- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
- Messages
- 32,516
- Reaction score
- 5,321
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
There is nothing in that piece that says Woodward was threatened by President Obama. The title of the piece is; "BOB WOODWARD: A 'Very Senior' White House Person Warned Me I'd 'Regret' What I'm Doing"lling
There is nothing in that piece that says Woodward was threatened by President Obama. The title of the piece is; "BOB WOODWARD: A 'Very Senior' White House Person Warned Me I'd 'Regret' What I'm Doing"lling
since government , the executive branch has POWER, then the average citizen, it is most assuredly is a threat.
Here are the Rules and Guidelines to help you properly use the *Breaking News* forum:
I - All Forum Rules apply here: DP Forum Rules (Forum Rules)
II - All Opening Post threads posted in *BN* must have:
• Static link to an article from a bona-fide news organization.
• Dateline within the past 48 hours.
• Exact same title as the cited article.
• Quoted short excerpts from the article.
• Your own unique content to spur discussion.
Read the Guidelines for the Breaking News forums:
No, the word threatens in not the same as warns.excuse me.... but why are you trying to use another reason now, instead of sticking with your first?
I understand the title was generated by the software, but it still breaks the guidelines. I have reported it, so we will see what happens.if you will note the link i provided states, --------> Bob Woodward: White House Threatened Me On Sequester Reporting - Business Insider
i did not make the title the web site did, and its uses the word threaten. white house threaten me (bob woodward)
No, the word threatens in not the same as warns.
I understand the title was generated by the software, but it still breaks the guidelines. I have reported it, so we will see what happens.
There is nothing in that piece that says Woodward was threatened by President Obama. The title of the piece is; "BOB WOODWARD: A 'Very Senior' White House Person Warned Me I'd 'Regret' What I'm Doing"lling
Looks to me like you are just not comfortable with the idea of Obama being portrayed as anything less than the messiah. Seriously... this isn't concerning to you at all? It isn't like it's Glen Beck or some other hack we're talking about here. We're talking about one of the most respected journalists of all time and your first impulse is to brush it aside in a nothing-to-see-here manner??Read the Guidelines for the Breaking News forums:
There is nothing in that piece that says Woodward was threatened by President Obama. The title of the piece is; "BOB WOODWARD: A 'Very Senior' White House Person Warned Me I'd 'Regret' What I'm Doing"lling
As far as I'm concerned, Woodward can either put up or shut up. His citations have never consisted of anything but unnamed "sources" and unidentified 'high ranking officials.' For all anyone knows, it could be the janitor.
Did you happen to do this because you have no legs to stand on here?
Btw, you might want to check the rules yourself.
The last three guidelines were broken in the OP.:roll:Here are the Rules and Guidelines to help you properly use the *Breaking News* forum:
I - All Forum Rules apply here: DP Forum Rules (Forum Rules)
II - All Opening Post threads posted in *BN* must have:
• Static link to an article from a bona-fide news organization.
• Dateline within the past 48 hours.
• Exact same title as the cited article.
• Quoted short excerpts from the article.
• Your own unique content to spur discussion.
No, the word threatens in not the same as warns.
I understand the title was generated by the software, but it still breaks the guidelines. I have reported it, so we will see what happens.
I know, I know. But the word is NOT in the body of the article or in the title of article.really?..do you not see the link i provided......and the word....(threatened) in it?
those words came from the web site.
I see you trying to justify the word simply because the software generated it.i see it as a feeble attempt to remove something you cannot explain away.
Woodward has presented absolutely no evidence that this occurred.
But that won't stop far right wing zealots from eating this **** up.
I see you trying to justify the word simply because the software generated it.
Woodward has presented absolutely no evidence that this occurred.
But that won't stop far right wing zealots from eating this **** up.
He has the email, so simply release it and the author of it. I think the public would be curious too.