Was a conservative group's status taken away?
This is not the point. Harassment doesn't only become harassment if there is a negative conclusion to the practice.
Again, side issue here...The IG's audit found that conservative groups were targeted for undue scrutiny. That is a fact.
Let's take Rove's Crossroads group, clearly a partisan political group ... was its 501(c)(4) status revoked?
Again, not the point. Do you think that harassment of political opponents is justified in an election season, using a agency like the IRS?
... I'll wait until everything is in to make a judgment (I just wish Issa wasn't involved since anything he touches is dirty)
Obviously, from what I quoted from you above, as well as in this very sentence, in brackets, shows this statement to be untrue.
And let's be honest, this too is about Obama, and Issa is trying hard to connect him to it.
Is it wrong in an investigation to try and get to just how high this might have gone? Don't the American people deserve to know that? Or is it just this President you want to put 'off limits' to this oversight?
Wouldn't it be funny if we find that under Bush liberal groups were scrutinized more closely than conservative groups?
No. I would find that disappointing, and further evidence to why I consider Bush to have been a "progressive", only within the Republican party.
... even if the evidence in the end contradicts you and your friend Grand Theft Auto Issa, it won't matter will it?
Weak man.....You're not taking sides, just name calling, and using pejorative defense....mmmmmm k, got it.
Anyway, while there appears to be bias in who was targeted by the IRS...
Ah well, as long as it is against some group you don't like, all's good.
I'm willing to wager that conservative groups are more likely than liberal groups to violate their status.
Now there is some real irony right there....You're judging "bias", while displaying bias yourself in doing so....:lol:
We'll see what happens, and I'd be interested in knowing whether there had been periods when liberal groups were unfairly targeted
"They did it too" justifications are never an excuse. Why are you not willing to look at the here, and now?
-- neither of which would be right, as it would not be right to give this status to groups who do not deserve it.
You don't mean that at all, as evidenced by to body of your post proceeding this sentence...
Have a good day, and I hope you've learned something from my post
I can't speak for Fenton, but I have learned that we have yet another progressive poster, that makes it clear with avitar's, and posts that he is a progressive, spews progressive talking points, but yet hides their lean, and then thinks they are clever. That would not be clever sir, but disingenuous.