Not below 400ft. They that low they in trouble of some kind.
What an upside down world we live in today....The debate over gun control rages on....People are being drawn into supporting taking peoples private property to distribute to the collective...Rights, once proclaimed by our constitution granted us by God, are now determined, and given/taken by man....
And PETA wants to stalk, and harass legal hunters with drones....These people are just plain nuts. I'd shoot it down.
Not the case with UAVs.
Unless drones are banned by the FAA, or whoever manages that particular park: You're gonna have drones there anyway. They could be operated by drone enthusiasts, photographers, park management, map services companies, and so forth. Might want to get used to it.
If PETA interferes with a legal hunt, I'd disapprove of it. Until it actually happens, my sympathies for poachers are basically zero.
And really, the more I think about it, the less this seems like an actual viable policy and more like a way to get attention. A drone with a 20- or 40-minute flight time won't be all that effective. Your outrage has brought them more attention, which is probably what they really want in the first place. So... good job! :mrgreen:
Your hunting lodge is a public place? Your hundred acre farm is a public place?
At least, for now, that is not true.
FYI, the PETA drone that got shot down was intent on harrassing a pigeon shoot on a private site. It was trespassing. The shoot was legal, drone was not.,
Just think of yourselves as celebrities and drones are your paparazzi. It's tough to prove just observing someone in a public place is "harassment".