• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2001-2010 was the warmest decade since records began

Bronson said:
You're just dodging because you can't respond to the substance of the post

Par for the course
Click to expand...

What, your post? The one where you prove you don't read your own sources?
 
Lord of Planar said:
Anyone who believes the IPCC's assessment of how little the sun's changes affect radiative forcing.
Click to expand...

Cite which particular IPCC assessment that has lead to this opinion. I suspect I know where the misunderstanding is but don't want to put words in your mouth.
 
Homer. said:
A new study by the WMO (World Meteorological Organisation) shows the planet "experienced unprecedented high-impact climate extremes" in the ten years from 2001 to 2010, the warmest decade since the start of modern measurements in 1850.

Those ten years also continued an extended period of accelerating global warming, with more national temperature records reported broken than in any previous decade. Sea levels rose about twice as fast as the trend in the last century.

Unprecedented climate extremes marked last decade, says UN | Environment | guardian.co.uk

Further evidence, if any more were needed, that climate change is a reality. Sure, the climate change deniers, like all conspiracy theorists, will deny any evidence put before them. Hopefully this new evidence will make some people to see the reality.
Click to expand...

Belief in natural climate change instead of the man made global warming fairy tale does not make one a climate change denier.
 
Middleground said:
So you are one of those who does not believe we are warming. I bet you can be easily convinced the sky is green.
Click to expand...

how many sources do you want me to provide 4, 5, how about 10 i can if you think I'm making this crap up

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it

article-2217286-157E3ADF000005DC-561_644x358.jpg

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it | Mail Online

New UK Met Office global temperature data confirms that the world has not warmed in the past 15 years.
No Global Warming For 15 Years

Global Warming in Last 15 Years Insignificant, U.K.'s Top Climate Scientist Admits

Read more: Global Warming in Last 15 Years Insignificant, U.K.'s Top Climate Scientist Admits | Fox News

Why Hasn't The Earth Warmed In Nearly 15 Years?
Why Hasn't The Earth Warmed In Nearly 15 Years? - Forbes

Global temperatures have been flat for 16 years
Obama?s global-warming folly - Washington Post

Great news: Global warming ended … sixteen years ago
Great news: Global warming ended … sixteen years ago « Hot Air

U.K. MET OFFICE CONFESSES-- NO GLOBAL WARMING IN 16 YEARS
U.K. MET OFFICE CONFESSES-- NO GLOBAL WARMING IN 16 YEARS

do you want me to keep going or is that enough
 
Redress said:
What, your post? The one where you prove you don't read your own sources?
Click to expand...

Even the NYT says there has been no significant warming in 17 years

Global Warming is a total scam which is why the "scientists" had to manipulate data. This is all a phony narrative by the MSM to push the global warming fear mongering and hysteria again after recent news just came out debunking it. It's all connected to Obama's speech where he recently tried to stir up the pathetic fear mongering again. The public has been fed a healthy diet of "global warming is going to end the world" hysteria for 20 years now. None of the predictions are ever true.

The great green con no. 1: The hard proof that finally shows global warming forecasts that are costing you billions were WRONG all along | Mail Online

article-2294560-18B8846F000005DC-184_634x427.jpg
 
Bronson said:
Even the NYT says there has been no significant warming in 17 years
Click to expand...

The NYT does not say that. Might want to go read your own source.

Global Warming is a total scam which is why the "scientists" had to manipulate data. This is all a phony narrative by the MSM to push the global warming fear mongering and hysteria again after recent news just came out debunking it. It's all connected to Obama's speech where he recently tried to stir up the pathetic fear mongering again. The public has been fed a healthy diet of "global warming is going to end the world" hysteria for 20 years now. None of the predictions are ever true.

The great green con no. 1: The hard proof that finally shows global warming forecasts that are costing you billions were WRONG all along | Mail Online

article-2294560-18B8846F000005DC-184_634x427.jpg
Click to expand...

Your editorial is hardly convincing. I prefer facts.
 
Man-made global warming is a religion, and it's unwise to argue with people over their religion.
 
Awww so cute :2razz: Conservatives that think they understand science.

They've got their little plastic Tonka hard hats on and colored chalk for their blackboard.

Its like a kid with a steering wheel accessory for their car seat, they think they're driving the car.
 
jamesrage said:
Belief in natural climate change instead of the man made global warming fairy tale does not make one a climate change denier.
Click to expand...

Well over 90% of climatologists say ACC is real. Yes, climate change can occur naturally, but the rate of recent climate change is much higher than what has occurred naturally in the past.
 
Verax said:
Awww so cute :2razz: Conservatives that think they understand science.

They've got their little plastic Tonka hard hats on and colored chalk for their blackboard.

Its like a kid with a steering wheel accessory for their car seat, they think they're driving the car.
Click to expand...

Ah yes, the new liberal science. To hell with the Scientific Method, and all that proof crap. Just go with what gets uneducated people scared and to the polls.

Sixteen Concerned Scientists: No Need to Panic About Global Warming - WSJ.com
 
Redress said:
The NYT does not say that. Might want to go read your own source.
Click to expand...

The year since there has been no significant warming is not 1998. It's actually 1995. Phil Jones admitted this.

Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Mail Online

Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 (article was written in 2010) years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.
Click to expand...

Your editorial is hardly convincing. I prefer facts.
Click to expand...

You're just dismissive of facts that reject your global warming religious dogma

Nobody is trying to convince you of anything. You're way to fanatic to bother with attempting that.
 
Erod said:
Ah yes, the new liberal science. To hell with the Scientific Method, and all that proof crap. Just go with what gets uneducated people scared and to the polls.

Sixteen Concerned Scientists: No Need to Panic About Global Warming - WSJ.com
Click to expand...

Ahh and here we go. Little Mister Big Tonka Truck thinks he's on to something big. He points to an article published by the WSL, a group whose purpose is to make money any way they can and run over anyone who gets in their way, no conflict there right? To a person with a functioning brain this would be a red flag but not to Mister Big Tonka Truck. This is the best he can come up with to "prove" his position.

Next up you could take a look at the "scientists" who approve of this article in the OPINION section of a website that you can't trust in the first place. You would see that they are all quacks. One of them is a marketer, one of them doesn't even properly understand the most basic and fundamental experiments in the history of ****ing science, god damned gravity and what would go on to become Newton's second law of motion. He embarrassed himself in front of children and still didn't understand he was wrong, a true conservative role model right there.

I can only imagine the retardation I would find in the other "scientists" but I got bored of researching this garbage.
 
Homer. said:
Well over 90% of climatologists say ACC is real. Yes, climate change can occur naturally, but the rate of recent climate change is much higher than what has occurred naturally in the past.
Click to expand...

that so called survey was done over 10 years ago and some of those same climatologists said Florida would be underwater by now
 
Can someone tell me why I should care about AGW vs Natural Climate Change? If either of them is the correct theory, or neither of them, why does it matter to me?
 
Samhain said:
Can someone tell me why I should care
about AGW vs Natural Climate Change? If either of them is the correct theory, or neither of them, why does it matter to me?
Click to expand...

Well according to the Liberals, if we give the Government more of our money via carbon taxes, all this apocalyptic gibberish will go away.
 
how many years do we need to have with no warming before we agree it is not happening? 10 years 15, 20, 30 ?
 
Fenton said:
Well according to the Liberals, if we give the Government more of our money via carbon taxes, all this apocalyptic gibberish will go away.
Click to expand...

But from that angle, changing how you count it doesn't change anything. The only way for someone who believes that position to reach end state, is population reduction.
 
1970s Global Cooling Scare: ‘Almost every major climate organization endorsed the 1970s ice age scare, including NCAR, CRU, NAS, NASA – as did the CIA’ — Sound Familiar?!

Read the Full Article global+cooling+global+warming+time.jpg
 
Verax said:
Ahh and here we go. Little Mister Big Tonka Truck thinks he's on to something big. He points to an article published by the WSL, a group whose purpose is to make money any way they can and run over anyone who gets in their way, no conflict there right? To a person with a functioning brain this would be a red flag but not to Mister Big Tonka Truck. This is the best he can come up with to "prove" his position.

Next up you could take a look at the "scientists" who approve of this article in the OPINION section of a website that you can't trust in the first place. You would see that they are all quacks. One of them is a marketer, one of them doesn't even properly understand the most basic and fundamental experiments in the history of ****ing science, god damned gravity and what would go on to become Newton's second law of motion. He embarrassed himself in front of children and still didn't understand he was wrong, a true conservative role model right there.

I can only imagine the retardation I would find in the other "scientists" but I got bored of researching this garbage.
Click to expand...

And your devout scientists aren't at all interested in a fist full of Solyndra money to "study" the effects of man-made global warming and line their pockets with the money owed to them by society for their misunderstood brilliance.

Sounds like you were stuffed in a trash can or two by the cool kids back in the day.
 
Erod said:
And your devout scientists aren't at all interested in a fist full of Solyndra money to "study" the effects of man-made global warming and line their pockets with the money owed to them by society for their misunderstood brilliance.

Sounds like you were stuffed in a trash can or two by the cool kids back in the day.
Click to expand...

LoL "Solyndra money", did you get that from Faux news? Quite the bold claim there, all scientists are just funding whores huh? So I guess we can't trust anything? Turn off your computer, it was built from the work of groveling whores we can't trust.

What is this about high school hazing? LoL.... this is the mentality of you people. Your former glory of strutting around high school thinking you're special? They wouldn't dare anyway, some of intelligent types are far more dangerous than your typical stereotyped skinny weakling with broken glasses. :lol:
 
Verax said:
LoL "Solyndra money", did you get that from Faux news? Quite the bold claim there, all scientists are just funding whores huh? So I guess we can't trust anything? Turn off your computer, it was built from the work of groveling whores we can't trust.

What is this about high school hazing? LoL.... this is the mentality of you people. Your former glory of strutting around high school thinking you're special? They wouldn't dare anyway, some of intelligent types are far more dangerous than your typical stereotyped skinny weakling with broken glasses. :lol:
Click to expand...

Given that the mantra to discredit researchers is to "follow the money", presumably back to big oil, you should prepare a better rebuttal in the future.
 
Gawain said:
1970s Global Cooling Scare: ‘Almost every major climate organization endorsed the 1970s ice age scare, including NCAR, CRU, NAS, NASA – as did the CIA’ — Sound Familiar?!

Read the Full Article View attachment 67150068
Click to expand...

You're so full of ****. It had very little traction in the scientific community, those organizations did not endorse it. This is man-made bs from right-wing disinformation campaigns, pathetic.
 
Gawain said:
1970s Global Cooling Scare: ‘Almost every major climate organization endorsed the 1970s ice age scare, including NCAR, CRU, NAS, NASA – as did the CIA’ — Sound Familiar?!
Click to expand...


(Citation needed)

This is total fabrication. I woudnt doubt that every news organization at the time endorsed it.. in the winter when it was cold and snowy. But science, and climatology in general actually was pretty much on the path of showing anthropogenic global warming was real... they just needed a couple decades more to show it. Thats what science does.

Heck - this little clip in 1958 shows that the popular scence media even knew AGW mgiht become a problem.


LOL.
 
Verax said:
You're so full of ****. It had very little traction in the scientific community, those organizations did not endorse it. This is man-made bs from right-wing disinformation campaigns, pathetic.
Click to expand...

See what I mean. You attempt to discredit the source by stating that they are paid for, yet you use the exact opposite logic when defending your source. Hilarious stuff man.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom