• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republican expects more Benghazi 'whistle blowers'

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
"I do think we're going to see more whistle blowers. I certainly know my committee has been contacted," Representative Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said in an interview on "Fox News Sunday".

Republican expects more Benghazi 'whistle blowers' | Reuters
B'dah bim... B'dah bam... B'dah BOOM!

The coverup is worse than the crime. Watergate Hillary should have told Hillary and Hillary should have told Obama... Just say no.

For the record... I am watching European news and CNNi for the last week and there hasn't been ONE WORD about either Benghazi or the IRS Scandal. And you wonder why Europeans (Not Brits) are fully ignorant?
 
Last edited:
B'dah bim... B'dah bam... B'dah BOOM!

The coverup is worse than the crime. Watergate Hillary should have told Hillary and Hillary should have told Obama... Just say no.

For the record... I am watching European news and CNNi for the last week and there hasn't been ONE WORD about either Benghazi or the IRS Scandal. And you wonder why Europeans (Not Brits) are fully ignorant?

Why should Europeans have 24/7 coverage of Benghazi to appease your partisan desires?
 
Why should Europeans have 24/7 coverage of Benghazi to appease your partisan desires?

Maybe because during the Bush years everything was broadcasted to appease your partisan desires.
 
Why should Europeans have 24/7 coverage of Benghazi to appease your partisan desires?

You mean, instead of ignoring it for YOUR partisan desires?

It's called covering the freaking news. This is WAY worse than Watergate ever thought about being. Off the scale worse. It's a mammoth story that the MSM is trying to run away from, but it slowly giving up.
 
B'dah bim... B'dah bam... B'dah BOOM!

The coverup is worse than the crime. Watergate Hillary should have told Hillary and Hillary should have told Obama... Just say no.

For the record... I am watching European news and CNNi for the last week and there hasn't been ONE WORD about either Benghazi or the IRS Scandal. And you wonder why Europeans (Not Brits) are fully ignorant?

What's the coverup, has anyone decided what it is?
 
It's called covering the freaking news.

EUROPE is not AMERICA which means news stories relevant to AMERICA are not as often transmitted in EUROPE.

I know we're not past 2 plus 2 Erod but I'm hoping that the concept of continents is not too hard for you to comprehend.

Maybe because during the Bush years everything was broadcasted to appease your partisan desires.

Still pissed about Europeans not supporting an idiotic war in Iraq eh?

Sour grapes.

All I'm trying to say is...

A: Why the hell are we still believing anything Zimmer says?

B: Why the hell would Europe focus on an American centric story that has nothing to do with them?
 
EUROPE is not AMERICA which means news stories relevant to AMERICA are not as often transmitted in EUROPE.

I know we're not past 2 plus 2 Erod but I'm hoping that the concept of continents is not too hard for you to comprehend.



Still pissed about Europeans not supporting an idiotic war in Iraq eh?

Sour grapes.

All I'm trying to say is...

A: Why the hell are we still believing anything Zimmer says?

B: Why the hell would Europe focus on an American centric story that has nothing to do with them?
Just mindless, condescending, drivel.

This is an impeachable offense, which should at least mildly interest a continent that remains militarily dependent on the United States. As a Canadian, so should you.
 
Before addressing the following, it is amazing to watch the Leftists implode. They never had much in the way of morals, but now they're proving they've got even less than what many had previously believed.

Why should Europeans have 24/7 coverage of Benghazi to appease your partisan desires?

Need not have 24/7... wasn't asking for 24/7... it was merely a reflection of the Euro news networks and why the Europeans are quite ignorant on the whole.

But Jet... it was a nice try.

For an update: Finally saw CNNi address the issue and what did they do? Did they show Hicks, did they interview anyone claiming this is a mess that goes right up to Obama? Nope.
They showed about 40 seconds of Obama and the Socialists of Amerika Partei (SAPs) talking points.

Now that is news you can trust! ROTFLOL...

Compare that to the following and tell me who is better informed, and who is the definition of ignorant?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom