• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Texas DA, wife killed -- 2 months after his deputy is gunned down [W:627]

Gimmesometruth said:
Again, i'll type this slowly......I did not make the laws, and my pointing out that laws against sexual acts created by social conservatives....is not my doing either.

Still waiting for you to get that simple set of ideas.
Click to expand...

I didn't say you created the laws.... I said you'd make a blowjob a partisan issue.... and you did not disappoint.

I'm done with this tangent... you were played.. you lost, get over it and move on.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Except....that the AB holds to all of those same viewpoints.....which is still the point.
Click to expand...
Ah. Ok. My understanding is the racial purity part of the gang is just BS. They use it to recruit. And, like the Mafia, no outsiders need apply. The bottom line though is they are about drugs and money.
 
Thrilla said:
I didn't say you created the laws.... I said you'd make a blowjob a partisan issue.... and you did not disappoint.

I'm done with this tangent... you were played.. you lost, get over it and move on.
Click to expand...
You still just can't get it, I did not make it a partisan issue, that happened centuries ago by social conservatives, you apparently just can't accept this this very basic point and still try to pin it on me....now...here in the 21st century.

Again, "libertarians" are so weak on history.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Except....that the AB holds to all of those same viewpoints.....which is still the point.
Click to expand...

the point is that everybody here.. including your fellow liberals.. can see what you are doing.

everybody knows you are being a partisan hack... trying to equate the tea party with the Aryan brotherhood is an exercise in intellectual retardation.

you are pulling the same old "guilt by association" bull**** every feebleminded hack tries to pull at one point or another.

grow the **** up.... the only poli-sci aspect to the story is the one you are trying to concoct, hack.
 
calamity said:
Ah. Ok. My understanding is the racial purity part of the gang is just BS. They use it to recruit. And, like the Mafia, no outsiders need apply. The bottom line though is they are about drugs and money.
Click to expand...
There is no denying that they are about "drugs and money", but as throughout this discussion, you want to ignore the poli-sci aspect, which you are free to do, until it comes to debating my point.

Your denial still doesn't change the fact that they are US domestic rw terrorists when they start assassinating Texas govt officials.
 
Thrilla said:
you are being a partisan hack... trying to equate the tea party with the Aryan brotherhood is an exercise in intellectual retardation.
Click to expand...
Not once have I brought up the teabaggers, at all. And it has been Chuckles who tried (and failed) to stretch my points to what you are now engaging in. If you think you can do any better (your batting average with me is 0.000), go ahead.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
There is no denying that they are about "drugs and money", but as throughout this discussion, you want to ignore the poli-sci aspect, which you are free to do, until it comes to debating my point.

Your denial still doesn't change the fact that they are US domestic rw terrorists when they start assassinating Texas govt officials.
Click to expand...
What would you call Russian Mafia who assassinate a judge? IMO, drug criminals are drug criminals. Albeit these guys get their recruiting posters from Confederates and Nazi insignia. They are not pursuing a political outcome. In fact, the people they are killing in Texas are probably on the Right.
 
Any word on the victim's position on gun control?
 
Gimmesometruth said:
You still just can't get it, I did not make it a partisan issue, that happened centuries ago by social conservatives, you apparently just can't accept this this very basic point and still try to pin it on me....now...here in the 21st century.

Again, "libertarians" are so weak on history.
Click to expand...

holy ****.. you really are dense.

as i said, i'm done with the tangent.. you can spin and twist in the wind to your hearts content.


i'm very weak on your sort of history... but i'm fairly good with accurate history.
Sodomy was not a partisan issue.. until relatively recently... sodomy laws were once universally accepted.

is there any more history you would like to rewrite today?... make it quick, i ain't got all day to correct you.
 
calamity said:
What would you call Russian Mafia who assassinate a judge? IMO, drug criminals are drug criminals. Albeit these guys get their recruiting posters from Confederates and Nazi insignia. They are not pursuing a political outcome. In fact, the people they are killing in Texas are probably on the Right.
Click to expand...
I'm not going to get off on some other group(s) when you seem to have trouble just id'ing the Black Panthers. Further, the political bent is not determined by who a group is assassinating....Just because Stalin killed Trotsky-ites did not make him rw. And you keep on believing that I am saying that their assassination are politically motivated, when again, my point has been pretty simple, identifying them as a rw extremist entity.


TO ALL Brothers who have been chosen to stand, lead, follow, and obey, as one in sincere unity with all the laws and ways of the supreme Aryan Brotherhood of the state of Mississippi the following is our law, code, and orders:
(1-A) An ARYAN BROTHER is one who shows, gives, and demands his respect where it is due and upholds every moral principle and value of and for all the Elite White Aryan Race...
(2-B) Once a chosen prospect has become a full Brother to the brand he will hold that title until his very death. Whether his death be of honor and loyalty to the Brotherhood, or of Dishonor and without loyalty. It is of his own choosing. For that very dishonor and un-loyalty may be the very cause of his death...

(7-A) The Aryan Brotherhood constitution will be read by all prospects at the time of becoming a Brother. Under no circumstances shall the A.B.'s constitution be ignored, neglected, disrespected or used in slander by anyone for any insult is certain of IMMEDIATE DEATH!!!

From a list of AB 'characteristics'
a) Awareness of your surroundings and environment at all times
b) Belief in and of the racial purity of the white race
c) Mental stability
d) Efficiency in acquiring further knowledge
e) Family oriented for your race
f) Genetically of European ancestry
g) Honest in any and all Aryan Business
h) Valuable to the Brotherhood
i) Willingness to be supportive of the Brotherhood outside prison
j) Pact-Bound
k) Strong Willed
l) Obedient of all known Aryan Laws
m) Noble and superior in Nature
n) Keeper of information
Click to expand...
Being a Brother | Southern Poverty Law Center
 
Thrilla said:
holy ****.. you really are dense.

as i said, i'm done with the tangent.. you can spin and twist in the wind to your hearts content.


i'm very weak on your sort of history... but i'm fairly good with accurate history.
Sodomy was not a partisan issue.. until relatively recently... sodomy laws were once universally accepted.

is there any more history you would like to rewrite today?... make it quick, i ain't got all day to correct you.
Click to expand...
Right, again, in your view, laws against sexual acts had no poli-sci aspects.....until "recently".

I'm not here to teach you (the remedial work would be overwhelming), I'm just showing all your errors. It is not my problem if you fail to see them.
 
Thrilla said:
soooo.. which part of that platform is "right wing"?
Click to expand...
Dude, I have given up on teaching you anything.

When a person comes into a debate on what is or is not extremist rw ideology, who doesn't understand concepts on rw authoritarianism, what difference would it make when examples of this are presented....?

None.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Right, again, in your view, laws against sexual acts had no poli-sci aspects.....until "recently".

I'm not here to teach you (the remedial work would be overwhelming), I'm just showing all your errors. It is not my problem if you fail to see them.
Click to expand...

one must first learn before they can teach..... so sit down and learn kid....baby steps.

it's not "my view"...I didn't create the view.... sodomy was not a partisan issue until relatively recently.... those laws were once universally accepted as proper... that's not a "view", that's what we call " history"...

do you understand what "universally" means?..it means there was no opposition... for centuries...all over the world.

the first "opposition" was comprised of adjusting the penalty for breaking that law... they attempted to change the maximum penalty from death to castration.
the effort failed... that was in the late 1700's...... nothing more was attempted until 1962.....gradually, we all figured it out .
it took from 1075 BC to 1962 AD, but humans act slow sometimes.

there, i've provide an argument that can be corroborated though independent sources..... now, i'd like you to provide an argument as to how you believe everybody in the ****ing world was a "social conservative" throughout the damn near 3000 year history of sodomy laws... provide an argument as to how sodomy laws were a partisan issue at their inception.
make sure we can corroborate ( IOW, don't make **** up)
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Are you talking about the Black Panthers? Of course they were an extremist lw group.

And the political/sociological structure of the "mafia" can be described.
Click to expand...


the black guerrilla family is a prison gang with political and racial aspects to it. But like the AB it's basically a bunch of thugs in prison who use such things as a recruiting tool
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Your denial still doesn't change the fact that they are US domestic rw terrorists when they start assassinating Texas govt officials.
Click to expand...


the article identifies the motivation as a means to stopping a criminal investigation. There seems to be zero political motivation here
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Dude, I have given up on teaching you anything.

When a person comes into a debate on what is or is not extremist rw ideology, who doesn't understand concepts on rw authoritarianism, what difference would it make when examples of this are presented....?

None.
Click to expand...

you're the one trying to define a gang hit as a politically motivated act
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Dude, I have given up on teaching you anything.

When a person comes into a debate on what is or is not extremist rw ideology, who doesn't understand concepts on rw authoritarianism, what difference would it make when examples of this are presented....?

None.
Click to expand...

dude, i've been around political forums for over a decade... I know every play you are going to attempt.

this is the " I have no ****ing answer that fits my agenda, so i'll just say the other guy is too stupid to understand and not give one " play

now go sit on the bench and watch ... someone smart might succeed where you have failed.









ah **** it... you could have made an argument about cultural conservatism as it relates to ethno-nationalism ... hell you could have used their drug trade as de facto support of laissez-faire capitalism, you might have even went to the old "family values" cupboard.


nah.. you chose an ignorant and defunct play from an outdated playbook.... fail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom