• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Texas DA, wife killed -- 2 months after his deputy is gunned down [W:627]

And even funnier is your need to resort to ad homs

Always a sign that someone has lost

Well then, why don't you tell me what any of this has to do with the OP. That would be a good start to getting back on topic. Don't you think?
 
I am not above it all.. but I am most assuredly above you and the other 2 musketeers.

I'm sure you believe i'm a right winger...lots of folks only acknowledge the left or right, forsaking all other possibilities.
The giveaway, the tell, is what one wants to deny.....and brother, we have seen the denial here.
 
Read the thread.

I have, and I don't see what connection you are trying to make with all of your right wing comments. Please connect the dots for me. Thanks in advance! :)
 
Well then, why don't you tell me what any of this has to do with the OP. That would be a good start to getting back on topic. Don't you think?
No one is stopping you from "getting back to the topic"...at all.
 
Read the thread.

I mean if you truly wanted to have a civil adult conversation about it, you wouldn't have a problem with explaining exactly where you are coming from with all of this.
 
I have, and I don't see what connection you are trying to make with all of your right wing comments. Please connect the dots for me. Thanks in advance! :)
Seriously, if you don't understand the dynamic of the argument between (primarily) calamity, Sangha and myself, then you have not read the thread.
 
Seriously, if you don't understand the dynamic of the argument between (primarily) calamity, Sangha and myself, then you have not read the thread.

Seriously, let's get on topic and you tell me what the connection is. Is it a big secret? Does it take TOO long to explain it because of all the complicated implications? Inquiring minds want to know!
 
No you are not, you are arguing with us about our discussion. That is not the topic.

How is asking you to explain your angle arguing? :confused: This is a DEBATE site. Lol. You're very funny! :lol:
 
The giveaway, the tell, is what one wants to deny.....and brother, we have seen the denial here.

I love it when people pretend to know more about my personal politics than I do.... it entertains me to see such ignorant arrogance at work.

so tell me, what makes me a right winger in your book?
 
It's an example of rightwing terrorism

How so? Were there political motives? Maybe it was even a hate crime? :shock:
 
Seriously, let's get on topic and you tell me what the connection is. Is it a big secret? Does it take TOO long to explain it because of all the complicated implications? Inquiring minds want to know!
Wait, you want to get to what you think is the topic, arguing that we are not on topic.....but now you want to join in?

You are a mess, make up your mind.
 
I love it when people pretend to know more about my personal politics than I do.... it entertains me to see such ignorant arrogance at work.

so tell me, what makes me a right winger in your book?
I just did.

Do you always require two attempts at the same question?
 
How is asking you to explain your angle arguing? :confused: This is a DEBATE site. Lol. You're very funny! :lol:

You are arguing that this part of the discussion is off topic and partisan when the truth is, you don't know what you're talking about
 
Wait, you want to get to what you think is the topic, arguing that we are not on topic.....but now you want to join in?

You are a mess, make up your mind.

LOL! That's exactly what I'm asking you to explain. How does all of this relate to the OP. Once you explain your angle, then I can join the conversation with the knowledge of where you are coming from. I don't think that's unreasonable at all.
 
You are arguing that this part of the discussion is off topic and partisan when the truth is, you don't know what you're talking about

Wrong. I'm asking you to explain to me how it relates to the topic. Simple really.
 
How is asking you to explain your angle arguing? :confused: This is a DEBATE site. Lol. You're very funny! :lol:
You just said you read the thread....but you need me to repeat what I have already made clear?

You are not very clever.
 
Wrong. I'm asking you to explain to me how it relates to the topic. Simple really.
There you go again....."I read the thread"....apparently, not very well.
 
Wait, you want to get to what you think is the topic, arguing that we are not on topic.....but now you want to join in?

You are a mess, make up your mind.

Hmmmm. You can't explain yourself and are getting all snarky, yet I'm the one who's a mess? Interesting.
 
How so? Were there political motives? Maybe it was even a hate crime? :shock:

No, there is no reason to believe it was a hate crime, which BTW, you say you don't believe in.

And if the AB committed it, then they did so for political reasons (ie to intimidate the govt)

But you would know this if you had actually informed yourself by reading the thread instead of making baseless accusations based on ignorance of what was being discussed and why
 
You just said you read the thread....but you need me to repeat what I have already made clear?

You are not very clever.

Perhaps I'm not, so please explain your angle here.
 
Hmmmm. You can't explain yourself and are getting all snarky, yet I'm the one who's a mess? Interesting.
Again, if you read the thread as you claim you did, you would not need me to explain...at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom