• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees [W:33]

Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Spending money at home only increases an entitlement attitude among our obese, diabetes having, scooter riding, x-box gaming, fast food eating, first world problem having crybabies. Better to spend the money abroad on people who actually need it, instead of funding another generation of worthless lard body selfish scumbags.

Right, because nobody in the United States is needy......give me a break man.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Right, because nobody in the United States is needy......give me a break man.

Have you ever seen real poverty? Third world abject hopelessness? The kind of poverty that results in 50,000 children dying every day of lacking food and water?

Spare me the romantic lamenting of the scooter-people.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Have you ever seen real poverty? Third world abject hopelessness? The kind of poverty that results in 50,000 children dying every day of lacking food and water?

Spare me the romantic lamenting of the scooter-people.

I spent a good deal of time in the squatter camps of South Africa. I also have seen poverty in the United States though. Just because you turn a blind eye to it does not mean it doesn't exist. You can come off of your horse now.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Elaborate please?

I'm with Bob Beckel on this one. A two year moratorium on Muslim immigration to the USA. he's a liberal in case you're wondering. :)

Tim-
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

I spent a good deal of time in the squatter camps of South Africa. I also have seen poverty in the United States though. Just because you turn a blind eye to it does not mean it doesn't exist. You can come off of your horse now.

Turn a blind eye? I live on 1200/month, in a neighborhood full of SSI, SSD and section 8.

Spare me the sob story from fatass first worlders.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Turn a blind eye? I live on 1200/month, in a neighborhood full of SSI, SSD and section 8.

Spare me the sob story from fatass first worlders.

Do you actually have anything meaningful to contribute other than conceited vulgarities?
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Turn a blind eye? I live on 1200/month, in a neighborhood full of SSI, SSD and section 8.

Spare me the sob story from fatass first worlders.

Consider yourself spared.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Moderator's Warning:
Please keep on topic which is not other posters.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Preznit Obomber, serial fascist Nazi butt pipe, pulls a
Dubya and says “government used [WMD] chemical weapons” in Syria. Thats pure bull. Why I write and why I will never vote Democrat again, and why Obama must be impeached/ removed from office. All those dead Libya /Syrian people will never see another Xmas because of NeoCon Obamas ruthless slaughter done in secret like Reagans Contras … There are reports of mass graves in Westerm Libya hidden from reporters banned from entering that region of the country, 11,000 bombing sorties from NATO, levelled the country. The fascist Obomber starts a new war in Syria, makes up a lie about WMD to keep it going, will send US bombers any day to slaughter innocent people who have done nothing … and the Left Wing talkers are just whining about the Keystone pipeline all day.This country makes me sick. Or you got Bill Maher blaming all the wars on the Muslims, or the Koran. What a bunch of pompous asses. Liberal talk shows try to spin away from Obama war crimes. Turn off those shows.

Go here for truth progressive radio network

http://www.prn.fm

“U.S. secretly backed Syrian opposition groups, cables released by WikiLeaks show”

supplemental reading:

The Arab American News - Syria and U.S. imperialism

The Dirty War on Syria | Progressive Press
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Preznit Obomber, serial fascist Nazi butt pipe
Why did I laugh so hard at this?
 
You know, the US government needs to stop wasting money trying to help other countries that would resolve nothing or take years to resolve. And fix the issues within the US first. I think it's a heck of a lot better use of time and money on our part.

They aren't really trying to help anything... They are trying to secure resources; oil pipelines, drugs, human trafficking routes, all the "black" money.

It makes for a better sell though, Obama's humanitarian bombing campaigns last year or so.

I do agree with you however... Or better yet, teach our kids that the "rock stars" are the engineers, the doctors, the scientists, entrepreneurs...

But, like most addicts it takes hitting rock bottom to rebuild.
 
LA Times - U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees
U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees - latimes.com



I don't even know where to start on the folly of this plan...

So open borders with Mexico isn't good enough now we should start taking "Syrian refugees" next?

Of course, all the while our government is spying on US citizens using "terrorism" as their excuse but they're willing to open the backdoor to Syria?
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Anybody remember when Dick Cheney gave arms to Saddam Hussein in the 1980's?
Of course, but was Saddam at war with the US at the time? Were there any Al Qaeda within his ranks back them? I think not, Al Qaeda are clearly present in large numbers with the Syrian rebels.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

I know a Syrian family and they are great people, but I wouldn't want "refugees" of this war to come here.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Anybody remember when Dick Cheney gave arms to Saddam Hussein in the 1980's?
No, because it never happened.

From 1979 to 1989, he was a congressman. He didn't sell Iraq anything during the Iran-Iraq war. In 1989, he became Secretary of Defense.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Turn a blind eye? I live on 1200/month, in a neighborhood full of SSI, SSD and section 8.

Spare me the sob story from fatass first worlders.

So you are part of the 47% Romney talked about.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Of course, but was Saddam at war with the US at the time? Were there any Al Qaeda within his ranks back them? I think not, Al Qaeda are clearly present in large numbers with the Syrian rebels.

The point is we could be arming people who will turn out to be our enemies.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

So you are part of the 47% Romney talked about.

Yes, I am! They told me about death and taxes, but thus far the latter has been no object. I think that I may escape that "inevitability" entirely. I could get food stamps and an Obama phone, but I haven't because I don't really need it. I think about doing so just to rub it in. I'd tell people that I fill my bathtub with Obama money and roll about in it each month.
 
Last edited:
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Yes, I am! They told me about death and taxes, but thus far the latter has been no object. I think that I may escape that "inevitability" entirely. I could get food stamps and an Obama phone, but I haven't because I don't really need it. I think about doing so just to rub it in. I'd tell people that I fill my bathtub with Obama money and roll about in it each month.

But you do get a check every month from the gov't for living expenses. How old are you?
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

But you do get a check every month from the gov't for living expenses. How old are you?

I don't get any government check. It's my 1200/mo (savings and investment) and I ask nothing of the government. What I should do is get a food stamp card, sell the 'stamps' for 66%, fill the tub with the cash, roll around it for a while and then go spend your money on hookers and booze. I think it'd be great, but it just requires a bit much effort.

I think you are in violation of a specific in-thread warning, so I suggest that you do not pursue this avenue any longer.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

I don't get any government check. It's my 1200/mo (savings and investment) and I ask nothing of the government. What I should do is get a food stamp card, sell the 'stamps' for 66%, fill the tub with the cash, roll around it for a while and then go spend your money on hookers and booze. I think it'd be great, but it just requires a bit much effort.

How is it that you get $1,200 each month. From what source?
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

How is it that you get $1,200 each month. From what source?

Private sources and none of your business.

Note the edit to my post, above.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

Private sources and none of your business.

Note the edit to my post, above.

You are the one who brought it up originally, i.e., your personal finances.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

You are the one who brought it up originally, i.e., your personal finances.

That was prior to the in-thread warning. I answer your badgering, which is in violation of that warning, at my own peril.
 
Re: U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees

That was prior to the in-thread warning. I answer your badgering, which is in violation of that warning, at my own peril.

I did not see the in-thread warning until you pointed it out. You stated earlier that you think the US should be sending their money overseas instead of spending it here. Being part of the 47%, how do you justify sending other peoples' taxpayer money overseas?
 
Back
Top Bottom