You have "no doubts"?
If Obama was "receiving reports" then why didn't he DO SOMETHING? Panetta said specifically he was NOT in contact with Obama during the attack. A US Ambassador was under attack and Obama was AWOL. One of Clinton's ambassadors was under attack and she didn't contact Panetta either or request any assistance for the guy. But "
What does it matter" to her anyway right? Oh we get it though. She gets snarky and yells at a Republican during testimony, so she gets a pass on Benghazi.
Hell Obama never once checked in to see how the situation was unfolding. Didn't ask if the ambassador was still alive. Nothing. Panetta has confirmed this under testimony. There is no doubt. This contradicts statements Obama has made about the situation in the past. It also contradicts statements Axlerod made during the campaign.
Obama:
This is a blatant lie. We know this isn't true. Panetta confirmed it.
Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack - CBS News
You don't need to have military experience to send in help when an Ambassador is under attack and begging for help. :roll:
The President is the only man who could have green lighted a cross border operation. If you have "no doubt" that he was "receiving reports" then explain to everyone why Obama did nothing. If he delegated responsibilities as you claim, ok Stevens and 3 other Americans are still DEAD. Part of being Commander in Chief and leader of this country is having competent people in place. The inability to appoint competent people is incompetence. So even if your paper thin premise was true, which relies upon some serious Obama worship, it still exposes Obama as an incompetent buffoon who isn't fit to lead our military.