• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AP PHOTOS: Mob in Pakistan torches Christian homes

my argument as factually never changed LOL
I posted this point pages ago and it hasnt altered at all LMAO, let me know when you have anything factual to take away form that point because all your doing is posting spin, after spin, after spin.
ill keep waiting, this thread isnt going anywhere. wonder what you will try to make up next because my quotes support me as they are written, not what you make up they mean LMAO

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...orches-christian-homes-29.html#post1061554115

except when it did above ...
 

only in your head, not in realty, not based on facts and not based on my quotes or words

"my argument as factually never changed LOL
I posted this point pages ago and it hasnt altered at all LMAO, let me know when you have anything factual to take away form that point because all your doing is posting spin, after spin, after spin.
ill keep waiting, this thread isnt going anywhere. wonder what you will try to make up next because my quotes support me as they are written, not what you make up they mean LMAO"
 
You're right that whatever point you had was posted pages ago but since then your posts have just taken up space. Why not return to the topic of the thread if you are still interested?

It's what he does in every thread. The constant appeals to logic just add a bit of humor to the whole situation
 
Amazing the the American people have been duped into believing monopoly is a good thing, a prince rigging cartel is in the best interest of our economy, the solution is war until all the bad guys have been killed, oil is the best thing possible for transportation and America lacks the ingenuity to justify getting behind anything other than oil.

Drive Electric: Cell Phone - YouTube

We wouldn't have to be involved with these people if we realized there's a better way than oil.
 
Last edited:
i have been just about every couple posts :shrug:

the thread OP fails because it illogically uses the actions of some to judge the group.

thats the point

'The group' is those Muslims who are burning down the homes of Christians. We know that 'not all Muslims are terrorists'. We all understand that by now. If they were all terrorists they'd be much easier to locate.

What concerns many are those who are terrorists, such as those murdering Christians right now and /or burning down their homes. Is it possible to address that issue without all the usual cliches?
 
1.)'The group' is those Muslims who are burning down the homes of Christians. We know that 'not all Muslims are terrorists'. We all understand that by now. If they were all terrorists they'd be much easier to locate.

2.)What concerns many are those who are terrorists, such as those murdering Christians right now and /or burning down their homes. Is it possible to address that issue without all the usual cliches?

1.) obviously the OP does not know this
2.) yes it would be possible in an honest thread that didn't have a failed, dishonest, illogical, cliched and bigoted OP :shrug:

if the OP was looking for honest non "cliched" response then the OP should have start an honest non cliched thread.
 
1.) obviously the OP does not know this
2.) yes it would be possible in an honest thread that didn't have a failed, dishonest, illogical, cliched and bigoted OP :shrug:

if the OP was looking for honest non "cliched" response then the OP should have start an honest non cliched thread.

How would you have worded it?
 
How would you have worded it?

easy

I would of left out the nonsensical and dishonest parts grouping islam/muslims as a whole :shrug:
 
How would you have worded it?

He wouldn't have.....because apparently he does not have the intellectual capacity to understand that my reference to "Islam" as the "Religion of Peace" in the OP was simply sarcasm. :shrug:
 
8
easy

I would of left out the nonsensical and dishonest parts grouping islam/muslims as a whole :shrug:

1) his comment concerned Islam " being the religion of peace". Unless you are claiming Islam *is* the religion of peace, I am unsure what you are taking issue with

2) as stated previous, and which you failed to address. Even if Islam was an inherently violent religion, such does not amount to every Muslim being violent. The religion is still interpreted
 
8

1) his comment concerned Islam " being the religion of peace". Unless you are claiming Islam *is* the religion of peace, I am unsure what you are taking issue with

2) as stated previous, and which you failed to address. Even if Islam was an inherently violent religion, such does not amount to every Muslim being violent. The religion is still interpreted

thank you for your opinion of the recap, however your opinion of it and what was actually said is meaningless to me :

he factually grouped them together whether you agree or not :shrug:
 
thank you for your opinion of the recap, however your opinion of it and what was actually said is meaningless to me :

he factually grouped them together whether you agree or not :shrug:

What a well thought out argument: you're wrong because I said so!

So how did he group them together, exactly?
 
thank you for your opinion of the recap, however your opinion of it and what was actually said is meaningless to me :

he factually grouped them together whether you agree or not :shrug:

My OP is not difficult to find.....just scroll to the top of the page and click the "First" icon in the thread results section. All I said, and sarcastically mind you, was "Ah, Islam....ever the religion of peace." How this is specifically targeting ALL individual Muslims is quite beyond me. I even went as far, in a few posts later, as to address a Muslim poster specifically to point out that in no-way did I honestly believe that EVERY Muslim supported or participated in acts of violence against other religions.

If you DO believe that Islam, as both a religious and political institution has proven to be a "Religion of Peace".....then, by all means, provide evidence to the contrary.

Your failure to understand simple sarcasm and to twist facts is truly a thing to behold. Since you've been caught endorsing another poster's fraudelent statistics regarding the probable number of "violent" Muslims........you done nothing more than blatantly deny facts and have even consistently denied what you've actually said in this thread even after it's been pointed out to you repeatedly in over 10 pages........several times by quoting you directly.

Blatant denial with absolutely zero evidence to support your claim, is not really a good way to "win" people over to your position. This method tends to work only among circles of 4th-graders on school playgrounds........and even then, only when dealing with especially "dense" 4th-graders. :shrug:
 
Last edited:
My OP is not difficult to find.....just scroll to the top of the page and click the "First" icon in the thread results section. All I said, and sarcastically mind you, was "Ah, Islam....ever the religion of peace." How this is specifically targeting ALL individual Muslims is quite beyond me. I even went as far, in a few posts later, as to address a Muslim poster specifically to point out that in no-way did I honestly believe that EVERY Muslim supported or participated in acts of violence against other religions.

If you do not believe that Islam, as both a religious and political institution has proven to be a "Religion of Peace".....then, by all means, provide evidence to the contrary.

Your failure to understand simple sarcasm and to twist facts is truly a thing to behold. Since you've been caught endorsing another poster's fraudelent statistics regarding the probable number of "violent" Muslims........you done nothing more than blatantly deny facts and have even consistently denied what you've actually said in this thread even after it's been pointed out to you repeatedly in over 10 pages........several times by quoting you directly.

Blatant denial with absolutely zero evidence to support your claim, is not really a good way to "win" people over to your position. This method tends to work only among circles of 4th-graders on school playgrounds........and even then, only when dealing with especially "dense" 4th-graders. :shrug:

LMAO, derp, logic, I win~!!!
 
Please explain how I am wrong then. I will even post the quote you referenced and your comments on it, again





If you disagreed with the "one million" number, then why did you clearly endorse it as you do above?




Yet, we are presented with the glaring fact that you can't explain how it doesn't support me, beyond going "nu-uh" ...




besides when it did change, as is documented here:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...orches-christian-homes-29.html#post1061554115

You've wined and cried for pages now, and it's getting to the point of being ridiculous. You can't classify those who symphathize with islamistic organizations as violent themselves. The criteria was 1 million VIOLENT, radical muslims. If there were actually 1 million VIOLENT muslims, we would have far, far more problems than we have today.

If you'd like to provide evidence that 1 million muslims are actively violent in their own actions, then go ahead. If not, stop making up bull**** and quoting the same thing over and over again.
 
What a well thought out argument: you're wrong because I said so!

So how did he group them together, exactly?

thats what you dont get, its not an "argument" LMAO

it has nothing to do with "me", this is why you keep failing, YOU are arguing, im only pointing out what factually happened :)
 
My OP is not difficult to find.....just scroll to the top of the page and click the "First" icon in the thread results section. All I said, and sarcastically mind you, was "Ah, Islam....ever the religion of peace." How this is specifically targeting ALL individual Muslims is quite beyond me. I even went as far, in a few posts later, as to address a Muslim poster specifically to point out that in no-way did I honestly believe that EVERY Muslim supported or participated in acts of violence against other religions.

If you DO believe that Islam, as both a religious and political institution has proven to be a "Religion of Peace".....then, by all means, provide evidence to the contrary.

Your failure to understand simple sarcasm and to twist facts is truly a thing to behold. Since you've been caught endorsing another poster's fraudelent statistics regarding the probable number of "violent" Muslims........you done nothing more than blatantly deny facts and have even consistently denied what you've actually said in this thread even after it's been pointed out to you repeatedly in over 10 pages........several times by quoting you directly.

Blatant denial with absolutely zero evidence to support your claim, is not really a good way to "win" people over to your position. This method tends to work only among circles of 4th-graders on school playgrounds........and even then, only when dealing with especially "dense" 4th-graders. :shrug:

you do understand your OP is still here for all to read right?

unless you can make that go awyay the points made by me and others stand

your OP is a failure because it dishonestly and illogical condemns a group based on the actions of some :shrug:

if this fact bothers you the solution is easy, you simply shouldnt have made the nonsensical OP or you should retract you illogical assumption. Its all up to you

but denying what you posted and trying to back pedal wont help you LMAO.


I have denied no facts, not one, this is a bold face lie :shrug:

if you disagree please point out the fact i denied, i cant wait lmao
 
LMAO, derp, logic, I win~!!!

im sure you think that, but like i told him the OP is still here for all to read and i dont have to make stuff up about it LOL

if he doesnt like his nonseniscal post he shouldnt have posted it :shrug:

I have denied no facts, not one, this is a bold face lie :shrug:

if you disagree please point out the fact i denied, i cant wait lmao
 
you do understand your OP is still here for all to read right?

unless you can make that go awyay the points made by me and others stand
Lol, I'm not ashamed of it, nor do I wish to retract it.....I even explained in detail how to go about finding it. :lol:

your OP is a failure because it dishonestly and illogical condemns a group based on the actions of some :shrug:

This response is a failure because you apparently do not understand sarcasm and the humor in the statement just blew past you.

if this fact bothers you the solution is easy, you simply shouldnt have made the nonsensical OP or you should retract you illogical assumption. Its all up to you
I've already said that I'm not bothered in the least by what I said.....only by your direct misrepresentation of it.

but denying what you posted and trying to back pedal wont help you LMAO.
When have I denied what I posted? :thinking:

I have denied no facts, not one, this is a bold face lie :shrug:

if you disagree please point out the fact i denied, i cant wait lmao
If there were such a thing.....you'd truly be deserving of the "Teflon Poster of the Year" award. :lol:
 
You've wined and cried for pages now, and it's getting to the point of being ridiculous.

I'm not sure how quoting you and obj J, citing academic research, and offering arguments on a debate site amount to "whining and crying"


You can't classify those who symphathize with islamistic organizations as violent themselves. The criteria was 1 million VIOLENT, radical muslims. If there were actually 1 million VIOLENT muslims, we would have far, far more problems than we have today.

It wasn't based with them "sympathizing" with islamist organizations, it was based on the fact that they support executing people over their religion. If that isn't a violent position, I don't know what is
 
thats what you dont get, its not an "argument" LMAO

Yes, I fully understand it isn't an argument. But the fact that you are offering it as a rebuttal on a debate site suggests you actually don't

it has nothing to do with "me", this is why you keep failing, YOU are arguing, im only pointing out what factually happened :)

Ahh, more "nu-uh"
 
I'm not sure how quoting you and obj J, citing academic research, and offering arguments on a debate site amount to "whining and crying"




It wasn't based with them "sympathizing" with islamist organizations, it was based on the fact that they support executing people over their religion. If that isn't a violent position, I don't know what is

Most christians support the bible, which is a book that very openly condones violence. Our government uses violence every day, and most Americans support that. I guess that makes all of us violent too. I'm still waiting for your proof that 1 million muslims are themselves violent. You complained for pages, quoting the same quote of mine, but haven't once actually provided a source showing that they've done anything violent.
 
Back
Top Bottom