- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,325
- Reaction score
- 311
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
.... about high tax rates. You people are champion whiners about most everything else.I am guessing is is because they just don't whine as much.
.... about high tax rates. You people are champion whiners about most everything else.I am guessing is is because they just don't whine as much.
That doesn't make any logical sense. Me meaningless posting just go on and on and on without the need for white trash conservatives or black trash liberals being supported by taxes.
.... about high tax rates. You people are champion whiners about most everything else.
It makes about as much sense as your original post. I bet you continue in that tradition.
Which part did you have trouble comprehending?
.... about high tax rates. You people are champion whiners about most everything else.
None. It was gibberish.
Let's try a little discovery exercise. I want you to read the exchange that took place prior to my response. Read over all of it 100 times. After you've completed that exercise, I want you to meditate for 30 minutes over what you learned. When you've finished that, I want you to explain how you came to the above question.Conservatives don't whine about taxes?
I suspect it's part of his genetic makeup.Fascinating. Do you often experience problems with comprehension?
My point is, that liberals whine about practically everything. Actually, it's more like ranting, but that's still a cousin to whining.I don't know, when it comes to whining about the media....
Let's try a little discovery exercise. I want you to read the exchange that took place prior to my response. Read it over all of it 100 times. After you've completed that exercise, I want you to meditate for 30 minutes over what you learned. When you've finished that, I want you to explain how you came to the above question.
Produce Lois Lerner willing to tell the truth. Produce Holly Paz willing to tell the truth. Stop the people from the administration under oath telling lies, and misleading congress. Produce liberal/progressive groups that had to undergo the same type of scrutiny as the TP groups. Explain why TP groups had to wait 30 months or more to hear, and a group like the one started by Obama's nephew was green lighted in just weeks, with his status retro active for 9 months....
I have stated before, this IRS situation is going to be the scandal of all of those out there that is the most dangerous for Obama, but glad to see liberal/progressive supporters day after day defend the corruption that allows this type of outright lying to the American people.
This is my point exactly. If these individuals
testified that there was no political
bias, then they would not be telling the truth and you wouldn't accept it. Now compare this to what it took for you to become convinced that there was a scandal.... a rumor.
There are answers already out there for every single question you've asked. They've been discussed and answered ad nausium.
Emerge AmericaThe IRS said yesterday that the targeting was wide spread ( partially true statement) after Lois Lerner stated initially it was the actions of rogue low level employees in Cinci.
Name a Progressive group targeted and denied its status.
So you understand why your opinion can't be taken seriously.
Its hard to find the truth when IRS officials take the Fifth.
But not impossible.
This is my point exactly. If these individuals testified that there was no political bias, then they would not be telling the truth and you wouldn't accept it. Now compare this to what it took for you to become convinced that there was a scandal.... a rumor.
There are answers already out there for every single question you've asked. They've been discussed and answered ad nausium.
Emerge America
You're welcome.
A "rumor" :lamo No sir....How about Lois Lerner's own words apologizing for doing it in the first place....? Was she lying when she admitted to it in that speech?
Nope, you're right here....Obama is using all three as political tools, or weapons against freedom if you wish....Thanks for pointing that out.
But what's this?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...a-party-targeted-2011-a-6.html#post1061801523
As early as May 13th at 8 AM, you're convinced that this goes all the way to the Whitehouse. The OIG report hadn't even been released at this point.
Name a single group denied its status that didn't deserve to be denied.Name a Progressive group targeted and denied its status.
I just came into this thread to chuckle at how insistent Republicans/conservatives want to be that they were being persecuted. It is so hard to be conservative these days, what with the facts having a liberal bias and all...
This news didn't surprise me in the least. Can we all finally decide to be upset that ANY political groups were abusing of our tax laws? Now that we've established the IRS scrutinized both sides, can we finally say, "Hey, that's what they SHOULD be doing"?
Name a single group denied its status that didn't deserve to be denied.
IRS targeting included liberal groups - CNN.com
The Internal Revenue Service targeted liberal groups as well as conservatives seeking tax-exempt status, a Democratic congressman charged on Monday after the agency acknowledged the inappropriate practice continued until last month.
Rep. Sander Levin said the term "progressives" was included on IRS screening lists of applicants for tax-exempt status made available to Congress on Monday.
It was the first confirmation that the "Be on the Lookout" or BOLO lists used criteria targeting liberal groups after an inspector general's report made public last month said the IRS had used words such as "tea party" to determine possible extra scrutiny.
Can we finally stop pretending that the IRS "scandal" is actually a scandal? The IRS gave extra scrutiny to political groups applying for 501c(4) status. Political groups should be 527's, not 501c's. What we've dealt with so far is a concerted effort by Republicans to selectively release information, giving the appearance of a scandal.
Name a single group denied its status that didn't deserve to be denied.
I just came into this thread to chuckle at how insistent Republicans/conservatives want to be that they were being persecuted. It is so hard to be conservative these days, what with the facts having a liberal bias and all...
This news didn't surprise me in the least. Can we all finally decide to be upset that ANY political groups were abusing of our tax laws? Now that we've established the IRS scrutinized both sides, can we finally say, "Hey, that's what they SHOULD be doing"?
.
:lol:You can if your predisposed to blatant misinformation released to cover selective targeting based on political affiliation.
:lol:Not one of you has named a progressive group that was targeted, harassed and then left in limbo.
Maybe you could name. Progressive group that was denied ?
On two other forums I asked the Libs to give me the name of a Progressive group that was denied.
You cant name one Progressive group that was targeted and denied
Name one Progressive group that was refused it tax status.
Anyway, name a Progressive group that was denied its tax status.
Name a Progressive group targeted and denied its status.
In SIX different posts you challenge someone to name a Progressive group which was denied, and now you act aghast because no one answered a question you didn't ask. Totally shameless, even by your standards.Emerge America
You're welcome.
:lamoHell , your'e so ideologically blind
So...having to wait 2 years for someone to give you ten million dollars is worse than never getting it?what the IRS did was worse. they put those groups in limbo for over 2 years and counting.
I find it amusing you post that like you believe it actually helps your cause. The flip side of that is that applications of progressive groups could be DENIED on the spot by line agents, while those of tea-party groups could not. And, from what I've read (and you're welcome to post a source saying otherwise, I'm not 100% sure about this statement) the only group which actually WAS denied was a progressive group, is that correct?A November 2010 version of the list obtained by National Review Online, however, suggests that while the list did contain the word “progressive,” screeners were in fact instructed to treat “progressive” groups differently from “tea party” groups. Whereas screeners were merely alerted that a designation of 501(c)(3) status “may not be appropriate” for applications containing the word ”progressive” – 501(c)(3) groups are prohibited from conducting any political activities – they were told to send those of tea-party groups off ”to Group 7822″ for further scrutiny.
That means the applications of progressive groups could be approved on the spot by line agents, while those of tea-party groups could not. Furthermore, the November 2010 list noted that tea-party cases were “currently being coordinated with EOT,” which stands for Exempt Organizations Technical, a group of tax lawyers in Washington, D.C. Those of progressive groups were not.
http://nation.foxnews.com/2013/06/25/no-there-are-no-indications-irs-targeted-‘progressives’-way-it-did-‘tea-party’-groups#ixzz2XElIh14g
I am guessing is is because they just don't whine as much.