• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NY judge halts Bloomberg ban on large sugary drinks

Now, may I say something totally politically incorrect? (Moderators, shoot me down as soon as you have to).

Here you have Mike Bloomberg, a good Jewish boy. Bright, diligent, driven - I wouldn't mind at all being reincarnated the next time around as a Jew - my current oversized blond Slavic-Germanic version is okay, but kinda sluggish, short on ambition, if you know what I mean...

Now, imagine you are a good Jewish boy/girl (or Italian, for that matter) - and what your Mother says is the law. (Quick-n'-corny cultural reference: Steve Martin in the "Little Shop of Horrors" -" I am a dentist -and a success!")

What do you think Mother was telling little Mickey? "Work hard". "Be inventive". " Never give up" (There you have the "Republican" side). And: 'Don't you EVER touch the stuff that's BAD for you: guns, porn, OVERSIZED SODA!!!"

There you go.
 
Just curious: How many people here ever drink 32oz's of soda at one sitting?

I have drank 64 oz's of soda at a sitting. I must admit I am adicted to Coca Cola. So much so that I only can use certain foutains and only drink the stuff with surger. I can get really thirsty.:) I dont normally. Normally I get 44 oz coca cola filed mostly with ice and that lasts me the day. I think there might be 12 ounces of soda in there at most. I drink the soda mostly and then let the ice melt off a bit and drink that and refresh it a bit with some bottled water toward the end of the day. Its that or iced coffee. Either works well.
 
Yeah but a lot of us do not want to suffer the consequences of some jackasses "freedom" that effects our own freedom so we understand that is why free men and women create a government.

Free men don't stay free if they don't allow their fellow man to practice their freedom.
 
Free men don't stay free if they don't allow their fellow man to practice their freedom.

So if I live in your neighborhood I can blow a supersonic loud blow horn 24 hrs a day.
 
So if I live in your neighborhood I can blow a supersonic loud blow horn 24 hrs a day.

Is there a name for this debate tactic of coming up with random examples?

That is not a government issue.
 
OK gotta go, going to coke machine and get an orange fanta. Peace.
 
Have you not understood any of my points? Yes I know you likely want to disband the irs, the epa, child labor laws, go to gold standard or even eliminate nay currency. I realize you think government is evil and any laws that governm behavior is big government. Maybe in the future you'll get your wish of the individualistic super weak government. You can then see what your idea of "freedom" results in.

Actually I have seen that. Up close and personal. I prefer that state of affairs. Problems can be delt with and resolved quickly decisvely and permantately. I will freely admit there are downsides. Lots in fact. Government that is limited in scope would be preferable. But given a choice I prefer no government. Thats because I CAN take care of myself and mine. This government could go to hell and I would be just fine.
 
Do gooders like my 0% corporate tax rate, 0% capital gains on ipo, destroying the teachers union with a plan to make elite education and job training to the masses at pennies to the dollar of current policies. Yes let's do away with someone trying to come up with smarter public policy. Lets be ideocracy! I think we should give our marines and armd forces more "freedom". Look at all the do gooders with all the fitness and discipline requirements that restrict their freedom!

On the bright side, this is probably the first time I've ever seen someone on this board that's a self-described fascist.
 
On the bright side, this is probably the first time I've ever seen someone on this board that's a self-described fascist.

If you think I'm a fascist just show's how intelligent your discerning skills are.
 
If you think I'm a fascist just show's how intelligent your discerning skills are.

First of all, remove the apostrophe.

Second - your state-first mentality is textbook fascism. I figure that you'll soon want to be a little more statist with your corporatism, and then you'll be full Benito.
 
First of all, remove the apostrophe.

- your state-first mentality is textbook fascism. I figure that you'll soon want to be a little more statist with your corporatism, and then you'll be full Benito.

The apostrophe was a mistype spelling nazi. Second you do not know me or my positions well enough to make your absurd comment that I'm a fascist. Let's see my state first mentality, I support an amendment that protects economic freedom by limiting the rates of income tax, support of balance budget amendment, support of term limits of one term in executive and legislative branch, distrust of anyone seeking power. How does me wanting 0% corporate rate, o% capital gains tax on ipo, elimination of double taxation like estate and property tax fit your fascist conclusion. I support the 2nd amendment as well as the rest of them, strong supporter of constitution. Do I think freedom of speech means you can yell fire in theater, no. but that doesn't make me a fascist. That I think single payer health insurance is smart doesn't make m a fascist. Support of epa, etc. Only in the minds of libertarians.
 
Yes I didn't realize there was no need for an apostrophe. Thank you so much for being anal enough to point it out.
 
Just curious: How many people here ever drink 32oz's of soda at one sitting?

That depends on how hot it is outside and why did you pick 32oz if anything over 16 was banned?
 
Yes I didn't realize there was no need for an apostrophe. Thank you so much for being anal enough to point it out.

I didn't say anything about an apostrophe. If you're going to make fun of somebody's intelligence, at least use proper grammar.
 
You may be right about the black market. Will some people buy their beer illegally and chance say a 1 yr prison sentence if they think they can get around paying 5% income tax and 20% lower prices, some likely will. But the policies will still raise gov. revenue and lower overall demand than current policies because the majority will go legal and not risk prison time. Also my prison policy, which I won't go into detail on, would make prisons basically free to taxpayers. Basically replaces a lot of the civilian road workers, create disaster relief cleanup crews, etc.

I like that prison policy. Down here in Georgia we still have county prisoners go out and police the highways and roads. But every so often, the ACLU or some other group will try to get the county to stop it. I guess they think it is beneath the prisoners dignity to do police call. some revenue is always better than none
 
I didn't say anything about an apostrophe. If you're going to make fun of somebody's intelligence, at least use proper grammar.

Maybe I wasn't talking about you. Where did I mention your name, and did not Gipper mention apostrophe? Only one trying to insult someone's intelligence is you in your glib posts and him for bringing it up. Maybe next time I am typing fast and by accident type "than" instead of "then" you can be my grammar police. Sort of like another level of auto correct. Maybe you are too small of soul to correct me in private but if you want to shout it out in public and make me look stupid and get your kicks for being so blandly clever, go for it. I appreciate the free service.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I wasn't talking about you. Where did I mention your name, and did not Gipper mention apostrophe? Only one trying to insult someone's intelligence is you in your glib posts and him for bringing it up. Maybe next time I am typing fast and by accident type "than" instead of "then" you can be my grammar police. Sort of like another level of auto correct. Maybe you are too small of soul to correct me in private but if you want to shout it out in public and make me look stupid and get your kicks for being so blandly clever, go for it. I appreciate the free service.

Get mad all you want. You're the one using terrible grammar while improperly using simple words in a shallow attempt to appear more fancy. You are right about one thing, though. The more of the story isn't to get more uppity. The moral is don't talk **** unless you can take the heat. Obviously, you can't.
 
Lol you think I'm mad. You don't have enough game. I've given in depth analysis of my positions. You are the one being grammar nazi. I have no clue what you are talking about trying to look fancy. Respond intelligently to my positions or stfu. If I leave this thread it will be because of boredom.
 
Get mad all you want. You're the one using terrible grammar while improperly using simple words in a shallow attempt to appear more fancy. You are right about one thing, though. The more of the story isn't to get more uppity. The moral is don't talk **** unless you can take the heat. Obviously, you can't.

Ooh got a grammar mistake. I think you mean "moral" of story. Also what am I right about? Weird grammar, where do I make this moral point. You are a hypocrite, a grammar nazi with not so good grammar himself. I admit I'm no grammar master, I just post on a political forum. I feel lame even acting like you in highlighting your tactics. It's about ideas not rhetorical games and image with me. Again debate my positions and stop with the attacks or STFU.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom