• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House in damage control mode as potential scandals pile up [W:378]

News just in... the General was shot by man on the horse. GOP's main concern... what color was the horse.

News Just in and that was known before-hand. The Libyans Warned the State Dept 3 days ahead of the attack. That horse came in Riding Black and White.

Also the Other news Just In.....they knew AQ had morphed into Ansar Al Sharia from Iraq and Yemen.....all the way to the Magreb. That horse pulled a Chariot.
 
Four Americans are killed, because of the president's incompetance and you ask, "who gives a ****?".

For you apparently only deaths that happen while a Dem is president is something to give a **** over.
 
Havent seen many presidentual admins, but I wouldn't call this response unprecedented. They all shift the blame. GWB did when no WMDs were found. How many people did he end up during?


I think it's typical DC.

Except Obama did it intentionally. Bush acted on intelligence that Democrats and allies agreed with.
 
I'm a
Bushbot? You got a link where I defended warrantless wiretapping?

I don't think investigators should have to get a warrant to listen in on a call coming out of Iran. That part's true. I've never defended warrantless wiretapping of domestic phone calls.

What if it's a journalist working in Iran?

Your point is weak anyway. Why Iran only? That's not the.way laws are written or work. Iran only people, not Iraq, not Pakistan were Osama was hiding, Iran only.
 
For you apparently only deaths that happen while a Dem is president is something to give a **** over.

Wow, your president is proving to be Tony Soprano, and you still don't care.

Your party agreed with Bush, then changed their tune like the spineless wimps they are. Benghazi is just typical of their clueless incompetence.
 
Woodward and Bernstein will continue to be trotted around, even perhaps in caskets one day soon, anytime there's a sniff of presidential illegality or intrigue.

What was stranger was the presence of that striga , Olympia Snow. trotted out for what ? As the last surviving member of the GOP who speaks English ?...............
 
For you apparently only deaths that happen while a Dem is president is something to give a **** over.

Only when we are lied to about those deaths and put an innocent man in jail for excising his 1st amendment rights as result of those lies
 
Wow, your president is proving to be Tony Soprano, and you still don't care.

Bull**** hyperbole much?

Erod said:
Your party agreed with Bush, then changed their tune like the spineless wimps they are. Benghazi is just typical of their clueless incompetence.

Oh looky folks... another two party guy who can't see beyond the borders given to him. My party? Dems are nowhere near liberal enough. When the Dems get in line with Senator Bernie Sanders, then you can call them my party.
 
Wow, your president is proving to be Tony Soprano, and you still don't care.

Your party agreed with Bush, then changed their tune like the spineless wimps they are. Benghazi is just typical of their clueless incompetence.



th


Whoa.....WhatsamatterwitU.
slap2.gif
That POS aint nuthin like me. :lol:
 
They're still in the denial stage at this point - there will be anger to follow once they get over being scammed.

LOL !! Hilarious...

This is what gets me. The Democrat intellectual elite, has been sitting around huge highly polished wooden table over the last few days, weeks, feasting on puppies, kittens and the last of several species of highly endangered animals trying to come up with a strategy to counter the growing scandals, you know, so they can go back to ruining the American economy.

And their strategy is to send poor Jay Carney out to repeat that it's some kind of Conservative Conspiracy ? That the IRS Scandal, the wire tapping of the AP, a News Organization that was totally in their corner and the Benghazi scandal were some kind of right wing effort to malign poor Obama ?

And somehow, Holder, Obama and Clinton were all totally detached from all of these scandals ?

Oh hell yea, it's a great strategy.
 
Bull**** hyperbole much?



Oh looky folks... another two party guy who can't see beyond the borders given to him. My party? Dems are nowhere near liberal enough. When the Dems get in line with Senator Bernie Sanders, then you can call them my party.

Oh so your not claiming these fools anymore because they're not corrupt enough ?
 
Johnson is a good man. I'd not mind him as prez even though on many fiscal issues I'd have problems with. Bottom line, I trust the guy. I've been a Nader guy for a loooonnnnng time.



It takes a stronger and stronger person each election to be third party in the face of the sheep so willing to ALWAYS line up with the two parties and face the snobbish down-talk about how your vote doesn't count if you don't vote like they do... such crap. Kudos man!

Yep, with me the bottom line regardless of party, I thought Johnson would make the best president so I voted for him. As for third parties, with the exception of McCain, I have voted third party since 1992. What Perot taught me was to take a few steps back, take off those red or blue deep tinted glasses, stuff cotton into your ears of you do not hear the rhetoric, the talking points, the slogans and just watch how the two parties govern. What I have found out they govern basically the same. So there is differences around the edges, but other than that they might as well be one party.
 
Bull**** hyperbole much?



Oh looky folks... another two party guy who can't see beyond the borders given to him. My party? Dems are nowhere near liberal enough. When the Dems get in line with Senator Bernie Sanders, then you can call them my party.

Bernie Sanders? He's about a lucid as Jung-un.
 
I can't argue with that assessment other than to say that when selecting between bad and worse, bad is always the preferred choice, particularly when you could be surprised by how good bad could be if given a chance.

That is the mentality if we expect better to get out of. There are more parties and candidates out there than just the Republicans and Democrats. Sure they are the major parties, last year each party spent a billion dollars each on their candidates run for the presidency. By contrast Johnson spent 2 million. I am not sure how much Goode spent or my parties candidate, Nigel of the reform party spent. He wasn't on the ballot in Georgia.

It is my opinion, both major parties are so hip deep in owing and rewarding their special interests, lobbyist, super pacs, huge money donors, corporations, wall street, etc for the millions they throw their way in campaign contributions and ads run on their behalf, they barely have time to think of America or the people.

If one expects a good president, then on must be willing to vote for the one whom they think is best, not the least worst candidate.
 
What if it's a journalist working in Iran?

Your point is weak anyway. Why Iran only? That's not the.way laws are written or work. Iran only people, not Iraq, not Pakistan were Osama was hiding, Iran only.

What difference does it make?
 
More insults? Nothing new here.

When a liberal has to resort to personal attacks and insults you know they are losing the argument. For otherworld they lose all arguments because they cant make one without personal attacks or insults
 
That is the mentality if we expect better to get out of. There are more parties and candidates out there than just the Republicans and Democrats. Sure they are the major parties, last year each party spent a billion dollars each on their candidates run for the presidency. By contrast Johnson spent 2 million. I am not sure how much Goode spent or my parties candidate, Nigel of the reform party spent. He wasn't on the ballot in Georgia.

It is my opinion, both major parties are so hip deep in owing and rewarding their special interests, lobbyist, super pacs, huge money donors, corporations, wall street, etc for the millions they throw their way in campaign contributions and ads run on their behalf, they barely have time to think of America or the people.

If one expects a good president, then on must be willing to vote for the one whom they think is best, not the least worst candidate.

I admire your position. However, sometimes the ideal just isn't possible and we have to take the practical course if for no other reason than to save the country and ourselves.
 
Nope. Involved domestic as well. Sorry.

So Obama expanding the program is a good thing? We all know the answer to what your attitude would be if Bush generated the scandals that Obama is now facing.
 
I admire your position. However, sometimes the ideal just isn't possible and we have to take the practical course if for no other reason than to save the country and ourselves.

We are not saving the country by putting the same people back in charge that created and has gotten this country into the mess it is in today. The choice is between which fox, the red fox or the grey fox we let into the hen house. It doesn't matter, the chickens will be in the same peril. The problem is the people listen to the rhetoric, the talking points, the slogans and no one watches how they govern.
 
Bull**** hyperbole much?



Oh looky folks... another two party guy who can't see beyond the borders given to him. My party? Dems are nowhere near liberal enough. When the Dems get in line with Senator Bernie Sanders, then you can call them my party.
Now, now. Everything to the left of center is yours. You own that political real estate, and all the crazy, the corrupt, and the sublime that come with that territory. Just because the rest of the country is to the right of you and Bernie doesn't mean you get a pass. Those of us on the right own the opposite land, and it has all the same characters and features your side has. It's just that right now the spotlight happens to be shining on your side, and it's really quite a show.
 
Back
Top Bottom