• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Officials: Boston suspect had no firearm when barrage of bullets hit hiding place

K

katsung47

Banned
Joined
Mar 13, 2011
Messages
879
Reaction score
128
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
O
fficials:Boston suspect had no firearm when barrage of bullets hit hiding place

By Sari Horwitz and Peter Finn,

Although police feared he was heavily armed, the suspect in the BostonMarathon bombing had no firearms when he came under a barrage of police gunfirethat struck the boat where he was hiding, according to multiple federal lawenforcement officials.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/officials-boston-suspect-had-no-firearm-when-barrage-of-bullets-hit-hiding-place/2013/04/24/376fc8a0-ad18-11e2-a8b9-2a63d75b5459_story.html
Click to expand...

I wonder how could he shot his throat in a "suicide" attempt.
 
They should have just taken the hose and filled that boat with water, that would have brought that little ahole right out of there.
 
Now officials claim Boston bombing suspect was NOT armed in boat showdown - despite police account of firefight and him 'shooting himself'

Officials now claim that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was unarmed as he hid in boat in Watertown
Contradicts Boston Police Commissioner's account of hour-long firefight with Tsarnaev
New York Times said M4 rifle had been found on boat
Police sources suggested Tsarnaev shot himself onboard

By Associated Press and Daily Mail Reporter

PUBLISHED:20:53 EST, 24 April 2013

Read more: Now officials claim Boston bombing suspect was NOT armed in boat showdown - despite police account of firefight and him 'shooting himself' | Mail Online
Click to expand...

That's a news - five days of a big event. Five days - enough for them to make a perfect story. When this site request mainstream news within two days, that's the news from Mainstream media.
 
Reading comments on The Washington Post one would think the terrorists were the real heroes of the day.

It's sad.
 
Dapper Andy said:
Reading comments on The Washington Post one would think the terrorists were the real heroes of the day.

It's sad.
Click to expand...

According to their mother, AMERICA destroyed her sons.

We just need to accept that.(s) :cool:
 
Curious. He must have tried to kill himself earlier or had been struck through the mouth in one of his earlier exchanges of gunfire and then dumped the gun, possibly being out of ammo at that point.
 
I would assume it's fairly easy for today's forensic analysts to determine the type of weapon that pierced his throat for the entry and exit wounds and if the bullet lodged, that would provide the exact detail needed. Secondly, you don't attempt suicide and then get up and climb out of a boat. Finally, has anyone ever heard of someone attempting suicide by shooting themselves in the throat, seriously?
 
WCH said:
According to their mother, AMERICA destroyed her sons.

We just need to accept that.(s) :cool:
Click to expand...

Fine, let Russia have and deal with her. She doesn't need to come pick up the bodies, we'll mail her the ashes, with a big steaming surprise laid on the top.

From what's been revealed thus far - she's the one that steered the older son back to [radical] Islam. She's the one that thought it was a good idea to have radical Misha hanging around and steering her son. She wants to know what went wrong, she has only to look in the mirror.
 
who cares like! If they had put him on his knees and shot him in the head I wouldn't of cried about it.
 
They barely had any ammo and one gun, another gun was taken from the cop they killed. These guys just seem like idiots. And I would guess the gun they did have wasn't very powerful.
 
Fisher said:
Curious. He must have tried to kill himself earlier or had been struck through the mouth in one of his earlier exchanges of gunfire and then dumped the gun, possibly being out of ammo at that point.
Click to expand...

He became a pacifist at the end. :lol:
 
We're lucky he's alive for questioning. It must have been all the feds could do to keep the Boston police department from making Swiss cheese out of him.
 
This story told us the media could turn a man into a woman, or an innocent man into a criminal. They could go on with the story that Dzhokhar died in hospital you still would take it. Now they change the story because a living man's "confession" is more "true" then a dead man"s. So you saw this abrupt turn out.
 
Well, dumb asses. Even old "Two-Shoot" Biden would have been better armed.
 
EnigmaO01 said:
We're lucky he's alive for questioning. It must have been all the feds could do to keep the Boston police department from making Swiss cheese out of him.
Click to expand...

It's not the police I was worried about killing dsokhar, but the people of Boston. They would have killed him for vengeance.
 
My opinion of the situation doesn't change. Had he been shot dead by the police, I would have lamented the loss of possible information, but I wouldn't shed a tear for a man responsible for the deaths and injuries of others. When you show yourself to be a dangerous person, then you're just going to have to deal with the reality of being shot.
WCH said:
Has anyone seen any description of firearms used by the two?

Seems to me the lamestream would be all over such questions.
Click to expand...
Why would they be all over the description of guns when bombs were used in the attack?
 
"Why would they be all over the description of guns when bombs were used in the attack?"


With all the hoopla over firearms lately, do I really need to answer that question? (aside from the fact they were involved in at least 2 *shootouts* [according to news reports])
 
WCH said:
"Why would they be all over the description of guns when bombs were used in the attack?"


With all the hoopla over firearms lately, do I really need to answer that question? (aside from the fact they were involved in at least 2 *shootouts* [according to news reports])
Click to expand...

Yes. I'm very curious how it is relevant.
 
WCH said:
You would have to ask the media. I was simply pointing out the lack of interest in the firearms that WERE used after the bombings.
Click to expand...

I'm supposed to ask the media why something they didn't care about is something they consider relevant? That doesn't make any sense.
 
Fisher said:
Curious. He must have tried to kill himself earlier or had been struck through the mouth in one of his earlier exchanges of gunfire and then dumped the gun, possibly being out of ammo at that point.
Click to expand...

it is hard to find these days
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom