• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News Poll: Phony scandals? Not to voters

then you need to explain the astounding difference in the amount of questions and approval rate between the conservative groups and the progressive group as you try to falsely claim they was treated equally

Look this agreement has been hashed out over and over on these forums, and time and time again you liberals get proven wrong.
accept that fact and stop wasting every ones time trying the same old debunked argument.
Pull the "blame Bush" card or the "Race" card, because the "Liberal group was targeted also" card has been debunked. it has been clearly shown so few was scrutinized, and received 10 times less scrutiny then any conservative group it isn't even relevant
I don't need to explain anything. The Right is trying desperately to show this was caused by President Obama and they haven't lain a finger on him. As a mater of fact in the beginning it was thought that only conservatives were targeted and now we know progressive were as well.
 
It was only 1 Fox news contributor not Fox news

i want to point out it was a year after the water gate investigation started before Nixon was forced out of office so go ahead and bury you head in the sand and keep making lame unfounded excuses. It will be a sad day in history when our first president of color will leave office in disgrace and set back the minority community when it happens

Jesus trfjr, are you STILL trying to push this line? How many times have you used it? :lamo
 
Jesus trfjr, are you STILL trying to push this line? How many times have you used it? :lamo

check back with me in a year or less
 
I don't need to explain anything. The Right is trying desperately to show this was caused by President Obama and they haven't lain a finger on him. As a mater of fact in the beginning it was thought that only conservatives were targeted and now we know progressive were as well.

right you don't need to explain anything because you cant

Facts i don't need no stinking facts im a liberal for gods sake. i make up my own with no proof all i have to do is just repeat it over and over and it becomes truth
 
right you don't need to explain anything because you cant
Exactly! In fact that is what I was going to say. I don't know because I don't work for the IRS.
 
LOL....a FoxNews poll regarding FoxNews "scandals".....this one takes the cake!

It's like Issa issuing a report saying his investigation produced accurate reports.
 
What? That Democrats lie and cheat to win elections?

Wake up and smell the dishonesty that is the Democrat party.

Hey kids, the rightwing reverso-meme in full flower. Take what conservatives do, and assert that Democrats do it.

It's almost beautiful.
 
We do exactly that all the time. Don't you remember Valerie Jarrett's statement that you're either with us or agin us? C'mon. You know it's true. Unless you're advocating for a third party, you're inevitably placing people with a choice between two, and not three or more. At the end of the day, either you believe there's something more than has been shown, or you don't. The Obama administration is telling people that there's nothing more to be seen, and is daily making certain that's true. It's all a little too obvious to even the low information voter. I'd hate to be among those in the administration charged with keeping all the parts of these things inside a box.

No at the end of the day people have a choice between more than two options, especially as far as their opinions are concerned. Party has nothing to do with it.
 
No at the end of the day people have a choice between more than two options, especially as far as their opinions are concerned. Party has nothing to do with it.
Opinions and actions are separate things, as much as we'd all like to believe we act in concert with our opinions at all times. The preferred outcome in complete agreement with opinion is not an option always available. Would be really nice if it was.
 
Opinions and actions are separate things, as much as we'd all like to believe we act in concert with our opinions at all times. The preferred outcome in complete agreement with opinion is not an option always available. Would be really nice if it was.

What? We're talking about a poll that's meant to measure opinion, of course people may not always find their prefered answer among the possible choices but that still doesn't in any way excuse the clearly poor choices offered to the takers of this poll.

In other words, this poll is terrible for judging people's opinions.
 
What? We're talking about a poll that's meant to measure opinion, of course people may not always find their prefered answer among the possible choices but that still doesn't in any way excuse the clearly poor choices offered to the takers of this poll.

In other words, this poll is terrible for judging people's opinions.
I haven't read the entire poll - just a few questions. I think I will now.
 
What? We're talking about a poll that's meant to measure opinion, of course people may not always find their prefered answer among the possible choices but that still doesn't in any way excuse the clearly poor choices offered to the takers of this poll.

In other words, this poll is terrible for judging people's opinions.
I see the same problems in this poll I see in most. Yes, the questions are leading. Yes, the order of the questions, even though randomized at times, suggests problems, especially at the end. Yes, there could be more choices. This all may raise partisan hackles. The poll is never the less a valid sample, and the answers are reflective of general opinion. If you want a specific opinion, you're going to have to make it an essay poll so that all opinions and concerns are addressed. That will never happen.
 
Yeah, but the Blaze posted official transcripts of the hearing....... There is no way progressives could possibly argue against official transcripts...

Maybe not so much argue, since facts are facts, but rather "what he meant was...."

They think we are too stupid to understand things we hear, you know! :shock:

Good morning, Mr. Nick. :2wave:
 
‘Outrageous’: IRS Agent Stuns Members of Congress With Claim About Targeting Scandal | TheBlaze.com

Soon enough these biased tyrants will be throwing one another under the bus until someone is held responsible for these "phony scandals."

There is waaaay too much evidence and the progressive media is doing their best along with the White House to sweep it under the rug by preventing readers from having access to this evidence while laughing these scandals off..... Of course the zombies buy it hook-line-n-sinker.

They wont let facts get in their way - no no.....

The same was said of Fast & fuzzy, Solyndra, "dreamy" immigration policy and the Keystone pipeline decision. It is a case of mind over matter, if the press does not mind then it does not matter. Our congress critters do not have the time, inclination or resources to actually force the executive to enforce the "letter of the law"; all they can do is express discontent and hope to use that to better their own chances for re-election (or to hinder re-election chances of the opposing party's congress critters).
 
Back
Top Bottom