Give me the quote where the constitution expressly, or even obliquely, states that the governments power to protect rights does apply to the unborn an every stage.
This Kabuki dance you keep dragging us through has gone from the really ridiculous to super absurd...
Everyone reading these discussions [no longer a debate, you apparently got “nuthin” to argue ] must be as weary as I of these constant banal, redundant and repetitive inanities you keep foisting upon us. And then foisting on us yet again, adding nothing new but a few caustic yet clumsy jibes.
You see, we can all observe as you make foolishly bizarre statements that you simply cannot back up…then, for some reason, re-advertise this inadequacy, reiterating this lack of knowledge…why? I am savvy enough to know not to make such similarly silly statements.
How many times now, 5, maybe six, that I have informed and re-informed you that the Constitution is silent on both “born persons” and “unborn persons”?
Let me ask, just so I can get an idea, just how many times will it take telling you THAT FACT until you actually think about it, reflect and actually realize that… I mean, until you get it?
Then the part of the dance where I tell you that I did not say anything about unborn persons in the Constitution where you say it does, but can never point this out [ or anything else out when you speak of the Constitution ]... then I re-inform you that the Constitution, through the 9th and 10th Amendments allows we the people to what needs be done, whether it be born or unborn, should we decide to do so. Then you will try to bring up, again, that SCOTUS is the Constitution, that the Constitution allows for the Supreme Court judicial review, which it doesn't but at the same time we do know of the tradition established with the case of Marbury v Madison...blah blah blah...
Or… maybe the better question…Will this fairly simple concept, Constitution being silent on the issue, ever sink in? Seems pretty simple to the rest of us…do you really not understand the concept? I mean, seems reasonable to assume that this has gone far beyond the point where one can utilize simple naive ignorance of the Constitution… to where one is actually just being obstinate… but why? Cannot accept reality?
Do you have anything new to add? Have anything that will prove any, ANY, of your assertions? If not, do us all a favor...