- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 39,178
- Reaction score
- 9,688
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Re: Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job
93% of journalists voted dem or contributed as such--last POTUS election cycle. As far as I know all fact checkers are journalists, essentially peer reviewing their own material.
"Most" would be an understatement, if anything.
Im content to wait for you to quit playing word games to justify your illiterate responses and address the topic at hand. BTW, your response to 5 examples of inherent bias of fact checking was not substantive, if you would care to try again, do so. Dissmissal isnt a response, its a lack of one.
PS A slim majority of CEOs happen to be conservative, "most" would fit, but greedy suggests an emotive connotation that is essentially a smear, I wonder how the liberals in that group feel about that. Our conversation was about bias and how it affects fact checking, greed is not indicative of one party or the other. A big logic fail is inherent in your argument, try again.
That's what I said: YOU are not responsible for your words. You're provoked into them.
Anyway, if you are unaware of how angry you sound..kinda scary. You sound VERY angry.
If I were to say something like, "We all know most CEOs are conservative, so, well, you know" in the context of a comment in which I'm discussing the greed of CEOs, you really wouldn't interpret that as my saying most CEOS are greedy BECAUSE they're conservative????
Wow. you should. so, that you don't interpret your own words correctly is not my problem. Anyone who read "fact checking is not credible and most fact checkers are liberal, so you know..." absolutely interpreted it in exactly the same way I did.
It'd be nice if those in the party of personal responsibility actually took some themselves, rather than preaching to others about the importance of doing so, once in a while.
93% of journalists voted dem or contributed as such--last POTUS election cycle. As far as I know all fact checkers are journalists, essentially peer reviewing their own material.
"Most" would be an understatement, if anything.
Im content to wait for you to quit playing word games to justify your illiterate responses and address the topic at hand. BTW, your response to 5 examples of inherent bias of fact checking was not substantive, if you would care to try again, do so. Dissmissal isnt a response, its a lack of one.
PS A slim majority of CEOs happen to be conservative, "most" would fit, but greedy suggests an emotive connotation that is essentially a smear, I wonder how the liberals in that group feel about that. Our conversation was about bias and how it affects fact checking, greed is not indicative of one party or the other. A big logic fail is inherent in your argument, try again.