- Joined
- Feb 16, 2008
- Messages
- 10,443
- Reaction score
- 4,479
- Location
- Western NY and Geneva, CH
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Do you believe it was done on a technicality? And that a technicality should be allowed on an overarching issue like voting? And that states should now be allowed to hurry in with previously determined illegal voting laws before said technicality can be resolved?
I believe that a court of law should decide things based on a law -- common law, state law, Federal law, Constitutional law, natural law, some clearly stated and widely accepted principle that isn't out of left field. Discarding a law because of an opinion on its relevance in today's world falls under none of those headings.