- Joined
- Aug 19, 2012
- Messages
- 4,905
- Reaction score
- 1,578
- Location
- The darkside of the moon
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
This thread isn't about 9/11 so please stop trying to take this thread off in to another direction.
If you want to start a thread about who dropped the ball or who's policies allowed 9/11 happen or why Osama bin Laden thought he could get away with attacking America on it's own soil, start a new thread. I'll be more than happy to participate. I'll probably start where the first mistakes were made, back in 1976.
We are discuassing the reasons you people are freaking out over something that you never cared about before, and are blowing up four deaths when you actually passed by 4000 deaths less than a decade ago while cheering on the person who covered things up regarding them, including his complacency in them. Your motives for outrage are directly related to your ignoring of explanation of what happened in benghazi, and why you are continuing to make an issue out of something that is pretty normal for an administration. yes, i said it is normal for an administration to suffer attacks that kill state department people on foreign soil. It has happened to the best administrations, and it will happen in the future.
You have made a tremendous issue out of something you don't really care about, and that is ceertainly part of the multiple threads on this BS at this point. I could accept it way back in October when you were trying to make holes in Obama's campaign. Now there is no purpose to be campaigning against Obama. He cannot win the next election. mittens romnifeller will not win 2012 no matter how many times you say benghazi now. You are not even offering up any new information or even a new theory. We still know the same thing we did a week after the attack. There is no new news at all. . You could have put this is the old benghazi threads, but you had to make a whole bunch of new ones to pretend there is something here. So yes i am going to point out your motivations and lack of consistency in your complaints as part of the reason why you are making such an issue out of somet5hing you normally would just pass on by.
Otherwise keep to the topic, Benghazi; 4 dead Americans; U.S. military being told to stand down while that attack was occurring;
Like i said, you don't care about this because stand down orders were given on 9/11 and that was never a concern of yours. So this little bit of outrage is faux outrage considering there were 3k deaths in 2001 and you did not care at all.
British FAF asking the Americans if they could go in and rescue the Americans and not receiving any response;
Maybe they did not know what exactly was going on at the time and launching an attack into a sovereign foreign country is not what they wanted to do. yes, i know military action and damning the consequences of sending in troops into another country is something you feel is OK, but other countries tend to frown upon use of force in that manner. Yes, that means sometimes people in a foreign country will die because we respect borders.
Hillary Clinton dereliction of duty; Barack Obama dereliction of duty as Cn'C;
Feel free to show us something that actually applies here. Not just something you wish was an actual dereliction of duty, but something that can be proven to be. Your interpretation of the law is pretty shaky considering your clear bias as shown by your lack of any response to past incidents that have been far more severe than this. So i am going to require a little more than you just claiming there is something there based on your outlandish opinion. There are things called laws with definitions for crimes. Feel free to post what actual laws these two violated, and to show why they should be prosecuted for them. Also, you might want to post some motivations because negligence is not actually dereliction of duty. Just because something went wrong does not mean someone shirked their duties. So please make your case with something aside from your rabid hate of the obama admin. Then I could actually focus on something you said that has a rebuttal instead of just pointing out your hypocritical opinions for what they are.
Why two weeks of lying to the American people that it was all about a You Tube video;
It was less than a week before they realized the video was not the reason, and people asked them for their theories as to why the attack happened and they gave them their ideas at the time. Unless you are going to make a claim that Obama was omnipotent and therefor does not suffer from the need to investigate to find out the truth, you have no real complaint here. Actually i think 2 weeks is pretty good considering it was in a country and a place we didn't have much access to at the time. If you are really angry at the confusion perhaps you should blame the filmmaker who sent egypt into an uproar with his terrible film and obscured the real reason behind these attacks.
Who was inside the White House situation room watching live feed of the attack on the consulate;
Ok, were they snorting coke in the room, or playing keep away with dick cheney's new heart? Did some sort of crime occur in that place and time that we should know about?
Why was Al Qaeda operating in Libya when Obama said Al Qaeda was on the run and was being decimated ?
Because they are a terrorist organization who has cells in many countries and is not just in one place? You do know what terrorism is, right? You do know that they don't just happen in afganistan, right?