• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Michele Bachmann Faces Congressional Ethics Probe.....

MMC

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
56,981
Reaction score
27,029
Location
Chicago Illinois
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Private
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) is under investigation by the Office of Congressional Ethics for alleged misuse of campaign funds, her attorney confirmed Monday.

TLS_1708_1318382280.jpg


The probe was first reported by the Daily Beast. An OCE investigation is a preliminary probe; the office can either dismiss a case or recommend a full House Ethics Committee investigation. The OCE is a non-partisan, independent entity governed by an eight-person board made up of private citizens chosen by the House Speaker and minority leader. There is a 30-day preliminary review; if members decide there is reasonable cause to believe the allegations, a 45-day further review follows. Four members can vote to refer a matter to the Ethics Committee, and four members can vote to terminate a probe. The office does not have subpoena power.

Peter Waldron, who served as Bachmann’s national field coordinator in the 2012 presidential race, has filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission alleging that the lawmaker’s campaign improperly used leadership PAC funds to pay presidential campaign staff. Consultant Guy Short, he alleges, was paid with MichelePAC funds. He also charges that payments to Bachmann’s Iowa campaign chairman, state Sen. Kent Sorenson, were concealed due to ethics rules that bar legislators from being employed by campaigns. Both Bachmann and Sorenson have denied those allegations

In January Waldron accused Bachmann’s team of not paying Iowa staffers and of attempting to force them to sign non-disclosure agreements that would prohibit them from discussing any immoral, unethical or criminal behavior with the media, the police or an attorney. Woolson says that all staffers were paid in full.....snip~

Michele Bachmann faces congressional ethics probe


Looks like they may have Bachmann and may take it the full route thru the Ethics Committee. Wonder what this Waldron guy has against her as this isn't the first time he has brought stuff out on her. Thoughts?
 
Good. I'm Republican and think she's crazy.
 
Good. I'm Republican and think she's crazy.

Yeah, I am too.....and I would have to agree with you. Although she was been Right on a couple of issues. It doesn't make up for most of what comes out of her mouth. Nor would I use her as one of the Republican Women we have to be any type of spokesperson for the party.
 
So she'll end up like Charlie Rangel?
 
So because people disagree with her or don't like her, that means she did something wrong? Right, am I reading the previous posters correctly? She's crazy so obviously it follows that she's a crook, right? :roll:
 
So because people disagree with her or don't like her, that means she did something wrong? Right, am I reading the previous posters correctly? She's crazy so obviously it follows that she's a crook, right? :roll:

Maxine Waters is crazy and she and her husband are believed to be crooks, so it's possibly a congressional trend. Although the good folks on the Congressional Ethics Committee (hard to write that without laughing) ruled that Maxine did no wrong.

What's wrong in normal, everyday America is not necessarily wrong in Congress.
 
So because people disagree with her or don't like her, that means she did something wrong? Right, am I reading the previous posters correctly? She's crazy so obviously it follows that she's a crook, right? :roll:

No, they are saying she may have ethics violations if she misused election funds the way it looks like she did. She is crazy all on her own and no one is investigating her all too important delusions and hallucinations. She is perfectly capable of being crazy since it bothers you, it is just that the other congresspeople don't want her stealing more money than they do.
 
Isnt this committee essentially a grand jury to an actual investigation? Not sure, honestly asking.
 
So because people disagree with her or don't like her, that means she did something wrong? Right, am I reading the previous posters correctly? She's crazy so obviously it follows that she's a crook, right? :roll:

Well, there is more than just Waldron.

Bachmann’s presidential campaign came under fire in 2011 for sending two e-mails to a Network of Iowa Christian Home Educators (NICHE) list, in violation of the group’s non-profit status. Woolson testified in a sworn affidavit that Sorenson took the e-mail list and that Bachmann acknowledged that she was aware of the alleged theft. Bachmann’s campaign said at the time that the use was inadvertent, a characterization Woolson’s testimony appears to contradict. Barb Heki, who worked on Bachmann’s campaign, is suing the congresswoman and former senior aides over the misappropriation of the list, alleging that staffers stole it off her computer and then blamed her when the misuse went public. She has also filed a criminal complaint, which Urbandale police are investigating......snip~

Bachmann herself admitted that such was an error. Do you think the Demos wont push to have investigated?
 
So because people disagree with her or don't like her, that means she did something wrong? Right, am I reading the previous posters correctly? She's crazy so obviously it follows that she's a crook, right? :roll:

Might want to try to read the article.
 
Found this:

Panel Doesn’t Act On Complaint Tied To Bachmann « CBS Minnesota

[h=1]Panel Doesn’t Act On Complaint Tied To Bachmann[/h][h=6]February 13, 2013 2:17 PM[/h]

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A state Senate ethics committee has opted not to act on a complaint filed against a Republican senator that accused him of taking improper payments from Rep. Michele Bachmann’s presidential campaign.
During a Wednesday meeting, committee members voted to take no further action unless they get additional information on the complaint filed.

Jan 28 by former Bachmann aide Peter Waldron against Sen. Kent Sorenson. Waldron says Bachmann for President tried to conceal payments to Sorenson by running the money through a political action committee with ties to the Minnesota congresswoman.

The Senate has an ethics ban on paid employment with political campaigns. Sorenson has called the claims “baseless.”
Davenport Democratic Sen. Joe Seng voted against the move, saying he’d prefer to ask the Iowa Supreme Court to appoint an investigator.

Looks like Waldron has been pursuing this for a while now. Got no idea about who is right or wrong on the face of it.
 
she will receive the charlie rangel maxine walters treatment
 
Maxine Waters is crazy and she and her husband are believed to be crooks, so it's possibly a congressional trend. Although the good folks on the Congressional Ethics Committee (hard to write that without laughing) ruled that Maxine did no wrong.

What's wrong in normal, everyday America is not necessarily wrong in Congress.

But..But..what's wrong in Congress affects everyday people...negatively! What can we do besides vent? :argue: And they want to restrict our right to do that....
 
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) is under investigation by the Office of Congressional Ethics for alleged misuse of campaign funds, her attorney confirmed Monday.

TLS_1708_1318382280.jpg


The probe was first reported by the Daily Beast. An OCE investigation is a preliminary probe; the office can either dismiss a case or recommend a full House Ethics Committee investigation. The OCE is a non-partisan, independent entity governed by an eight-person board made up of private citizens chosen by the House Speaker and minority leader. There is a 30-day preliminary review; if members decide there is reasonable cause to believe the allegations, a 45-day further review follows. Four members can vote to refer a matter to the Ethics Committee, and four members can vote to terminate a probe. The office does not have subpoena power.

Peter Waldron, who served as Bachmann’s national field coordinator in the 2012 presidential race, has filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission alleging that the lawmaker’s campaign improperly used leadership PAC funds to pay presidential campaign staff. Consultant Guy Short, he alleges, was paid with MichelePAC funds. He also charges that payments to Bachmann’s Iowa campaign chairman, state Sen. Kent Sorenson, were concealed due to ethics rules that bar legislators from being employed by campaigns. Both Bachmann and Sorenson have denied those allegations

In January Waldron accused Bachmann’s team of not paying Iowa staffers and of attempting to force them to sign non-disclosure agreements that would prohibit them from discussing any immoral, unethical or criminal behavior with the media, the police or an attorney. Woolson says that all staffers were paid in full.....snip~

Michele Bachmann faces congressional ethics probe


Looks like they may have Bachmann and may take it the full route thru the Ethics Committee. Wonder what this Waldron guy has against her as this isn't the first time he has brought stuff out on her. Thoughts?

It's only a probe. Doesn't make it a witch-hunt.
 
It's only a probe. Doesn't make it a witch-hunt.

No, it doesn't make it a watch hunt. But when have you known Democrats to let something like this go and with who it is upon. This is the Tea Party Rep Unofficial Caucus Queen. Who is always out attacking Democrats. Although they may not be able to push it in the House.
 
No, it doesn't make it a watch hunt. But when have you known Democrats to let something like this go and with who it is upon. This is the Tea Party Rep Unofficial Caucus Queen. Who is always out attacking Democrats. Although they may not be able to push it in the House.

Yeah. And this is an 8 person board - of 4 Democrats and 4 Republicans - who have 30 days to investigate without subpoena power before they recommend a greater investigation to the Ethics Committee.

No big deal either way, as allegations are easy to make but still need looking into to see if they are substantive or not.

So this is a non-story. It'll be a story once a greater investigation happens - if one ever does.
 
So because people disagree with her or don't like her, that means she did something wrong? Right, am I reading the previous posters correctly? She's crazy so obviously it follows that she's a crook, right? :roll:

Well no, she's a Republican so we should ignore and deny even the slightest possibility that she did anything wrong.
 
Well no, she's a Republican so we should ignore and deny even the slightest possibility that she did anything wrong.

Right - Jesse Jackson.
 
There's been noise that she was considering running for Senate against Al Franken.

Her biggest problem is that she represents a district that is specifically drawn up for a guaranteed Republican win, and she barely won re-election. Nobody's sure that she could pull off a statewide win.
 
She can't be held criminally responsible due to mental disability...
 
Well consider this..

1.) Bachman is crazy.. her views are beyond nuts often and she is a disgrace to women at large.
2.) She is a welfare queen..

Anti-socialist Bachmann got $250K in federal farm subsidies - On Congress - POLITICO.com

and

Welfare Queen Michele Bachmann Exposed By Tax Returns - YouTube!

So we have a bat crazy woman, known liar... and a hypocrite. Is it really beyond reason that she is also a crook and is abusing the election system for personal profit?


Very good points. Why don't republicans think welfare for the wealthy is a problem?
 
Back
Top Bottom