- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 41,104
- Reaction score
- 12,202
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
...but I accept your surrender :2wave:
....Pfft....As if. :roll:
...but I accept your surrender :2wave:
Abortion is not murder
That's just a lie the moral fascists repeat because they can't argue the facts
Oh my God....Do you even know what you say?
And this was only about 15 posts earlier....Fail.
Except that one is on this planet for our use as food, and the other IS A HUMAN CHILD!
The answer is no
Abortions do not infringe on the rights of any other person
People don't have the right to do as they please with their body or their property. They cant choose to use their body (or their property) to kill other people
But people have the right to decide which medical procedures they will consent to and which they will not.
this is dumb!..........if you killed someone you would infringe on their right.
stated again, with i dont control my body, my property, meaning me, or material goods, ....then you controls them, who owns me, and my property?
Your argument was based on the defenselessness of life. Chickens, cows, etc are just as alive, and just as defenseless as a fetus
you have answered no, then please explain why a person, DOES NOT OWN THIS OWN PROPERTY?
this is dumb!..........if you killed someone you would infringe on their right.
stated again, with i dont control my body, my property, meaning me, or material goods, ....then you controls them, who owns me, and my property?
That old joke about how W.C.Fields likes children doesn't seem so funny anymore.
who owns me, and my property?
I understand where you are going with this, however, one argument may well be that although you have a right to be secure in your person from unreasonable search, and or seizure, the moment you are talking about a separate life, as in the child growing inside you, that person has the same right to be secure.
You may not knowingly sell your gun to a felon.
You own your property. You just can't do whatever you want with it.
why? not!
i have stated over and over , can i do what i want with my property .......IF i DO NOT violate the rights of another person? ...(adding).....or violate criminal law.
Well someone has to defend the idiots, might as well be you
But with the rapid increases in medical knowledge, if viability is the issue, then the State may have the right, with professional input, to put a time limit on when an abortion might take place.
Because it is against Federal Law.
Because we live in a society that in addition to laws, we also have regulations that govern what you do to, or on your own property. This is a direct result of people electing people whom believe it is their job to continually pass laws, and regs, rather than adhering to their oath to protect, and defend the constitution.
But you forgetting the limit of viability has not changed in the last 12 years even with rapid increases of medical knowledge.
Experts agree that no fetus younger than 21 weeks will ever be viable The lungs are not formed enough to survive outside a womb. As the wiki article posted the youngest surviving baby was 21 weeks and 6 days gestation.
Also even premies that are 24 weeks gestation have a high percentage of major disabilities.
here is where i am going.
as a person, i belong to ME, i don't belong to government( we are supposed to be free men), i have a right to be secure in my person, but i also have a right to be secure in my property...... the 5th amendment.
if a person is secure in their body, meaning government has NO authority to stop one from having an abortion, tell them what to eat or drink, then i am BEING secure in my property...me......then along with my body, THEN IT WOULD ALSO EQUATE that i am secure in material goods which are also my property.
why? not!
i have stated over and over , can i do what i want with my property .......IF i DO NOT violate the rights of another person? ...(adding).....or violate criminal law.
(play on words here) so federal law, supersedes the 5th amendment, which means i am not secure in my property, because government can pass a federal law, which controls all i own-----> including my body?
so government is the great decider of rights, instead of its job of securing rights.
Indeed, making the court's promise to revisit the viability issue as the science got better a blatant lie.