- Joined
- Aug 11, 2011
- Messages
- 72,030
- Reaction score
- 43,862
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Are you female for you have a comprehension problem and have to get the last word.
Seriously? In 2013?
Are you female for you have a comprehension problem and have to get the last word.
Seriously? In 2013?
as I said ... we're watching the reruns ... please don't interrupt, except if it's
to tell me that he was impeached ... BTW, saw Romney the other day ... looked good, but a little defeated ...
Seriously, follow the posts of this poster and you will see what I mean.
Nah he's fine. The only thing defeated is the US economy as 60 million morons decided to take MSNBC's word on it and elect a incompetent.
Next time take the 3 minutes of research it would have taken to realize how useless and corrupt the Democrats are.
The millions of American people slipping from Middle Class into poverty would sure appreciate it.
The average GDP growth during years with a Democratic President (5.1%) is nearly three times as great as those with a Republican President (1.8%). The average GDP growth during the entire administrations of these last 12 Presidents is also quite different. The four with the greatest average GDP growth are all Democrats: Roosevelt 6.4%, Truman 6.2%, Kennedy 5.7%, and Johnson 4.2%. The four Presidents whose administrations saw the weakest economic growth were all Republicans: Hoover -7.3%, Bush41 1.9%, Bush43 2.4%, and Eisenhower 2.7%. For simplicity, the economic growth of the entire term is associated with the elected President, for the unfinished terms of Roosevelt and Kennedy.The Bureau of Economic Analysis, a unit of the Department of Commerce, has an extensive data set available on the gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States. The currently available data begins in 1929 and goes through the present. This allows calculation of the change each year. To examine the effect of the political party in the White House to the performance, one can simply look at the average annual GDP growth under Democratic and Republican Presidents. The difference is large.
The period spans the administration of 12 Presidents, beginning with President Herbert Hoover. Conveniently, the number of administrations and the total number of years is equal for the two political parties.
Your opinion noted. How are the IOU's going to be funded with a 17. trillion dollar debt?
The Myth of the Clinton Surplus |
It took me less than 3 minutes to find this..... Maybe you underestimate the American voter and it is the losers that are the morons.
The average GDP growth during years with a Democratic President (5.1%) is nearly three times as great as those with a Republican President (1.8%). The average GDP growth during the entire administrations of these last 12 Presidents is also quite different. The four with the greatest average GDP growth are all Democrats: Roosevelt 6.4%, Truman 6.2%, Kennedy 5.7%, and Johnson 4.2%. The four Presidents whose administrations saw the weakest economic growth were all Republicans: Hoover -7.3%, Bush41 1.9%, Bush43 2.4%, and Eisenhower 2.7%. For simplicity, the economic growth of the entire term is associated with the elected President, for the unfinished terms of Roosevelt and Kennedy.
Economic Growth and Political Parties in the United States - Yahoo! Voices - voices.yahoo.com
It took me less than 3 minutes to find this..... Maybe you underestimate the American voter and it is the losers that are the morons.
The average GDP growth during years with a Democratic President (5.1%) is nearly three times as great as those with a Republican President (1.8%). The average GDP growth during the entire administrations of these last 12 Presidents is also quite different. The four with the greatest average GDP growth are all Democrats: Roosevelt 6.4%, Truman 6.2%, Kennedy 5.7%, and Johnson 4.2%. The four Presidents whose administrations saw the weakest economic growth were all Republicans: Hoover -7.3%, Bush41 1.9%, Bush43 2.4%, and Eisenhower 2.7%. For simplicity, the economic growth of the entire term is associated with the elected President, for the unfinished terms of Roosevelt and Kennedy.
Economic Growth and Political Parties in the United States - Yahoo! Voices - voices.yahoo.com
What your post demonstrates is that Democrats were far more intelligent in the past than they are today. But the left wing education policies and the media changed all of that. Now they are clearly not very bright, and that is a tragedy for the country.
Oh I see... but what is your excuse for the incredibly poor performance of the Republican Presidents? Why do Republicans have so many recessions? I'll take my chances with a Democrat every time. I think many more have got the hint also. Republicans are bad for the economy and that has never changed.
Oh I see... but what is your excuse for the incredibly poor performance of the Republican Presidents? Why do Republicans have so many recessions? I'll take my chances with a Democrat every time. I think many more have got the hint also. Republicans are bad for the economy and that has never changed.
No World War, No Korean War, No Vietnam War.
Nixon ended the Vietnam war, which of course was begun by Democrats. There would have been no Vietnam War were Nixon President.His main argument against ending this war, begun by Democrats, was that Americans would lose credibility if they did not see it through. History has proven him absolutely correct.Richard Nixon presided over the largest portion of the Vietnam war, where was his "war stimulus"?
FYI: It wasn't an "Embassy". At least get the facts straight before you wax poetically those RW talking points.
It took me less than 3 minutes to find this..... Maybe you underestimate the American voter and it is the losers that are the morons.
The average GDP growth during years with a Democratic President (5.1%) is nearly three times as great as those with a Republican President (1.8%). The average GDP growth during the entire administrations of these last 12 Presidents is also quite different. The four with the greatest average GDP growth are all Democrats: Roosevelt 6.4%, Truman 6.2%, Kennedy 5.7%, and Johnson 4.2%. The four Presidents whose administrations saw the weakest economic growth were all Republicans: Hoover -7.3%, Bush41 1.9%, Bush43 2.4%, and Eisenhower 2.7%. For simplicity, the economic growth of the entire term is associated with the elected President, for the unfinished terms of Roosevelt and Kennedy.
Economic Growth and Political Parties in the United States - Yahoo! Voices - voices.yahoo.com
Nixon ended the Vietnam war, which of course was begun by Democrats. There would have been no Vietnam War were Nixon President.His main argument against ending this war, begun by Democrats, was that Americans would lose credibility if they did not see it through. History has proven him absolutely correct.
You should take another three minutes before you post something completely irrelevent....again.
Of course economic growth is "irrelevant" to you. Your side is much more fond of recession. That's why Republicans have so many of them.
Of course economic growth is "irrelevant" to you. Your side is much
more fond of recession. That's why Republicans have so many of them.
If economic growth is so important to you Libs why did you elect Obama ?
It took me less than 3 minutes to find this..... Maybe you underestimate the American voter and it is the losers that are the morons.
The average GDP growth during years with a Democratic President (5.1%) is nearly three times as great as those with a Republican President (1.8%). The average GDP growth during the entire administrations of these last 12 Presidents is also quite different. The four with the greatest average GDP growth are all Democrats: Roosevelt 6.4%, Truman 6.2%, Kennedy 5.7%, and Johnson 4.2%. The four Presidents whose administrations saw the weakest economic growth were all Republicans: Hoover -7.3%, Bush41 1.9%, Bush43 2.4%, and Eisenhower 2.7%. For simplicity, the economic growth of the entire term is associated with the elected President, for the unfinished terms of Roosevelt and Kennedy.
Economic Growth and Political Parties in the United States - Yahoo! Voices - voices.yahoo.com
What do you call it when the Administration authorized talking points that were an attempt to mislead?
Is this the angle you want to come at this with? Really?
I suppose you have some sort of evidence to support this oft repeated (and totally ridiculous) lie?
If you ever want to be taken seriously then you better act more serious.
So Susan Rice wasn't given talking points that the CIA and State Dept. knew weren't true?
I suppose you have some sort of evidence to support this oft repeated (and totally ridiculous) lie?