- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 31,645
- Reaction score
- 7,598
- Location
- Canada, Costa Rica
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
It wasn't just any campaign worker; it was his campaign head, the campaign manager, responding officially to press questions.
Obama was far worse than a terrible candidate, and far worse than a terrible incumbent. His every action, prior to election, oath itself, and actions in office, show an extreme disdain for the Constitution, this country, and our freedoms. Despite this, and the terrible economy and deliberately destructive actions while in office, and serial abuse of power, Romney still lost.
At some point don't you think you should come to terms with the harsh answers to the obvious question as to why?
I think I explained why. I don;t know what I can add to that. Others say it was just getting 'free stuff' and while that certainly was a factor it seems to me that excuse also lends itself to an electorate that responds to the moment, who has little concern or understanding for the future of the country. They were also allowing themselves to be caught up in side issues as to whether the Romney has horses, or a house they don't need, or his religion. I chose to sum it all up with the single word of 'unsophisticated' though i'm also willing to look at others.
Romney had no real hard stance on the fraud that is Global Warming, had a destructive stance government dictated health care, demonstrated penchant for destroying the Constitution, and declared an individual's rights to consist of the 'right' to flee to some other state, like some refugee in the country where our rights are recognized to be unalienable, has mixed reviews on the immigration and the Dream act, no burning desire to restore the constitution, a disdain for the Tea Parties, a despicable entitlement mentality to the office, and a notorious history for being wishy-washy.
Yes, global warning is a fraud but those who are prepared to believe what their leftist leaders say still go for it. It should never have been an issue but of course politicians will create these fears in order to solve them. While a lot of your complaints of Romney's campaign have some merit he was still far and away the better candidate, with a proven record of his outstanding abilities. Just looking at his record in comparison with Barrack Obama's should have locked it up.
How is voting for Romney any sort of "sophisticated" position, when getting to Hell only a tiny bit slower doesn't accomplish anything, and only serves to validate not only the route, but also validate the final destination of Hell itself?
Romney may have had a poor campaign but that is still no excuse to vote for someone like Barrack Obama, a man with no real experience of any sort, expect empty promises of Hope and Change. Romney had a great many ideas if you listen to his speeches, especially in energy, but ideas were seldom a part of the campaign.
It does not matter a wit who's driving, if the destination is unaltered.
Oh Romney would have been quite a different and better President, There should be no doubt of that.