- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 15,483
- Reaction score
- 8,227
- Location
- North Texas
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Re: There was a stand down order given in Benghzi
Wow, you people are so prebuscently naive.
The entire Middle Eastern region is frought with factions and dictators trying to develop or get their hands on WMDs. They were then, and they are now. We're in a steady walk to a massive conflict - the WMD kind of conflict - and it is only a mere matter of time. Probably sooner than later, in fact.
So imagine if we would have gone into the heart of the Middle East and set up a staging camp to deal with this eventuality. They just bombed the twin towers and our MILITARY HEADQUARTERS. They had been sponsored and protected by Hussein, who has used chemical weapons on hundreds of thousands of his own people already, as had others like him. We KNOW he is seeking WMDs. He probably already has them. Every faction of our intelligence says so, as well as the intelligence of our allies.
Of course, when you spend nine months appeasing the UN with endless speeches on the subject before going into Iraq.....somebody might move or destroy them. Regardless, the presence of WMD was immaterial for anyone with half a brain. You've got to attack cancer aggressively, whether it's in Stage 1 or Stage 4. We did, and Bush should be applauded for it. Things would be HORRIBLY worse now if he didn't. If anything, he waited far too long after 9/11.
To some, that is common sense. To liberals, the sitation should have been handled with a little kumbaya, education, and understanding for our poor, fellow, misunderstood Muslim radicals. They just needed a hug. America just needed to mend its mean ways so they would promise not to do it anymore.
Same with Syria. Surely Assad wouldn't gas his own people. That's just not what people do, unless they're Christians, who all wear hoods and burn crosses in people's front yards. We just need to sit down with Assad and talk about our feelings. Let's smoke some weed with him and get him laid. A little partying will solve this. Let's make the rich people give him some money!
It is mind-numbing the lengths liberals will go to just to defend those that hate us or threaten the balance of peace. The short-sightedness is dumbfounding.
Good golly, well that just proves everything! :roll:
The decision to go into Iraq was on false, made-up premises. The evidence is all there and not difficult to find out. You can choose to bury your head in the sand or seek the truth. If you choose to live off those quotes, then by golly, you chose to stay uninformed.
What I see in the thread is false outrage and I can't help but roll my eyes when so many Republicans are up in arms about Benghazi, but choose to remain silent when it comes to Iraq. The hypocracy is just too much for me.
Wow, you people are so prebuscently naive.
The entire Middle Eastern region is frought with factions and dictators trying to develop or get their hands on WMDs. They were then, and they are now. We're in a steady walk to a massive conflict - the WMD kind of conflict - and it is only a mere matter of time. Probably sooner than later, in fact.
So imagine if we would have gone into the heart of the Middle East and set up a staging camp to deal with this eventuality. They just bombed the twin towers and our MILITARY HEADQUARTERS. They had been sponsored and protected by Hussein, who has used chemical weapons on hundreds of thousands of his own people already, as had others like him. We KNOW he is seeking WMDs. He probably already has them. Every faction of our intelligence says so, as well as the intelligence of our allies.
Of course, when you spend nine months appeasing the UN with endless speeches on the subject before going into Iraq.....somebody might move or destroy them. Regardless, the presence of WMD was immaterial for anyone with half a brain. You've got to attack cancer aggressively, whether it's in Stage 1 or Stage 4. We did, and Bush should be applauded for it. Things would be HORRIBLY worse now if he didn't. If anything, he waited far too long after 9/11.
To some, that is common sense. To liberals, the sitation should have been handled with a little kumbaya, education, and understanding for our poor, fellow, misunderstood Muslim radicals. They just needed a hug. America just needed to mend its mean ways so they would promise not to do it anymore.
Same with Syria. Surely Assad wouldn't gas his own people. That's just not what people do, unless they're Christians, who all wear hoods and burn crosses in people's front yards. We just need to sit down with Assad and talk about our feelings. Let's smoke some weed with him and get him laid. A little partying will solve this. Let's make the rich people give him some money!
It is mind-numbing the lengths liberals will go to just to defend those that hate us or threaten the balance of peace. The short-sightedness is dumbfounding.