• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lewis Points Finger At ‘Rich White People’ For School Problems [W:178]

I don't think Rahm Emmanuel is black...

I don't know what happens in Illinois, but I know that in many states because of how schools are funded, inner-city students tend to get shafted when it comes to funding. I don't know that it's racism per se, but it's not even "Separate but equal," it's separate and un-equal. You can call it any number of things, but it's an awfully big coincidence that there's a lot of minority students that get shafted in education.

I knew he was part jewish, you mean he's a white guy?? Well then I'm wrong, the white mayor has been holding back the black children in school. And to think he was one of Obama's right-hand men. A personal friend of the Prez, who must feel really let down. But still if it weren't for the other whites not paying enough taxes, like at least 80% or their income...these black children would be way smarter. Everyone knows that money makes people smarter. Right? And don't tell me it isn't racism, cause that's the only thing it could be. The lack of more money is racism. Tell me I'm wrong.
 
As long as the black community continues to blame whites while also continuing to ignore the responsibility for their own choices, nothing will change.

No I got it wrong, they got a white mayor so that makes it whitey's fault. I'll bet the whole school board is white too. Bunch of ****ing racists, probably KKK brought up special from Mississippi.
 
Let's dispel this myth right now. Schools receive a mix of local, state and federal funding. Schools are equally funded from the state and the federal, by law. Where the inequality comes in is in the local funding. Here's a good article about the problem.

I've tossed around the idea of doing away with city governments and opting for the local government to be county/parish. That way you can't just have a mass exodus to juuuuuuust outside the city limit and have the county do fine while the city implodes. County borders are pretty much 100% coverage within a state and their local governments would therefore encompass 100% of that state. Not split portions. Then you'd not have duplicate resources like:

  • separate school systems
  • duplicate government officials
  • separate law enforcement (and jurisdictions)
  • separate fire protection (and jurisdictions)

I'm sure there are loads of other resources that can be added that I'm not mentioning off the top of my head. Cities become county districts... you can still call them cities I suppose but the tax base is the entire county.

Just something I'm pondering.

Whaddaya think?
 
Erm, he's Jewish

E000287.jpg


But nice try at playing the race card while attacking someone for playing the race card

Maybe he is the Bill Clinton of Chicago. Clinton was our first black president. Wasn't he?
 
I've tossed around the idea of doing away with city governments and opting for the local government to be county/parish. That way you can't just have a mass exodus to juuuuuuust outside the city limit and have the county do fine while the city implodes. County borders are pretty much 100% coverage within a state and their local governments would therefore encompass 100% of that state. Not split portions. Then you'd not have duplicate resources like:

  • separate school systems
  • duplicate government officials
  • separate law enforcement (and jurisdictions)
  • separate fire protection (and jurisdictions)

I'm sure there are loads of other resources that can be added that I'm not mentioning off the top of my head. Cities become county districts... you can still call them cities I suppose but the tax base is the entire county.

Just something I'm pondering.

Whaddaya think?


It's not a question of a lack of resources, or funding, or racism. Or "White Flight", so your plan would accomplish nothing really.

It's simply an issue of the culture.
 
It's not a question of a lack of resources, or funding, or racism. Or "White Flight", so your plan would accomplish nothing really.

It's simply an issue of the culture.

You are actually going to break out the "black culture is inferior" argument? Really?

Even though clownboy just showed you the how and why of the discrepancies in funding? I suppose the next step for you is to say everyone that doesn't agree with you are the racists.
 
I've tossed around the idea of doing away with city governments and opting for the local government to be county/parish. That way you can't just have a mass exodus to juuuuuuust outside the city limit and have the county do fine while the city implodes. County borders are pretty much 100% coverage within a state and their local governments would therefore encompass 100% of that state. Not split portions. Then you'd not have duplicate resources like:

  • separate school systems
  • duplicate government officials
  • separate law enforcement (and jurisdictions)
  • separate fire protection (and jurisdictions)

I'm sure there are loads of other resources that can be added that I'm not mentioning off the top of my head. Cities become county districts... you can still call them cities I suppose but the tax base is the entire county.

Just something I'm pondering.

Whaddaya think?

Why shouldn't you be allowed to move out of a jurisdiction if you think opportunities for you and your family are better elsewhere?

I lived in Chicago for years. It's a beautiful city. When I have kids, I'll probably want to move to the suburbs where the schools are better. What's wrong with that?
 
Why shouldn't you be allowed to move out of a jurisdiction if you think opportunities for you and your family are better elsewhere?

I lived in Chicago for years. It's a beautiful city. When I have kids, I'll probably want to move to the suburbs where the schools are better. What's wrong with that?

I don't see what you are saying. You can still move out of that county and into another if you want to change jurisdictions.
 
I don't see what you are saying. You can still move out of that county and into another.

Well, in Chicago, the suburbs are still in Cook County. In Dallas, where I currently live, the suburbs are still in Dallas County.

Maybe it's different in Canada, eh?

I wouldn't want to have to move FURTHER from the city, although I would if it came down to it. Would just burn more hydrocarbons getting to work though.
 
1. Rahm Emanuel is not black. This demonstrates that you have no authority to say if Karen Lewis is right since you don't even have that basic knowledge.

2. The school board - who has made all the harmful decisions in the school system - is, in fact, mostly rich, white people. So, rich white people are, quite literally, responsible for many school problems.

3. Most of disruptive, harmful policies enacted by the school board predominantly affect black neighborhoods. It's not a stretch to attribute that to racism.

So hasn't everything except number one in this post been proven completely wrong. It is NOT mostly rich, white people. It may be rich liberals but not rich white people. If it is not rich white people and it is in fact mostly black people wouldn't the harmful policies enacted in fact not be racism but maybe the liberalism? Why are mostly blacks instituting "harmful policies" for "black neighborhoods"? Is it still racism that they are? Would you agree that using racism here just makes you look like the typical race baiter?
 
Well, in Chicago, the suburbs are still in Cook County. In Dallas, where I currently live, the suburbs are still in Dallas County.

Maybe it's different in Canada, eh?

I wouldn't want to have to move FURTHER from the city, although I would if it came down to it. Would just burn more hydrocarbons getting to work though.

Well it sounds like you want all the benefits of the city without contributing to the city. Wouldn't that be the very definition of mooching?
 
You are actually going to break out the "black culture is inferior" argument? Really?

Black African culture is inferior. Look at the countries in Africa; only a fool would say there backward culture is equivalent to what we have in America.
 
Black African culture is inferior. Look at the countries in Africa; only a fool would say there backward culture is equivalent to what we have in America.

And it's because their skin did that? Also, all african nations are the same and all asian countries are the same and all latin countries are the same and all caucasion nations are the same?

edit... not to mention are you equating all black Americans with all black Africans? Do you even know what point you are trying to make? Cause I don't see what you are saying.
 
Last edited:
Well it sounds like you want all the benefits of the city without contributing to the city. Wouldn't that be the very definition of mooching?

I want the benefit of going to work and the benefit of going shopping, spending money in the city. Of course, if the politicians force me and all the other upper-middle class whites further from the city because they see us as a meal ticket, what's gonna happen to that city when all the "moochers" quit driving in?
 
And it's because their skin did that? Also, all african nations are the same and all asian countries are the same and all latin countries are the same and all caucasion nations are the same?

Alright. I guess we need to do something about all those people fleeing America for Africa.

I don't care what politically correct speak is, the truth is the truth whether or not you or your ilk want to accept it or not. I will not let what is accepted dictate what I say, post or believe.
 
Alright. I guess we need to do something about all those people fleeing America for Africa.

I don't care what politically correct speak is, the truth is the truth whether or not you or your ilk want to accept it or not. I will not let what is accepted dictate what I say, post or believe.

Neither I nor anyone else prior to your post ever said anything about Africa. So... back to America... In your opinion, are black AMERICANS an inferior race?
 
poweRob said:
In your opinion, are black AMERICANS an inferior race?

Come on TexMex... and don't forget your creed:

TexMex said:
I don't care what politically correct speak is, the truth is the truth whether or not you or your ilk want to accept it or not. I will not let what is accepted dictate what I say, post or believe.?
 

So these people.

2. The school board - who has made all the harmful decisions in the school system - is, in fact, mostly rich, white people. So, rich white people are, quite literally, responsible for many school problems.

3. Most of disruptive, harmful policies enacted by the school board predominantly affect black neighborhoods. It's not a stretch to attribute that to racism.

Are mostly rich white people who quite literally are responsible for many schools problems due to racism.

Just making sure I understand your argument.
 
There are other minorities who do quite well. More often the problem lies in culture rather than race.


true, when I was a law/graduate student, one of my sports friends was a post-doctoral student from Ghana. He has earned top honors at some British University and continued that success at the top American university in his field. He said the same thing. He noted that African students tended to make better grades than white kids (true) and far far better than black american students. He noted he wasn't held down by a "culture of failure" but he noted that other than his accent, he looked like a typical black american. So he was just as likely to suffer" racism" in an environment if it was present
 
I want the benefit of going to work and the benefit of going shopping, spending money in the city. Of course, if the politicians force me and all the other upper-middle class whites further from the city because they see us as a meal ticket, what's gonna happen to that city when all the "moochers" quit driving in?

A: Detroit. Part deux.

Its the pot of fool's gold at the end of the liberal rainbow. But you'll never get an asshat liberal to admit it.
 
Neither I nor anyone else prior to your post ever said anything about Africa. So... back to America... In your opinion, are black AMERICANS an inferior race?

Skin color doesn't make one race any better than another. It has to do with taking responsibility for yourself. As long as a person feels that they are inferior and need a hand out to be equal with another person, their downward spiral will continue.
 
Skin color doesn't make one race any better than another. It has to do with taking responsibility for yourself. As long as a person feels that they are inferior and need a hand out to be equal with another person, their downward spiral will continue.

Exactly who is it in America that's on this continual downward spiral?
 
Exactly who is it in America that's on this continual downward spiral?

I'll let you figure that one out. It shouldn't be too difficult, even for you.
 
Back
Top Bottom