• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Racial slurs' aimed at wife draw McConnell's ire

Bull****, it was solely about being a US citizen per Constitutional requirements.

So where was Bush's birth certificate? I googled it and came up with nothing. If it were just that, wouldn't it have been an issue in 2000?
 
There were no questions. That's the point . Black guy with a foreign sounding name gets nominated, and suddenly it's a big deal.

That is not the point. Neither Bush was asked because their histories were clear.

Why were there no questions about either Bush, or Clinton, or any of the other 40 men who were President?

Quite likely because there were no doubts as to their background.
 
Oh the Irony is killing me. Who said anything about the "right" liking Hilary Clinton? And an article from "Businessweek" is now talking points? No one claimed you said anything either? SO what does any of that have to do with a factual article that basically says you are wrong?

And you accuse me of building "strawmen." Hehehehe.

Excuse me while I laugh and move on.

I don't care what the Businessweek article said. I asked you if you thought a white guy named Joe Smith would have had as much trouble, and your response was "evil Democrats." Whatever the source, bringing it up is pure talking points -- I can't debate the actual question, so here's what I want you to hear.
 
That is not the point. Neither Bush was asked because their histories were clear.



Quite likely because there were no doubts as to their background.

So these questions only came up because....? I don't doubt the Bushes either, but if it was just "He should have to prove it" then they should have also.

Even after it was printed on t-shirts, we still heard "It's a fake!"
 
Actually conservatives contribute to charities at a far higher rate than libs.


"Dr. Arthur Brooks’ 2006 book, “Who Really Cares? America’s Charity Divide: Who Gives, Who Doesn’t and Why It Matters,” quoted studies pointing out the differences between the giving habits of political liberals and conservatives. In one study, households headed by a conservative gave away 30 percent more money to charity than households headed by a liberal ($1,600 to $1,227) even though the household income of liberals was 6 percent higher.

Brooks cited other studies concluding that conservatives are more likely to volunteer time to help the poor than liberals — an average of 12 percent more total hours each year. And they are more likely to donate blood. “If liberals and moderates gave blood at the same rate as conservatives, the blood supply in the United States would jump by about 45 percent,” he wrote."


Viewpoint: Conservatives give more than liberals » Letters » The Herald Bulletin


I was actually being funny when I said that. :)
 
Still can't answer a simple question, I see. The article said nothing about what I said. But that was your "answer?"

It did answer your question. Maybe if you actually read it, but no you would rather claim a false strawman. So as I said I am no longer interested in anything you have to say.

So good day.
 
Then try talking to me.

OK hi how ya doing. Well what do you think about this weather? Pretty nice I would say. Do you follow basketball? Do you scuba?

OK have a nice day, bye.
 
OK hi how ya doing. Well what do you think about this weather? Pretty nice I would say. Do you follow basketball? Do you scuba?

OK have a nice day, bye.

I am doing fine. It is quite sunny right now. No I prefer hockey to basketball. And I would love to scuba if I could.

But seriously, blaming only one party or political ideology for every instance of racism misses the point. Racism is wrong, no matter who does it and should be condemed by everyone.
 
I am doing fine. It is quite sunny right now. No I prefer hockey to basketball. And I would love to scuba if I could.

But seriously, blaming only one party or political ideology for every instance of racism misses the point. Racism is wrong, no matter who does it and should be condemed by everyone.

You did not read anything I posted did you?

Seriously....

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...ife-draw-mcconnells-ire-2.html#post1061528197

Don't blow smoke up our asses. Why don't you list the real racist sites similar to stormfront...

Tribu Ka, Génération Kémi Séba
The Nation of Islam
The Nation of Yahweh
Ku Klux Klan
The new Black Panther party
Kach
The Nubian moor Nation
The Israelite Church of God in Jesus Christ
La Raza
Jewish National Front
American Militant Extremists
Most gangs be they Black, Hispanic or white.

Free Republic. :roll:
 
And you think these groups are in any way endorsed by the national parties?

No and that is not the point. And since people seem to be to hard headed to figure it out, I say good day to you.
 
In a society which has forced and enforced multi-culturalism in order to further the political agenda of one party, there is no one who is not racist. This multi-culturalism was NOT a natural occurrence based on humanistic evolution and therefore fostered racial resentment.

The fact that the label "racist" is a valuable Liberal political weapon has resulted in the term being purposely left undefined so that it's political uses are infinite. It has been such a valuable political weapon that the Liberals have many spin offs: Homophobe, Xenophobe, bigot, misogynist, etc., etc. Racism was a Godsend to the loons, just as abortion was.

The fact is that there is no one who does not notice the race of others and conduct themselves accordingly based on known racial characteristics, be they positive or negative. Success in this regard is viewed as being able to avoid the label by one ploy or another.

An endless discussion of who is racist and who is not racist is another heated discussion searching for a non-existent conclusion.
 
OK hi how ya doing. Well what do you think about this weather? Pretty nice I would say. Do you follow basketball? Do you scuba?

OK have a nice day, bye.

Basketball?! That's racist!:shock:
 
Back
Top Bottom