yobarnacle
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 1,495
- Reaction score
- 291
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
as an ammo burner yes, so it was you and Kerry, key-rect? I never weighed what I burned up, how do you even do that? I was a ma deuce gunner on a 113 when I first got to Germany, we never weighed our ammo.
Now to address your rather snarky mayhem response... you agree there is rampart mayhem in revolution/war?
The missing science facts-
That were exists a fossil record, dna research, earth strata that are scientific facts supporting a theory, just like gravity?
Now how about the odds of many crossing over to support whoever you think would actually conduct a revolution?
You seem to throw a lot of vague out there, then walk away.
Theories can not be proven, only disproven sometimes. Scientific facts and artifacts do exist. sometimes these "facts" also get disproven. scientists are people. People make mistakes.
How many would cross over? I have a list of names here somewhere....
I counted my ammo boxes, later converted to rough tons, easier to remember as I've forgotten how many boxes. That was 35 years ago.
450 somethin, 460...forget
I chose NOT to count bodies.
never met Kerry
I'm a patriot.
I don't want to see bloody civil war in this country. Ever.
A political revolution restoring traditional constitutional ideals? YES!
Is there a danger the middle class will riot?
Of course.
Is it VERY likely eminent?
I hope not.
Mayhem is a crime, meaning unlawful.
Murder and mayhem do not occur in war.
the killing and maiming is lawfully done.
Not crimes.
Would rebels be guilty of mayhem?
The singular only justification for revolution has ALWAYS been; success.
Other wise, failed revolutionaries are criminals and traitors.
Am I deliberately vague?
Yes.
I'm not fomenting a rebellion.
Am I frothing at the mouth?
Depends on the head on the mug.
Last edited: