• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Putin: Didn’t feel isolated, not all G8 leaders agree Assad used chemical weapons

Re: US's Anti-Syria Propaganda Stumbles

Voltaire.com is a blog at best and quite clearly a propaganda website. The Daily Fail is a tabloid.

Objecting to propaganda and tabloids is not nazism.

It's telling that the obliteration of ones source(s) results in personal attacks including a flat-out Godwin. Such a hysteric reaction is to be expected from a "point" being pushed by garbage citations and such only reinforces the likelihood that there's really no issue upon which to debate but merely a desire to propagate a narrative.

:roll:
Okie dokie...

Turkey arrests Syrian Nusra Front militants -media

Is this acceptable or is this still a no no in your world?
 
Re: US's Anti-Syria Propaganda Stumbles

trust.org?

groan

ironic
AKA the Thomson Reuters Foundation... Ring a bell? Or is that not "trustworthy" :lamo
 
Re: US's Anti-Syria Propaganda Stumbles

AKA the Thomson Reuters Foundation... Ring a bell? Or is that not "trustworthy" :lamo

The website appears normal. Nonetheless, "trust.org" is haha.
 
Re: US's Anti-Syria Propaganda Stumbles

The website appears normal. Nonetheless, "trust.org" is haha.

So a news organization is how it appears haha :lamo
 
Re: US's Anti-Syria Propaganda Stumbles

So a news organization is how it appears haha :lamo

I generally dig a bit deeper and expect considerably more verification. That this supposedly involved Al N, and not the forces supported by the West, only makes the use of ~"truth.org" more ridiculous.
 
Re: US's Anti-Syria Propaganda Stumbles

\That this supposedly involved Al N, and not the forces supported by the West, only makes the use of ~"truth.org" more ridiculous.

Well saying that the source did claim that.. I dont see your point..
 
Re: US's Anti-Syria Propaganda Stumbles

What on earth are you on about? Something about me having 175 posts that makes me familiar with this site? And something about a remark about a member, uh, ....................... I secretly know some member?






I think it was him who said that Pelletiere had forgot about what happened or something like that. That's definitely a waste of everybody's time. But if it works for you then run with it!



More than anything you are demonstrating frustration at the fact that the allegations of chem/bio weapons by Assad have no basis in fact. And it appears that a reference to Del Ponte is doubly unsettling for you and your agenda. But I'm willing to work with you on it if you want to. I could find lots of references to the UN's Del Ponte saying that the use of the gas evidence was leaning toward it being used by the terrorists. Could you keep it together long enough to explor even that a little further?

Dude, you have the opinion of one ex-CIA agent against many credible organizations, including the United Nations, which you had formerly described as being credible. Anyway, let me put his claim to the test.

I should begin by pointing out that he provided little evidence for his claim other than him saying that he was in a position to know those things, and referencing confidential intelligence documents. There's no way to confirm or refute his claims without also being privy to that information. He only discussed the actual attack in a few sentences, the rest was basically calling the US government liars and the American people gullible.

Then, I should raise a Joost Hiltermann, head researcher of Human Rights Watch, who in a fairly anti-US article argues that Iraqi and Kurdish sources indicate Iraqi responsibility.

Here Pelletiere says:

The condition of the dead Kurds' bodies, however, indicated they had been killed with a blood agent - that is, a cyanide-based gas - which Iran was known to use. The Iraqis, who are thought to have used mustard gas in the battle, are not known to have possessed blood agents at the time.

Actually, most of those taken to hospitals in Tehran were exposed to mustard gas. Survivors described the smell as fruity, which is closer to tabun, a nerve agent that Iraq had used in the battle, than to any blood agent.

If I may add, Halabja is not the only incident of Iraqi genocide against the Kurds, nor is the Kurdish genocide the only blemish on Saddam's resume, others being oil-for-food, Marsh Arab genocide, tyranny, and his wars of aggression.
 
Re: US's Anti-Syria Propaganda Stumbles

Maybe Putin was so comfortable because he had that Super Bowl Ring.....
 
Back
Top Bottom