• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

LIVE on C-SPAN3: U.S. Consulate Attack in Benghazi, Libya

No thanks, I'm watching paint dry. Definitely more interesting.
 
lol, and you started the other thread on Benghazi....

I see how you roll.
 
StringBean said:
A well-informed citizenry...damn delusional Founders.
Click to expand...

'
Informed is great, but really, C-Span is boring. C-Span 3 triply so.

BTW, what happens to the well-informed citizenry when they don't have cable?
 
I have better things to do than to pretend 4 deaths were the worst thing that ever happened to this country. But I am sure we will get play by warped play from the tinfoil hat crowd.

I am sure when the witness who said Obama told the terrorists to attack while also ordering the military to assist them in killing the embassador speaks we will hear all about it. It is a good think the military refused to nuke the consulate like obama ordered them to while he was spooning hillary on a pile of cocaine. Talk about your crazy coke binge blunders, what were they thinking?
 
rocket88 said:
'
Informed is great, but really, C-Span is boring. C-Span 3 triply so.

BTW, what happens to the well-informed citizenry when they don't have cable?
Click to expand...

They read transcripts of the hearing and draw their own conclusions
 
tererun said:
I have better things to do than to pretend 4 deaths were the worst thing that ever happened to this country. But I am sure we will get play by warped play from the tinfoil hat crowd.

I am sure when the witness who said Obama told the terrorists to attack while also ordering the military to assist them in killing the embassador speaks we will hear all about it. It is a good think the military refused to nuke the consulate like obama ordered them to while he was spooning hillary on a pile of cocaine. Talk about your crazy coke binge blunders, what were they thinking?
Click to expand...

Indeed...just think, it could have been a hotel room breakin.
 
tererun said:
I have better things to do than to pretend 4 deaths were the worst thing that ever happened to this country. But I am sure we will get play by warped play from the tinfoil hat crowd.

I am sure when the witness who said Obama told the terrorists to attack while also ordering the military to assist them in killing the embassador speaks we will hear all about it. It is a good think the military refused to nuke the consulate like obama ordered them to while he was spooning hillary on a pile of cocaine. Talk about your crazy coke binge blunders, what were they thinking?
Click to expand...

If you put in half as much effort to understand the real circumstances of the attack than you did to post this hypothetical nonsense...maybe there would be hope for this country
 
This is what i got out of the hearing: "Republican Party, Party of truth since September 11, 2012"
 
hfd said:
Indeed...just think, it could have been a hotel room breakin.
Click to expand...

yes, i know they wish it was as important as that, but as we have seen through state department ooopsies throughout many administrations people die from lax security and attacks all the time in foreign countries.
 
StringBean said:
If you put in half as much effort to understand the real circumstances of the attack than you did to post this hypothetical nonsense...maybe there would be hope for this country
Click to expand...

If you put half as much effort into actually finding a respectable and honest candidate for your party instead of hoping blowing this way out of proportion would make the US elect one of the POS that the republican party ran during the last election you might actually help the country. Benghazi is nothing, and you are part of the problem for trying to distract the country from it's real problems with this nonsense.
 
tererun said:
If you put half as much effort into actually finding a respectable and honest candidate for your party instead of hoping blowing this way out of proportion would make the US elect one of the POS that the republican party ran during the last election you might actually help the country. Benghazi is nothing, and you are part of the problem for trying to distract the country from it's real problems with this nonsense.
Click to expand...

It's not my responsibility to tell the Republican Party who to nominate for the presidency.

Romney in fact went easy on Obama in the last debate, rather than push hard into him on Benghazi. He was a gentleman in a game of scumbags.

The best help I can offer my country is to not exclude information or hearings that might bother my ideological predisposition.

Growth, you see, is what I seek. Not the cut-and-dry fed to me by either side controlling our system.
 
StringBean said:
It's not my responsibility to tell the Republican Party who to nominate for the presidency.
Click to expand...

As a self defined con you do send that message. When you will vote for any dishonest POS in front of you like rick Sanford that shows the republicans theft of public funds and infidelity with a argentinian hooker don't mean anything to your base. When you send messages like that you get your party running the gallery of nitwits they ran for the last presidential election. When you hope that some manufactured scandal like benghazi will overcome an incumbent with a relatively decent record when compared to the last few presidents while running a corrupt and open liar like Romney wo contradicted himself in the same sentence many times, it just shows people you are actually a big part of the problem, and you don't care about the country as much as you care about a popularity contest.
StringBean said:
Romney in fact went easy on Obama in the last debate, rather than push hard into him on Benghazi. He was a gentleman in a game of scumbags.
Click to expand...

Oh my, you really do buy the BS, don't you? Romney had nothing but benghazi. Obamacare was really romneycare. Romney was an actual direct outsourcer of jobs to foreign markets. He was a rich guy who took advantage of multiple forms of corporate welfare. He could not even hit Obama on his black church weakness because he was a mormon. They ran a terrible guy, and the worst part about it was he was actually the best guy they had. One of the two national parties with a huge selection of people to chose from could only find the **** they put into the primaries? Those guys don't even pretend to be honest and good people. Of course, you continue to support them. You do not insist on better. If they had run someone in the range of good they would have beaten Obama. Instead they ran their most corrupt morons and hoped they could badmouth an incumbent into a loss.
StringBean said:
The best help I can offer my country is to not exclude information or hearings that might bother my ideological predisposition.
Click to expand...

You seem to think people want to cover things up because you bought the lie. We don't care because we already know what happened. 4 people in a shack in libya is not secure. We know the US thought it could get away with a pathetic consulate like that. They took the risk to take the cheapo route and get some reps in there before they were in a place where they could defend. They are not the first to do it, and they won't be the last. We know why the consulate fell, and we know the reason it was established so haphazardly. Having a trial on it at this point doesn't do much to make sure it doesn't happen again. if they want to fund the state department more, or perhaps cut back state department activities in hostile countries where we do not have the funding or support to protect our people I am all for either of those. However, a solution is not part of any of this. it is the blame game. It is pretending if we point the finger at obama and his administration and blame them this will never happen again. Well, since pointing the finger at obama doesn't actually correct the problem it will happen again.
StringBean said:
Growth, you see, is what I seek. Not the cut-and-dry fed to me by either side controlling our system.
Click to expand...

Bl;ame is what you seek, because growth would require a solution which is not any part of this entire benghazi BS. There is no demand for any solution that would help to make anything more secure in the future. All you want is for someone to say it is obama's fault and then you can go back to blissfully ignoring the problems again.
 
StringBean said:
lol, and you started the other thread on Benghazi....

I see how you roll.
Click to expand...

Yes, I started that thread -- on 11/2/12, six months ago.

You see how I roll, posting the most current information AVAILABLE AT THAT TIME,
 
rocket88 said:
Yes, I started that thread -- on 11/2/12, six months ago.

You see how I roll, posting the most current information AVAILABLE AT THAT TIME,
Click to expand...

Fair enough. Dunno who drug up such an old thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom