• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Senators push for military aid for Syrian rebels

donsutherland1

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
11,862
Reaction score
10,300
Location
New York
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
From Reuters:

U.S. senators, including some of President Barack Obama's fellow Democrats, pushed the White House on Thursday to shift its policy and provide lethal military assistance to rebels waging a civil war against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad...
"Shouldn't we do something to prevent this massive slaughter that's going on?" Senator John McCain asked during a heated exchange that ended with the Arizona Republican walking out of the hearing. He did so while Elizabeth Jones, the acting assistant secretary of state for near eastern affairs was replying to one of his questions.

Senators push for military aid for Syrian rebels | Reuters

Several questions are applicable:

1. Have the anti-Assad elements provided a framework by which Syria would have a government that would respect the rights of all citizens?
2. Have the anti-Assad elements provided credible guarantees that they would not engage in retribution and other abuses should they prevail?
3. Have the anti-Assad elements provided tangible guarantees that they would govern in a fashion compatible with U.S. regional interests?
4. Have the anti-Assad elements committed to distancing themselves from Iran and severing ties with such regional terrorist organizations as Hezbollah and Hamas?
5. Have the anti-Assad elements pledged to adopt a flexible approach and to seek a peace agreement with Israel?

The answer to every one of those questions is negative. They have provided no such commitments or assurances. Consequently, one simply cannot make the argument that aiding the anti-Assad elements would serve U.S. interests any status quo Syria does. Hence, I do not believe the U.S. should intervene directly or indirectly. No critical U.S. interests or those of its regional allies are at stake.
 
I think the US has a bad legacy of supporting rebels and military groups that fight against regimes we don't like simply because we want them out of power. If the rebels and proposed government are not in line with our interests we should not be getting involved or sending over money.
 
Back
Top Bottom