• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

You don't fool me with your pseudo intellectual bs, save it for another. The fact that you sling a bunch of disjointed terms out there to prove your science "creds" then turn around and **** all over scientists is hilarious.

Scientists are the closest thing we have to paragons of accuracy and knowledge... do you disagree? The very definition of a real scientist is somebody who searches for knowledge, for the truth.

But this is inconvenient to your agenda, so you have to ad hominem scientists, especially climate scientists... pathetic. Oooh but you say geologists know, they know the truth, and the truth is that we don't know enough. You go back and forth so many times its ridiculous. Can we trust scientists or not?

This all leads up to your last ad hominem that I'm just a weakling that needs scientists as my god to blindly follow.

This is all rehashed crap you've assembled and slinged at me. I'm done arguing with you silly folks about this. If you want to have a real discussion, I suggest you take an introductory course in integrated science.

Been there, done that and have a BS degree, yours? It's obvious you need to take your own advice seriously. Ditch the cult reverence and learn to understand what we do know of the system right now. Do that and it will be clear to you that the AGW marketing arm is not giving you the straight poop.
 
Oh, so your argument is, the slow down in global warming is a part of global warming?

Can you possibly imagine how your sound?

How does the "slow down" sound in the face of the past decade being the warmest on record?
 
How does the "slow down" sound in the face of the past decade being the warmest on record?

I can answer that.
The gov't wants to say the Global Warming data is inconclusive and it's not our fault.
Corporate says that we have paid scientists to say that Global Warming is not supported by our data, and it's not our fault.
Big Energy pays $10,000 for each paper by a Phd that suggests Global Warming is not real, and it's not our fault.
Chemical corporations can also pay for Engineers who will state Global Warming data is incomplete, and it's not our fault.
Universities supported by grants from Energy, Chemical, Financial or Corporate benefactors will direct research to support the Grantors requests, and it's not our fault.
The 99% of scientists who acknowledge Global Warming as real went to lesser non-corporate grantor Institutions, and it's the fault of the preceding four and subsequent two.
The Gov't influenced Media will act as stenographers for gov't and corporate who pay their bills, and it's not their fault.
The Military will spout whatever line the political power in charge dictates, word for word, and it's not their fault.
Sounds like logic and reason will not be required this season, eh?
 
Last edited:
How does the "slow down" sound in the face of the past decade being the warmest on record?

How far back does the "record" that you speak of go?

Who's numbers are you relying on?

Look Ditto, responsible people don't go around claiming "hottest on record", they show the data....What is the rise in temp? .0002 of 1 degree?

Yeah, talk to the hand.
 
I can answer that.
The gov't wants to say the Global Warming data is inconclusive and it's not our fault.
Corporate says that we have paid scientists to say that Global Warming is not supported by our data, and it's not our fault.
Big Energy pays $10,000 for each paper by a Phd that suggests Global Warming is not real, and it's not our fault.
Chemical corporations can also pay for Engineers who will state Global Warming data is incomplete, and it's not our fault.
Universities supported by grants from Energy, Chemical, Financial or Corporate benefactors will direct research to support the Grantors requests, and it's not our fault.
The 99% of scientists who acknowledge Global Warming as real went to lesser non-corporate grantor Institutions, and it's the fault of the preceding four and subsequent two.
The Gov't influenced Media will act as stenographers for gov't and corporate who pay their bills, and it's not their fault.
The Military will spout whatever line the political power in charge dictates, word for word, and it's not their fault.
Sounds like logic and reason will not be required this season, eh?

You exhale that evil Co2 while doing nothing but spewing propaganda...You should think about that.
 
How far back does the "record" that you speak of go?

Who's numbers are you relying on?

Look Ditto, responsible people don't go around claiming "hottest on record", they show the data....What is the rise in temp? .0002 of 1 degree?

Yeah, talk to the hand.

Let me google that for you
 
You exhale that evil Co2 while doing nothing but spewing propaganda...You should think about that.

I am the one that is thinking!
 
How far back does the "record" that you speak of go?

Who's numbers are you relying on?

Look Ditto, responsible people don't go around claiming "hottest on record", they show the data....What is the rise in temp? .0002 of 1 degree?

Yeah, talk to the hand.

I have been.
Hands don't listen so well.

Warmest decade on record

For the first time, and in a single compelling comparison, the analysis brings together multiple observational records from the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the ocean,” said Jane Lubchenco, Ph.D., under secretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere and NOAA administrator. “The records come from many institutions worldwide. They use data collected from diverse sources, including satellites, weather balloons, weather stations, ships, buoys and field surveys. These independently produced lines of evidence all point to the same conclusion: our planet is warming,”

That's according to NOAA.

Now, counter that with a blog written by someone with an agenda, but no scientific backing.

Global warming did not end 15 years ago, period.
 
I have been.
Hands don't listen so well.

Warmest decade on record



That's according to NOAA.

Now, counter that with a blog written by someone with an agenda, but no scientific backing.

Global warming did not end 15 years ago, period.

Maybe not, but you still didn't answer the question...Figures...Anyway, guess what, man's exhaling didn't cause any Global warming, just as my F-150 didn't either...So, like it or not, your attempt to make a declarative statement, end it with "period", and shut the debate on the matter without answering the question posed to you is proof that this is all a bunch of hooey.
 
Obama's Energy declares a "war on coal".... Wonderful....Hope y'all are warm this winter with no power.
 
Maybe not, but you still didn't answer the question...Figures...Anyway, guess what, man's exhaling didn't cause any Global warming, just as my F-150 didn't either...So, like it or not, your attempt to make a declarative statement, end it with "period", and shut the debate on the matter without answering the question posed to you is proof that this is all a bunch of hooey.

Your question had nothing to do with carbon dioxide exhaled from your lungs or mine, your F150 or my Tundra. It was about the amount of warming and the source of the information.

It was, to wit:

How far back does the "record" that you speak of go?

Who's numbers are you relying on?

Look Ditto, responsible people don't go around claiming "hottest on record", they show the data....What is the rise in temp? .0002 of 1 degree?

Yeah, talk to the hand.

I believe everything was covered in my link, except perhaps for the amount of warming. While the numbers vary depending on geographical location, the average is somewhere around 1 degree C.
 
That's according to NOAA.

Now, counter that with a blog written by someone with an agenda, but no scientific backing.

OK. Here. BTW are you suggesting that NOAA has no agenda?
 
Back
Top Bottom