• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Palin Calls Obama a Liar in Speech to Conservative Activists......

Do yuo hate Sarah Palin for any particular reason? Or are you simply another Democrat anti-female "activist", or what?

Please explain the reason for your vile hate-mongering to the DP forum.

I don't hate her. I have contempt for her as an ignoramous and a quitter, who reneged on her committment to the people of Alaska. She a stupid dullard who makes a fool of herself every time she opens her mouth. Why is it you on the Right love those ignorant women? Do the smart ones scare you too much?
 
And we see what the Democrat Party have become, the party of hate.

Below the surface, the political left fear Sarah Palin and it shows.

Unlike you folks on the Far Right - who have nothing but respect and love for your political opponents.:lamo
 
Unlike you folks on the Far Right - who have nothing but respect and love for your political opponents.:lamo

The far right ?

Who exactly would the "far right" be ?

I'm unaware of any Torrie's living in America or anyone who is advocating establishing a monarchy or an aristocratic society in America.

But the fringe of the left who control the Democrat Party today would consider someone who is "slightly liberal" to be far right.
 
Clearly you've fallen on hard times - my condolences - as for Hillary, I'm sure Billy Boy would drive her to your place if you're serious.

I like independent older chicks and I'm (an old) 42, that means 50s, and some 60s, might be ok. I want a woman that knows something and thus can appreciate me. I don't need an easy judge.
 
Palin aint human..



The fact that you think that Obama is worse than Bush,.. well. And as for Dear Sarah.. she could not even stay a full term in Alaska without being run out of town because of looming corruption and political scandals and she left that ****-hole of a town she use to run in a mountain of debt.

I'm sure Sarah Palin couldn't care less what some random guy from Mijas Costa del Sol, which I'm guessing is Spain, thinks about her. You're not American.

Just to put it in to perspective, I doubt 5% of the people on this board can even name who the prime minister of Spain is. Nobody cares. So why you take your hatred of Sarah Palin to such an extent that you call her "not human" is kind of pathetic.

Maybe you take these things a little too seriously?
 
Gotta love liberal respect for women.

Peter Grimm, you probably don't know him, seeing as how you've been here all of 2 months, but he's far from a Liberal.
 
The NSA, FBI, CIA, ICE and every other major national security organization didn't check up on Obama's background? I would love for somebody to answer that question.
 
The NSA, FBI, CIA, ICE and every other major national security organization didn't check up on Obama's background? I would love for somebody to answer that question.

What a bizarre endorsement basis. In my opinion, they not only checked up on him, they totally control him. It has always been clear to me that Obama is a shill. He generally does exactly opposite what he says and to date has not done anything those organizations wnat - and pointedly so.
 
Sarcasm aside, I'd bang the hell outta Sarah. That ain't no insult. So as not to appear partisan, if Hillary dropped a couple pounds I'd throw her a party too.

Your age is showing.
 
She does not have opinions, that is the problem. She lacks the intellectual compentency to even run her own household.

What does that mean?
 
The bizarrre level intense rage and total hatred by the Democrats is proof of her effectiveness. A person is more known by their enemies than friends.

She doesn't give a damn what liberals and Democrats think, but she sure has taken control of them. Very impressive!
 
What a bizarre endorsement basis. In my opinion, they not only checked up on him, they totally control him. It has always been clear to me that Obama is a shill. He generally does exactly opposite what he says and to date has not done anything those organizations wnat - and pointedly so.

So, they didn't check up on him before he became president? No background checks? None?
 
The NSA, FBI, CIA, ICE and every other major national security organization didn't check up on Obama's background? I would love for somebody to answer that question.
I seriously doubt that a lame duck president facing huge national security challenges would make that a high priority. What's for breakfast was probably higher on the priority list than Obama.
 
Last edited:
I seriously doubt that a lame duck president facing huge national security challenges would make that a high priority. What's for breakfast was probably higher on the priority list than Obama.

Obama wasn't always president, so I'll make my question clearer:

When Obama was running for president, not 1 of the NS organizations in the US decided to check his background? If they did, why is it they found nothing that raised any red flags?
 
Obama wasn't always president, so I'll make my question clearer:

When Obama was running for president, not 1 of the NS organizations in the US decided to check his background? If they did, why is it they found nothing that raised any red flags?
The premise of your question is extremely presumptuous.
 
The premise of your question is extremely presumptuous.

Great claims require great evidence. If the claim is that Obama did not go through a background check before running for President, one has to wonder why? If he did, then why is it they (the various NS organizations in the country) didn't find anything which raised red flags for national security? What? Are we just handing the codes to the sylos over to whomever runs for president?

As it stands we can only "presume" to know one thing: Obama went through necessary background checks performed on presidential hopefuls since the 50s-60s. They found nothing and moved on.
 
Great claims require great evidence. If the claim is that Obama did not go through a background check before running for President, one has to wonder why? If he did, then why is it they (the various NS organizations in the country) didn't find anything which raised red flags for national security? What? Are we just handing the codes to the sylos over to whomever runs for president?

As it stands we can only "presume" to know one thing: Obama went through necessary background checks performed on presidential hopefuls since the 50s-60s. They found nothing and moved on.
What article of the US Constitution requires that a presidential candidate must be subject to a "background check"?

I don't recall that term ever being used in the US constitution. Do you?

In light of our current constitutional crisis I think it is time for an amendment to the US constitution.
 
What article of the US Constitution requires that a presidential candidate must be subject to a "background check"?

Good lord, a red herring if I've ever seen one. Since when does the constitution have anything to do with background checks of any kind? They're done every single day with little regard for the constitution. Try buying a gun and see.
 
Good lord, a red herring if I've ever seen one. Since when does the constitution have anything to do with background checks of any kind? They're done every single day with little regard for the constitution. Try buying a gun and see.
Try getting on the ballot and see.
 
Try getting on the ballot and see.

Well, I accept that you have nothing to contribute to this thread other than nonsensical red herrings.
 
ahh ok.. so it's just the usual liberal knee jerk hatred at work here... gotcha.

FWIW, i'm not a fan of Palin's politics... I just don't have this weird hate fetish that y'all do.

No please do go on and tell us all about how great sarah is and keep putting more and more people off of your POV. Don't let me stop you from idolizing one of the biggest village idiots in the world.
 
Great claims require great evidence. If the claim is that Obama did not go through a background check before running for President, one has to wonder why? If he did, then why is it they (the various NS organizations in the country) didn't find anything which raised red flags for national security? What? Are we just handing the codes to the sylos over to whomever runs for president?

As it stands we can only "presume" to know one thing: Obama went through necessary background checks performed on presidential hopefuls since the 50s-60s. They found nothing and moved on.

The point you are trying to make is really stupid.
 
No please do go on and tell us all about how great sarah is and keep putting more and more people off of your POV. Don't let me stop you from idolizing one of the biggest village idiots in the world.

Palin really does have great control over you! :lamo
 
It must be a wonderful fantasy land you live in if you believe Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter aren't totally wrapped up in what serves their own self interest - there isn't a single politician ever to breathe that didn't have their own self-interest as a basis for all they do. Why do you think Presidents are so concerned about their "legacy"?

How are the Bush's concerned with their legacies? W couldn't BUY his way to anyone who wanted his library. And Carter helping Habitat for Humanity hardly advanced his economic interests anymore than his now devoting himself to talking about peace and Mrs. Carter lobbying for the mentally ill in prisons being removed and put into mental health facilities.

As to Clinton, working on Haiti and other endeavors takes away time from collecting money in speaking engagement.

Such a negative view of two men who have served countless hours to help this nation certainly demonstrates your automatic conclusions to "politicians". Sad. YOu need to separate the men from the boys. It's not hard to do.
 
Back
Top Bottom