• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions[W:240]

Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

This bill has nothing to do with sound medical science. It's just the pro-life being pro-life, as usual.

In the senate hearings, they didn't really allow any dissenting views to be heard. It was a joke.

Junk legislature from Texas... nothing new here.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

This bill has nothing to do with sound medical science. It's just the pro-life being pro-life, as usual.

In the senate hearings, they didn't really allow any dissenting views to be heard. It was a joke.

Junk legislature from Texas... nothing new here.

At least prolifers on this thread admit that is the goal of the Texas law for which they then revert to their abortion-is-murder religious chanting.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

Yeah put them back in the back rooms with untrained hacks. That will solve the problem for you. You can pretend that abortions aren't happening.

If they are going to insist on having abortions, I would rather they be done with untrained hacks using coat hangers. Maybe if they result in enough deaths or sterilizations many women will choose not to have them at all. Maybe even more women who don't want babies will not get pregnant.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

If they are going to insist on having abortions, I would rather they be done with untrained hacks using coat hangers. Maybe if they result in enough deaths or sterilizations many women will choose not to have them at all. Maybe even more women who don't want babies will not get pregnant.

Nothing like killing born women to satisfy the pro-lifes insatiable need to save the unborn.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

If they are going to insist on having abortions, I would rather they be done with untrained hacks using coat hangers. Maybe if they result in enough deaths or sterilizations many women will choose not to have them at all. Maybe even more women who don't want babies will not get pregnant.

Yes, you fit right in with the ProLife men of this forum.

And as your taxes keep going up, and the country keeps voting to go more socialistic, and when your home is burglarized, your wife/mother/daughter raped, and inflation soars - you can finally claim you got what you wanted too.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

Nothing like killing born women to satisfy the pro-lifes insatiable need to save the unborn.

Even more they want to kill young girls, the younger the better. I bet in Texas they'll get lucky and kill some girls not even teens yet - for the sin of being raped.

(Yes, I know it really annoys some ProLife men on the forum to even hint that rape is a bad thing).
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

Even more they want to kill young girls, the younger the better. I bet in Texas they'll get lucky and kill some girls not even teens yet - for the sin of being raped.

(Yes, I know it really annoys some ProLife men on the forum to even hint that rape is a bad thing).

Texas does have a way of setting moral standards for the nation... You know, Texas, the home of the brave, the land of the free and liberty and justice for all who isn't born.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

The legislation is designed to shut down any and all locations in Texas that do abortions. It also outlaws doctors from doing so. That is as restrictive as it gets.

It seems you do not know the article to which I refer, or you are ignoring my argument and just spamming a talking point.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

So, the REAL question? Did your bad experience convince you that abortions - chemical in the first month or two or surgical if after - be 100% banned in the State of Texas - because that is what the law does.

Oh, and congrats for your economic situation improving and your being able to afford to live in Plano and likely having the economic ability to fly and pay for a hotel, rental car, childcare for other children, et for any daughter you have to another state if she found herself in the situation you did in the past.

(For others info, Plano is an upper middle income white-flight suburb north of Dallas County in Collin County that 50 years ago was farmland and now is, what, 85-90% white and 80% Republican?)

I don't even know how to respond to this tripe, other than to say the condescension and insult are duly noted and summarily rejected.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

Even more they want to kill young girls, the younger the better. I bet in Texas they'll get lucky and kill some girls not even teens yet - for the sin of being raped.

(Yes, I know it really annoys some ProLife men on the forum to even hint that rape is a bad thing).

Do I have your permission to make this post my sig? I'll take silence as assent.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

I don't even know how to respond to this tripe, other than to say the condescension and insult are duly noted and summarily rejected.

You haven't had the "pleasure" yet of getting a glimpse of Joko's dizzying, fevered, tail spinning intellect, I take it?
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

If they are going to insist on having abortions, I would rather they be done with untrained hacks using coat hangers. Maybe if they result in enough deaths or sterilizations many women will choose not to have them at all. Maybe even more women who don't want babies will not get pregnant.

I am appalled.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

The legislation is designed to shut down any and all locations in Texas that do abortions. It also outlaws doctors from doing so. That is as restrictive as it gets.

I can see that you don't want to let facts get in your way, but many links that have been posted for days about Texas Senate Bill 5 have included statements that, supposedly, all but 5 of 42 abortion clinics would have to close their doors. This is because, supposedly, the clinic owners can't afford to upgrade to meet new state requirements.

So instead of collecting feces, those who are ardently pro-choice had better begin collecting funds.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

Moderator's Warning:
There is some baiting going on. It needs to stop. Dial it back please.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

That is really what is it all about. Forcing women to resort to dangerous illegal abortions like in other countries where it is illegal. The pro-illegal abortionists strike again.



Abortion Rates Are Higher In Countries Where Procedure Is Illegal, Study Finds

No offense bud but this was a completely wasted post. Anti-abortionists simply do not care enough about woman to put her life and well being before that of a clump of cells and later a fetus.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

:doh

That argument is.... fail. The fact that people break the law is not an argument against laws, any more than the fact that people commit rape means that we should legalize rape in order to reduce the violence associated with it.

My point was that making laws against abortion won't end the practice. That's why I quoted the post I was commenting on.
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

It's also possible that both women and men will be more responsible about birth control and about their partners. Here's an interesting article: Abortion Promises Unfulfilled | Public Discourse
 
Re: Texas Senate passes sweeping new abortion restrictions

It's also possible that both women and men will be more responsible about birth control and about their partners. Here's an interesting article: Abortion Promises Unfulfilled | Public Discourse

It seems that society might have suffered when personal responsibility took a back seat to the pleasure of the immediate.

Can anyone really defend the idea that it takes longer than five months for a woman to decide whether she wants an abortion or not? Is it the bimbo factor at play here?
 
I think birth control changed the sexual morals more than legal abortion.

The reason there still a lot of unwanted children is because only about one half of unwanted pregnancies ( actually a bit less than that since some churches and some pro lifers guilt a lot of women into continuing an unwanted pregnany ) result in an abortion.

In the blue states where more women wait until they are in their late to get married , there are less divorces, more stable families and less single mothers.


If people want stable families back they have to also understand sometimes that means a girl/ woman delays becoming a wife and a mother until she has an education and/ or a career.
 
I think birth control changed the sexual morals more than legal abortion.

The reason there still a lot of unwanted children is because only about one half of unwanted pregnancies ( actually a bit less than that since some churches and some pro lifers guilt a lot of women into continuing an unwanted pregnany ) result in an abortion.

In the blue states where more women wait until they are in their late to get married , there are less divorces, more stable families and less single mothers.


That's an interesting statistic, given New York, California, et. al. Would you mind posting a link to it?
 
That's an interesting statistic, given New York, California, et. al. Would you mind posting a link to it?

From This:
There's a family-values divide between red states and blue states, two researchers say, but the differences might surprise people on both sides of the political spectrum.
The states that voted Democratic in the last two presidential elections have the lowest rates of divorce and teen pregnancies.
And the red states had the highest.

One of those researchers, June Carbone of the University of Missouri-Kansas City, tells host Guy Raz what she thinks is the deciding factor:
Women in blue states wait later to get married and have kids.


TRANSCRIPT:


GUY RAZ, host:

We're back with ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. I'm Guy Raz.

Back during the 2008 presidential campaign, Sarah Palin visited a small town in North Carolina, a place she called the real America.

(Soundbite of applause)

Ms. SARAH PALIN (Former Republican Governor, Alaska): We believe that the best of America is in the small towns that we get to visit and in these wonderful little pockets of what I call real America, being here with all of you hardworking, very patriotic, very pro-America.

RAZ: The real America was a kind of code phrase for parts of the country where people preach family values and respect the institution of marriage.
{b}But somehow, it's unlikely Sarah Palin was referring to Massachusetts or New Jersey.
And yet according to a new book, the states with the lowest rates of divorce and teen pregnancies are so-called blue states like Massachusetts, states that voted Democratic in 2004 and 2008.

The book is "Red Families v. Blue Families" and its co-author, June Carbone, a professor of law at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, is with me.

Welcome.

Professor JUNE CARBONE (Co-Author, "Red Families v. Blue Families): Delighted to be here.

RAZ: In the book, you talk about the blue family system and the red family systems. Define the terms here. What's the blue family system, and what's the red family system?

Prof. CARBONE: The single biggest difference between the two is the notion of age of marriage or childbearing.

We see this blue system as one that says grow up first, be established, be financially sound, then have a family.
The red family system says it's very important to avoid too much premarital sexuality.
So you're going to move lockstep from school into employment and marriage fairly soon.
You're not going to wait until you're fully established. You're going to get married and have children younger.

RAZ: And now, you found that the lowest divorce rates in the country tend to be in blue states. The highest divorce rates tend to be in states that voted - so-called red states that voted Republican in 2004, 2008.
I think a lot of people would be surprised by that. It seems to suggest that places that are more politically left of center tend to reflect what we might regard as having more traditional family values.

Prof. CARBONE: We were astonished to find how closely the vote, especially in 2004, to a strong degree in 2008, maps on to family structure. Here's the thing that's happened in the blue world. What you have is, again, a system, far more independence. And we find that people who do marry later late 20s, early 30s you've got a pretty good sense who's going to be successful and stable and a good marriage partner at 30. You're still guessing at 22...


read more:
Red Families Vs. Blue Families : NPR
 
Link to divorce rate or teen moms US map :
just click on teen moms or divorce rate for map.

Red Blue States Comparison Map - election, education, divorce, racism, money, sports, obesity and more

You seem to be conflating teen mothers with single mothers. But this information is interesting.

Problem for your argument, though: lots of these deep single-parenthood and high teen-pregnancy states seem to be ones with large african american populations, that demographic being the one most likely to demonstrate the characteristics under discussion and also the most solid "blue" constituency out there. I would bet once you start breaking down past "state" and past "by how the state overall voted in a presidential election", the correlation highlighted here disappears pretty quickly.
 
Back
Top Bottom