was as bad as you claim, he would have been voted out, regardless of turnout...your boy lost, move on.
 
Well, unlike you, I am willing to learn, tell me how I am misreading those sites? You think you have covered that many times but like with most of your posts you aren't sure what you posted and appear to be delusional.

:lamo:lamo:lamo now that's funny.

And I have told you. Many, many times. because a number is there during a president's term it doesn't mean the president is responsible for the number. Quite frankly, it's unlikely any president could be.
 
:lamo:lamo:lamo now that's funny.

And I have told you. Many, many times. because a number is there during a president's term it doesn't mean the president is responsible for the number. Quite frankly, it's unlikely any president could be.

Cannot wait until you start your own business and then claim you aren't responsible for the results. Let me know when the economic results of 2013 become Obama's?
 
preach it brother!

Funny, maybe you can get your union steward to read them properly for me. I anxiously await an explanation as to how I am reading those results wrong and when the 2013 economy becomes Obama's responsibility for you see we have almost 22 million unemployed/under employed/discouraged workers, 4 years of trillion dollar deficits coming from Obama spending and economic policies, 50 million Americans on food stamps in 2013, stagnant economic growth in 2013. I guess I am reading those numbers wrong so help explain where I have gone wrong?
 
Funny, maybe you can get your union steward to read them properly for me. I anxiously await an explanation as to how I am reading those results wrong and when the 2013 economy becomes Obama's responsibility for you see we have almost 22 million unemployed/under employed/discouraged workers, 4 years of trillion dollar deficits coming from Obama spending and economic policies, 50 million Americans on food stamps in 2013, stagnant economic growth in 2013. I guess I am reading those numbers wrong so help explain where I have gone wrong?
well, as i am my union steward, i'd be happy to, but as boo has stated, it has been explained to you a multitude of times, and apparently you can't comprehend, and i'm not going to continue to beat a dead horse....with you it is republican good, democrat bad, romeny good, obama bad.
 
well, as i am my union steward, i'd be happy to, but as boo has stated, it has been explained to you a multitude of times, and apparently you can't comprehend, and i'm not going to continue to beat a dead horse....with you it is republican good, democrat bad, romeny good, obama bad.

Good, maybe he isn't part of this group then.

Labor Unions: Obamacare Will 'Shatter' Our Health Benefits, Cause 'Nightmare Scenarios' - Forbes

What I continue to show is that you don't have a clue as to what you are talking about and are used to having others tell you what to do so you cannot think for yourself. Fact, you claim my data is skewed yet never offer anything to refute it or any site you believe is more credible than the ones I posted. That shows you to be exactly who you are.

You also seem to have a very short memory or should I say selective memory, I would be willing to bet you that I have voted for more Democrats than you have voted Republicans but because you are partisan and blinded by an ideology you make wild ass claims that data doesn't support.
 
Good, maybe he isn't part of this group then.

Labor Unions: Obamacare Will 'Shatter' Our Health Benefits, Cause 'Nightmare Scenarios' - Forbes

What I continue to show is that you don't have a clue as to what you are talking about and are used to having others tell you what to do so you cannot think for yourself. Fact, you claim my data is skewed yet never offer anything to refute it or any site you believe is more credible than the ones I posted. That shows you to be exactly who you are.

You also seem to have a very short memory or should I say selective memory, I would be willing to bet you that I have voted for more Democrats than you have voted Republicans but because you are partisan and blinded by an ideology you make wild ass claims that data doesn't support.
:shock::lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo pretty much all this post deserves
 
:shock::lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo pretty much all this post deserves

No question about it, laughing is what the country is doing at unions and liberals in general. You obviously cannot refute the content of the article so maybe you ought to have someone else tell you what to think. Still waiting for the sites you find credible since apparently even the quotes in this site aren't credible because it is another site you don't like. I wouldn't be surprised that comic books are the only credible site for you.
 
No question about it, laughing is what the country is doing at unions and liberals in general. You obviously cannot refute the content of the article so maybe you ought to have someone else tell you what to think. Still waiting for the sites you find credible since apparently even the quotes in this site aren't credible because it is another site you don't like. I wouldn't be surprised that comic books are the only credible site for you.
when all you have is insults con, you have not only lost the battle, as you have, you have lost the war, as you have done....
 
when all you have is insults con, you have not only lost the battle, as you have, you have lost the war, as you have done....

absolutely, I have lost the battle with someone who is incapable of coming up with a site that is credible yet attacks all verifiable data. No question about it any independent reader of our posts would see that I have lost the battle with you. You are a legend in your own mind totally void of facts, logic, or common sense. Guess that is what happens when you have union management thinking for you?
 
absolutely, I have lost the battle with someone who is incapable of coming up with a site that is credible yet attacks all verifiable data. No question about it any independent reader of our posts would see that I have lost the battle with you. You are a legend in your own mind totally void of facts, logic, or common sense. Guess that is what happens when you have union management thinking for you?
again with the insults, is this all you have...sad, really, really, really sad
 
Moderator's Warning:
Avoid personal attacks.
 
again with the insults, is this all you have...sad, really, really, really sad

You are so right, this is extremely sad, I gave you verifiable data that you have said is wrong, I gave you the sites, which you say aren't credible, and I asked you to educate me and give me sites that are acceptable to you and you have failed to do so but continue telling me that I am wrong. I am willing to admit that I am wrong when proven wrong. Give it your best shot, show me where I am wrong, and give me the sites that are acceptable to you?
 
again with the insults, is this all you have...sad, really, really, really sad

I am waiting, randel, for the sites you find credible and for proving that the data I have posted is poorly interpreted. In addition I posted an article showing that unions are dropping off the Obamacare bandwagon and wondered how the UAW felt about going with Obamacare vs the program you currently have?
 
You make the same blanket statements with not reasoning to back it up. I thought it was ok.

edit: :peace :peace :peace

You mean that you don't like the fact evidence posted, so you say silly **** like above to cover you weak support.
 
As a poster, you call General Colin Powell black first and foremost and an American second, as well as a status quo republican loser (SQRL)--You then quite agree, your words, that Powell's performance is complete, racist unAmerican lunacy. Your comments stand on their own.
Was there something you found to be wrong?
 
Romney destroyed himself. Quit blaming others.
If that were true why did the Obama regime feel the need to suppress conservative groups beginning in 2010?

Isn't that why the IRS is in business, to harass and hound conservative groups who might make a difference?
 
Back
Top Bottom