1.)There would also likely be their observation and treatments of the patients in question.
2.) But even just multiple complaints, from a number of different patients, would seem to more than justify reporting such to the authorities.
Such reporting isn't some huge burden
3.)right, no one claimed they were. What was claimed was that they had a professional and moral obligation to report such to the complaint department
4.)well, we would need to look at a situation with multiple complaints from a number of different individuals to the point they were encouraging women to file a complaint with the department of health, and one sole complaint that may simply involve style of treatment (nothing actually illegal or actionable).
5.)If you want to claim that multiple complaints from eye witnesses and victims do not amount to reason for concern there is no point in continuing this discussion.
6.)Also, hearsay would be second hand accounts, not accounts by eyewitnesses
really this long post in hopes of changing the fact that PP wasnt factually aware of any wrong doing? LOL
the thread title is currently factually not CURRENTLY true.
ill play for a little while but the facts arent going to change, you are free to have any opinion you like but thats all it is.
1.) maybe, i see no facts to support this.
if 5 different patients came in and had their legs removed when they needed their arms removed (just an example) of course that would probably warrant some investigation but i see nothing that suggests this happened.
2.) you are welcome to this opinion but nothing makes it fact and nothing makes the thread title fact
3.) again, opinion based on what we know, per what what we know they had no facts to report, they did tell the woman if they have complaints what they should do.
4.) I agree which is why the thread title isnt true and it seems they meet their legal obligations as far as we have evidence of
5.) its not a claim its factual unless you can prove otherwise, who said PP had no concern? they did what they should have, told the woman to file complaints, so feel free to end the discussion because my point that i actually said still stands and what you are trying to have a debate about is meaningless to anythign i said.
the thread title is currently not true, that could change but currently there's no evidence to support it and as far as anybody knows PP was not factually aware of anything besides complaints.
6.) also hearsay can in fact be Information received from other people that cannot be adequately substantiated, Unverified information heard or received from another.
https://www.google.com/search?num=3...SBueM0QGz-YGwCg&ved=0CDEQkQ4&biw=1582&bih=829
hearsay - definition of hearsay by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
now in court you would be right, but a check-up room at PP is not a court room, so in this case the term is 100% accurate.
what the people said was hearsay and nothing more.
Let me know if you want to discuss what i actually said because i couldnt care less about your opinion that they should have reported the hearsay to somebody. You are free to have it.