- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 38,198
- Reaction score
- 15,839
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Hey! That's your MOM'S testosterone they're talking about.
I was genetically predisposed to be a big guy, as most men on my fathers side exceed 6'4" and 250 lbs. I had a uncle who WAS 6'8'' ( Father's younger Brother who passed away 3 years ago ) and over 400 pounds easy. When I came out of High School after playing football for 6 years straight I was 6'7", 280 and could bench press 390 pounds. And no, I never took steroids.
He use to irritate the crap out of me when I was a kid ( 9-10 years old ) , wrestling, fighting and such, and I would try with everything I had to just move him 3 inches off of the spot he was occupying or to hit him hard enough to get a reaction out of him other than him laughing at my attempts.. No dice, as it was analogous to attacking a fire engine.
He was a Offensive linemen in College and until his death was built like a brick wall. He was also one of the nicest guys Iv'e ever known and knowing that I would eventually reach a height and weight and strength comparable to his, he taught me never to use my size as asset, because first my size was going to be a given, and second it was a cheap way to go through life intimidating those that I either disliked or were in competition in.
There was never any need to throw my weight around and since I can remember I have gone out of my way to make sure people judge me by my character and intelligence not my size. It was never my fault I was built like this as it runs in my family, ( my oldest is in the navy 6'7'', a slim 240 ).
We are also predisposed to knee and hip problems because of our height, and heart problems, That's what killed my uncle.
I don't see any direct correlation to a political ideology and someone's size.
Fair enough, you cleared up your stance on the issue alittle bit.
I will say this, this article is about upper body strength. Yet you seem to be mixing this up with size, when you say "this article is about the bigger the better." Strength is a feat of performance, same as a marathon is. Size or "bigness" is a object of vanity.
Jeff Monson...finally.
I couldn't think of that guys name and Iv'e seen him fight before.
I hate tattoo's, and have never been inspired for an instant to get inked up. I would rather have a one on one discussion with Monson before I decide whether or not he's a communist.
Cage fighters get repeated concussions.
he's an anarchist, IRC. Has a masters in political science
Most liberal men I have met are weak skinny gutless pacifist girlymen types, just sayin
Chris Hayes.
Well there's that.
You should get out more. Perhaps expand your horizons and such. The world you live in seems to be very shallow, supporting the stereotypes you'd like to see.
Mesomorphs used to rule, until 12000 years ago or so.
I suspect they haven't adapted to the equalization of technology.
And since no one obeys them simply because they are bigger anymore, they resent those rresponsible for leveling the playing field. And yearn for the good old days.
Half tongue in cheek, but that's what I suspect.
You would have a point if our life span was hundreds of years but technology has replaced raw muscle for at least a couple of generations now and everyone alive today knows nothing except technology.My particular industry may be the last hold out in that regard though, there are no pencil neck 90 pound weakling loggers.:lol: But even then we now use chain saws instead of axes and misery whips so we too have progressed.
They should do a gene map on you to pinpoint its exact location.
And its pretty funny how you are claiming IQ is your overall measure of superiority, when its a progressive mantra to protect the less intelligent and the less qualified from competition in schools, the job market, etc. Seems your party is only interested in the illusion of high IQ's and not actual measurable intelligence.
I get out often. I just don't frequent the places where liberals go. Like Starbucks, communes, bath houses, welfare offices, Broadway shows, or occupy wall street rallies. I choose not to be around them. They disgust me.
While this my be true for people who use machines or bodybuilders - powerlifters, Olympic weightlifters and people who train like them have far more strength than anyone else on the planet.
Tell that to a horse or a mule.
pound for pound gymnasts are pretty strong
for small dudes-jockeys are bad asses. that's a rare combination of toughness and iron balls in a small package
Physical strong men are notably less intelligent. So I think we've found the connection.
Truth. I have a friend who was a gymnast. Guy was immensely strong but still when your talking about limit strength or power generation it has to go to Olympic and powerlifters.
For my money though the best conditioned people are boxers.
Perhaps it is because they are more able to take care of themselves without the help of others.
I was kind of running with the "God created man, ut Sam Colt made them equal" bit.
But you know smaller men survived by making themselves useful, and it must have been developing the kind of tech that ended up ending rule by might alone.
Don't forget that their genes are still telling them to be the boss, and lots of bosses are at least fiscally conservative.