Yes, because you are too busy to be bothered with facts. I see how you are now buddy. One of those people that just like to make baseless claims with no proof or evidence. Good for you.
Not at all. I don't think the court should have anything to do with them punishing their child. I don't agree with the punishments, if they are true, and I wouldn't treat my child the same way, but I don't think a court should have any say in the matter. If you do then you are supportive of a nanny state government. They should support the child in her right to choose, but should not interfere with the parent's right to parent. My opinion does not indicate any disdain for the child, and you are doing backflips trying to claim otherwise. You are wrong and this is your last ditch effort in trying to defend your ignorant assertion.
I do want her to have all the assistance she needs, and I want everything to go well for her, that doesn't mean that I think the court should be able to invade the parents rights to parent. I think parents should hug their kids every night before bed, but I would be against a constitutional amendment forcing parents to do so. You get the difference yet? This isn't hard to comprehend.
It's not nonsense. I think that they should allow the use of the car for the child, but that doesn't mean I support the court mandating it.
Rights have to mean something. If I support your right to say whatever you want according the constitution, does that mean that I also by definition agree with everything you say? Of course not, that's a stupid argument. Likewise, just because I think the parents have a right to parent and punish their child, it does not mean I agree with the punishment. You are ignoring the important distinctions, either because you don't get them, or on purpose, and trying to make a case out of it where there is none.
No one has criticized the child, and no one has come close to showing any evidence that the pro choice crowd is appalled by her choice, instead every pro-choice person that has spoken on the issue has stated plainly that they support her decision regardless.