- Joined
- Feb 2, 2013
- Messages
- 14,520
- Reaction score
- 3,785
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
There, fixed it for you.
There was no need to fix it. I said what meant and meant what I said.
There, fixed it for you.
read the grand jury report. There was specific intent to ignore abortion facilities and deregulate them, because regulation was seen as a deterent to abortion.
It was a policy frst initiated under Ridge that carried over into subsequent administrations
There was no need to fix it. I said what meant and meant what I said.
You won't hear any complaints about me on the first one, really. However, a doctor should take pride in his workspace and, thus, his clinic.
understandable being that you're a libertarian. And if it was an across the board approach to deregulation, then I might be more sympathetic to it,. But I fail to see why a place cutting off skin tabs should be burdened with more oversight than a place performing a much more invasive procedures
But is regulation the answer?
Regulation would have been the answer in the Gosnell case.
How so? NB, that's not a very "conservative" opinion granting the government MORE power to branch out. :shrug:
Yeah, great, you have an opinion on what is "right" and what is "wrong." Woo.
I really have no issue with regulation, in general. My concern is more along the lines of limiting it to where necessary. And in situations where services can have such a direct impact on health, and the consumer is so ill equipped to judge the competency of the people and procedures involved, I think it's more than reasonable
Ever since I was about 7 years old.
Still believe in Santa Clause, too?
Whatever happened to people 1) filing complaints when questionable methods are used.
because no one really seemed to give a crap.
In fact - why doesn't our nation have any such measures to ensure healthier, safer practices nationwide in regard to any form of health care?
they were ignored. Even deaths were not investigated. In fact, local doctors also ignores state law on reporting treatment of abortion related injuries and death
No, there was clear intent to avoid the regulation of abortion clinics, because regulation was seen as a deterent
We do, this place was just regulated less than a guy spending his day removing skin tabs, for political reasons
didn't care enough to do anything.
Insults are a new form of debate?
Wasn't an insult, sorry if you took it as such.
You too would consider it insulting if I asked you whether or not you believe in Santa Claus. Give me a break.
Unless the women were forced to abort without their consent there should not be murder charges. If he did the abortions at a point when they were not allowed then he should face charges for illegal abortions and not for murder. If he was disposing of the remains wrongfully after the abortion procedure then they should nail him for that. The problem is this is not murder, and because of that may get wiped out in appeals because the courts and the anti-abortion extremists want to go way overboard on charges. Whatever ways he broke the law I am fine with charging him for, but I do not think it is murder to abort a baby for a willing mother.
I also think thwese charges were brought as a political step and as vengeance for the anti-abortion crowd who has no real involvement with any of this. No one cared about those babies lives enough to rush in and pay for the pregnancy and commit to raising them in a loving household to avoid the abortions. The right doesn't even want to pay for WIC, school lunches, or SNAP for poor kids who are not responsible for the positions they are born to. They were unwanted children, and that reality would always haunt them. Maybe the right should be a little more appalled by it's own lack of character when it comes to helping disadvantaged kids born to bad circumstances which pretty much leads to a huge reason why many people chose abortion. This guy broke the law regarding abortions and he deserves to be punished for the laws he broke. Abortion is not murder in this country, and it should not be murder anywhere. Since the other stuff seems to be true i am fine with him losing his medical license and jail time for performing abortions at the wrong time, and also his disposal of biohazard waste in a very improper manner if that is true.
I think you should read the grand jury report and familiarize yourself with its particulars.
http://www.phila.gov/districtattorney/pdfs/grandjurywomensmedical.pdf
He killed 3 babies that were born alive.
I am pro-choice, but what this person did was not just an illegal abortion, he performed illegal abortions and then actively killed a baby that may have been viable. That is murder IMHO and he got punished accordingly.
No, they were abortions, though you worked yourself up into an emotional frenzy over it. Seriously, what do you think an abortion is? The mothers are not willing to have or raise the child so they terminate the pregnancy. That will involve an early fetus that is still developing. The fetus doesn't just stop working because the mother chooses to abort. It is removed and that ends whatever cellular functions it has which cause it to be a living part of the mother. What you are claiming is that had he just left the glob on the floor to die it would not be murder, but because he made extra specially sure to help destroy the glob of cells and put a quick end to any functions that might be going on he becomes a murderer. It is an abortion and is not a murder. If you want to have strict and harsh penalties like in murder for abortion doctors who perform later term abortions then make those punishments into law. if you want to lump this in somewhere completely different i hope it gets turned over on appeals because it is a dangerous precedent and gives much more power to the government to try you for crimes you never committed.
you are one sick and twisted individual does this look like a glob of cells to youNo, they were abortions, though you worked yourself up into an emotional frenzy over it. Seriously, what do you think an abortion is? The mothers are not willing to have or raise the child so they terminate the pregnancy. That will involve an early fetus that is still developing. The fetus doesn't just stop working because the mother chooses to abort. It is removed and that ends whatever cellular functions it has which cause it to be a living part of the mother. What you are claiming is that had he just left the glob on the floor to die it would not be murder, but because he made extra specially sure to help destroy the glob of cells and put a quick end to any functions that might be going on he becomes a murderer. It is an abortion and is not a murder. If you want to have strict and harsh penalties like in murder for abortion doctors who perform later term abortions then make those punishments into law. if you want to lump this in somewhere completely different i hope it gets turned over on appeals because it is a dangerous precedent and gives much more power to the government to try you for crimes you never committed.