Heya Gie. :2wave: Seems the AP CEO called it like it is. As it is along the same lines they did with the AP.....Evidenced.
Pruitt said the seizure has made sources less willing to talk to AP journalists and, in the long term,
could limit Americans' information from all news outlets.
"And if they restrict that apparatus ...
the people of the United States will only know what the government wants them to know and that's not what the framers of the Constitution had in mind when they wrote the First Amendment," he said.
"
They've been secretive, they've been overbroad and abusive — so much so that taken together, they are unconstitutional because they violate our First Amendment rights," he added.....snip~
AP CEO calls records seizure unconstitutional - AP News - Breaking News
Watchdogs from both the left and right have expressed deep reservations and concerns about the threats to civil liberties and freedom of the press that are occuring under the DOJ. But don't worry, Holder assures us that there is no need to investigate any of that and if there is, they will investigate themselves. Ya know, to keep it objective.:2razz:
Somebody is trying REALLY hard to make this personal and it's just not working out his way.
Simple facts:
1. Kim and Rosen exchanged e-mails.
2. Rosen asked Kim to released classified documents.
3. Rosen should have known that doing so would mean Kim breaking the law.
4. Rosen is at the very least guilty of conspiracy to break the law.
That you keep trying over and over to hide behind the word "alleged" doesn't change the facts. Well, it would for a paid shill. Is that what you are Gie? A shill? I'd hate to think somebody would spend a year and a half of their lives getting paid to defend a website. It seems like such a bottom feeder job.
Maybe the 15th time you rinse and repeat your mantra, you'll even convince yourself?
Then every reporter who ever published a leak from CIA, etc., including several at the New York Times and Washington Post, is guilty of espionage. How stupid of you people.
Like I said two pages ago, this just gets more
idiotic and now increasingly desperate as it continues. I do so enjoy it when brave "debaters" won't reply to anything that contradicts them and if they do, it is just to ignore it and then restate their mantra. As they simultaneously demonstrate they don't have an honest understanding of the differences between allegations and facts in their
own linked article. So here we are after DOJ spent a year "investigating" Rosen and all Hatuey can point to is an article that contains the allegations that DOJ was investigating. I'm sure that the moment Rosen is actually found guilty, factually guilty of the
allegations lodged against him by Obama's DOJ Hatuey will of a sudden at last grasp the difference. Of course I'm also pretty confident that (either the conviction or Hatuey's sudden command of the subject) will never happen. And speaking of some actual facts that Hatuey can't steel himself to address, meanwhile if DOJ is looking for actual leaks of classified material, they need look no further than the administration itself which has already admitted and apologized to Israel for leaking. Another of several
facts presented to him early on which he can't address, not because he is "hiding" from it all, it just does not fit his mantra. Besides, they apologized! Maybe Rosen, if actually found guilty of the allegations, can apologize too? I mean it is enough for the IRS and administration, so should be for Rosen too.
And seriously, why is it almost all of the DP members who can't differentiate between facts and allegations and have no eye whatsoever for either facts and allegations about this administration, are all certified and well known prolific Fox News obsessives?