• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Walmart says it will kill plans to build 3 new stores if DC wage bill passes

On his own property, he should be able to refuse servicr to anyone, thr same way a business owner can declare his business a gun free zone.

It is almost impossible to believe that any black man would willingly accept discrimination. It's sad when you think of the number of black people who were beaten, fire-hosed, and in some cases lynched to achieve an end to this sort of crap. Clearly you wouldn't have been one of them.
 
So, supplying quality goods at a low price in an under served market is bad for the community, huh?

Yeah, that's the argument they made about selling cotton 150 years ago. Cheap labor costs.
 
That was it? That explains one group of people voting as a bloc for the people who pander to them and give them things? Do you ever think about what happens when they realize that most of the left acts out their racism through low expectations?

When is that day arriving? Recent trends indicate that its going in the opposite direction. But, as with the others, your reasoning is that black people are just too stupid to realize how great the Conservative are and how much they would benefit from right wing politics.
 
thank you ... I wish Rand luck ...

You do understand that the person you are debating is using the name of a Waffen SS soldier, and until recently, had a Waffen SS image as his avatar. He still might. When you debate people who's ideal was a member of a criminal organization guilty of massive war crimes, the position they take on debates like this becomes much easier to understand.

Just one of thousands of links:

http://www.thegermanwarmachine.com/waffenss/atrocities.aspx
 
Last edited:
LOL ... at least you haven't lost your sense of humor, but then again, the GOP is like a circus and maybe you're hoping to be one of its clowns ... Am I right?

Now I'm a clown? Are you intentionally baiting me?
 
Yeah, that's the argument they made about selling cotton 150 years ago. Cheap labor costs.

No it isn't. They're already paying well above minimum wage. Try your hyperbole elsewhere.
 
85-90% misled is "some?" Are you nuts? "Some" typically means a little, a few ... 85-95%, which is what Clinton, Gore, Kerry, and Obama got is the vast majority, not "some" ... Now tell me, are blacks misled more easily than whites? (Be careful, it's a trick question.)

Wasn't it you that said poor blacks don't vote? So, it's not really 85-90% is it? But of course it's possible, look at you. You seem entirely unaware of the entrenched racism in the Democratic party.
 
I explain it as Affirmative Action, which by lifting up millions of Blacks, had an unintended side-effect: middle and upper middle class Black, especially children of Affirmative Action parents, start thinking they're better and did it all on their own, which created a rift in the Black Community, between so called Huxtable Blacks and Ghetto Blacks. And while many Huxtable Black do remain staunchly Democrat, many have not only adopted formerly white middle class neighborhoods, but also the ignorance and bigotry that goes with feeling apart from others.

But of course they didn't do it on their own...they needed your help, right?
 
Trained personnel need not be ejected for stupid reasons, driving up the costs by requiring some new person be trained, instead of adding a new trained person.

But then, I was not addressing jobs exclusively. You asked what was blocked, contending further that Obama has gotten everything he's asked for. Thus is was kid's play to hand you your ass.

Oh, you weren't talking about jobs, exclusively, when teferring to the economy. I thought you people had outgrown all this spin.
 
Wasn't it you that said poor blacks don't vote? So, it's not really 85-90% is it? But of course it's possible, look at you. You seem entirely unaware of the entrenched racism in the Democratic party.

Actually I pointed to the fact that voter turnout is lower among the poor. So there no benefit in keeping voting age people poor, and especially not Blacks, who vote for Dem with remarkable consistency, and are more likely to go to the polls if they're better-off economically.

So that could explain why Reps oppose poverty-reduction. Keep 'em poor and they won't be as likely to vote, since if they did voter in greater numbers, they'd do what the rest of the country has done 3 of the 4 last POTUS elections: vote more for Dems.
 
in the toilet Mac, in the toilet .... Bush had a surplus, squandered it, then took us to the brink of a depression, and then the big-eared guy saved our butts ... be thankful ... Don't be such an ingrate ...

Squandered it? He gave it back to the rightful owners, the US isn't a Bank. And what took us to the brink of depression was the forced lending policies of the Clinton administration. Bush tried to shore up the lending industry and the Dems blocked him. Try again.
 
But of course they didn't do it on their own...they needed your help, right?

Because Libbos think black folks can't do it on their own.
 
Oh, you weren't talking about jobs, exclusively, when teferring to the economy. I thought you people had outgrown all this spin.

No. I was not talking about jobs exclusively when b-slapping a guy who claimed Obama has gotten everything he's asked for from Congress, which is ridiculous.
 
I just did almost an hour with adpst or whatever ... no way I'm doing one with you ... find someone else to annoy ... another time ...

Insults are all you people have. It speaks volumes.
 
Actually I pointed to the fact that voter turnout is lower among the poor. So there no benefit in keeping voting age people poor, and especially not Blacks, who vote for Dem with remarkable consistency, and are more likely to go to the polls if they're better-off economically.

Wrong, without the poor, Dems have fewer to help (exploit) and they loose the propaganda value. Besides, poor voter turnout was quite high in the first Obama election.

So that could explain why Reps oppose poverty-reduction. Keep 'em poor and they won't be as likely to vote, since if they did voter in greater numbers, they'd do what the rest of the country has done 3 of the 4 last POTUS elections: vote more for Dems.

Ridiculous and illogical. As your ilk is prone to point out....the GOP needs that vote right now. Further, welfare has kept them poor...which is not a Republican idea.
 
You do understand that the person you are debating is using the name of a Waffen SS soldier, and until recently, had a Waffen SS image as his avatar. He still might. When you debate people who's ideal was a member of a criminal organization guilty of massive war crimes, the position they take on debates like this becomes much easier to understand.

Just one of thousands of links:

Waffen-SS: Atrocities

I didn't know that, although I had wondered about the avatar ... the Waffen-SS was condemned for its war crimes at the Nuremburg trials ... odd choice, no ... but I'm getting used to this kind of thing from the right in this country ...
 
Wrong, without the poor, Dems have fewer to help (exploit) and they loose the propaganda value. Besides, poor voter turnout was quite high in the first Obama election.



Ridiculous and illogical. As your ilk is prone to point out....the GOP needs that vote right now. Further, welfare has kept them poor...which is not a Republican idea.

Wrong again, Mac. Not you!!!! What's the world coming to??????

Voter_Turnout_by_Income,_2008_US_Presidential_Election.png
 
Wasn't it you that said poor blacks don't vote? So, it's not really 85-90% is it? But of course it's possible, look at you. You seem entirely unaware of the entrenched racism in the Democratic party.

mac, you truly do try a person's patience and I hope you're playing ... Dems in the last four or five elections got between 85-95% of the black vote, i.e., 85-95% of blacks WHO VOTED ... so, no, you didn't discover gold ... it was fool's gold again ...
 
Squandered it? He gave it back to the rightful owners, the US isn't a Bank. And what took us to the brink of depression was the forced lending policies of the Clinton administration. Bush tried to shore up the lending industry and the Dems blocked him. Try again.

when you say the rightful owners, do you mean Halliburton?
 
mac, you truly do try a person's patience and I hope you're playing ... Dems in the last four or five elections got between 85-95% of the black vote, i.e., 85-95% of blacks WHO VOTED ... so, no, you didn't discover gold ... it was fool's gold again ...

Which is not the same as saying that 85-95% of the Black community supports Democrat policies. This really isn't difficult to figure out, even for you.
 
Back
Top Bottom