• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

Re: UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

True proven science yes, not bogus science like the liberal like to use to push their false agenda. Al Boor is an excellent example. Obama is another one, I have always said Liberals are not for jobs, never have been. Kill Keystone, oil, and coal and they think the economy will prosper. And on top of that, liberals want to raise taxes. No wonder the middle class are making less now under Obama than before Obama. Damn almost forgot, then add in job killing Obamacare another job killer and tax increase. You have to wonder what science did the liberals use to come up with job killing Obamacare.

That's what you call science that doesn't fit YOUR agenda. :roll:
 
Re: UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

That's what you call science that doesn't fit YOUR agenda. :roll:

Yes, true proven science is what I can believe, but not that bogus stuff liberals want to tell us is fact. Al Boor is a great example of that. So is Obama who believes in bogus science to kill Keystone, oil and coal, which kills jobs, all in the name of bogus science they want to push to kill jobs. Like I said liberals have never been about jobs. Never. All liberals are about is making people dependent on government and if pushing bogus science can get more people dependent on government then so be it, tell the lie.
 
Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

Yes, true proven science is what I can believe, but not that bogus stuff liberals want to tell us is fact. Al Boor is a great example of that. So is Obama who believes in bogus science to kill Keystone, oil and coal, which kills jobs, all in the name of bogus science they want to push to kill jobs. Like I said liberals have never been about jobs. Never. All liberals are about is making people dependent on government and if pushing bogus science can get more people dependent on government then so be it, tell the lie.

I can't remember an article Al Gore or Obama has published in a scientific journal.

But maybe I'm wrong...
 
Re: UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

Yes, true proven science is what I can believe, but not that bogus stuff liberals want to tell us is fact. Al Boor is a great example of that. So is Obama who believes in bogus science to kill Keystone, oil and coal, which kills jobs, all in the name of bogus science they want to push to kill jobs. Like I said liberals have never been about jobs. Never. All liberals are about is making people dependent on government and if pushing bogus science can get more people dependent on government then so be it, tell the lie.

I repeat:

Originally Posted by Boo Radley
That's what you call science that doesn't fit YOUR agenda.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

I can't remember an article Al Gore or Obama has published in a scientific journal.

But maybe I'm wrong...

Odd when we talk science they talk politics. I wonder if they know the difference? :confused::confused:
 
Re: UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

Which has nothing to do with the science, which is this discussion.



The EPA is enforcing regulations intended to counteract the warming effects of CO2 which they claim are causing warming.

Of course this has something to do with this discussion.

The EPA, like you, has accepted a notion that is not based in science and is very clearly based in and is directing political discourse and action.

The EPA is a part of the Executive Branch, so, yes, this does involve President Obama as his gang of bully boys is enforcing laws that were never passed by Congress and never could be.

This, like the lack of proof for AGW, exists in the real world so it is probably escaping your notice.
 
Re: UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

That's what you call science that doesn't fit YOUR agenda. :roll:



The world has been cooling for more than a decade.

What has happened to the warming effects of CO2? Ummm... Scientifically, I mean...

Have the scientific properties of CO2 changed since the year 2002?
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

I can't remember an article Al Gore or Obama has published in a scientific journal.

But maybe I'm wrong...



No, all he has is a Nobel Prize.
 
Re: UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

I repeat:



The rate and amount of warming out of the last Ice Age was faster and greater than the warming out of the Little Ice Age which we are currently experiencing. This warming occurred in the past and was not the result of the activities of man. Therefore, the rate and amount of warming today is not unprecedented. That's one leg of your stool gone.

The current warming out of the Little Ice Age started about 150 years before the advent of increasing concentrations of CO2 due to the activities of man. Therefore the current warming which is a continuation of this is very likely natural in its origination and ongoing effects. That's two legs of your stool gone.

The measured warming since the end of the Little Ice Age occurs in 20 years spurts interrupted by 40 year periods of stability and/or cooling and this seems to have been occurring at least sine 1700. If the rise in CO2 is the driving force of warming, this 60 year cycle of warming and stalling makes no sense at all. How 'bout that? The third leg of your stool is gone.

We have entered into another of the PREDICTABLE periods of cooling or stability. This, by the by, is predictable only if we ignore the dogma of AGW Science.

See what I've done there? Observed the real world and asked questions. To buy the swindle of AGW, all you need to do is be deaf and blind and accept what you are told even though it is on conflict with the real world.
 
Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

The EPA is enforcing regulations intended to counteract the warming effects of CO2 which they claim are causing warming.
.

How come you think climatologists are right about SO2 emissions and particulates ( I assume that's what you are referring to here), but wrong about CO2 (which has been studied even more extensively)?

Oh, right. Because one set of findings doesn't fit your preformed set of conclusions. Librul plots with some scientists. And freedom.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

I can't remember an article Al Gore or Obama has published in a scientific journal.

But maybe I'm wrong...

You don't get it.

When these people speak, there are masses of lemmings that listen to them. No matter how wrong they are, people trust their BS.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

Odd when we talk science they talk politics. I wonder if they know the difference? :confused::confused:

LOL...

That's a hoot...

You guys speak the politics when you worry about the votes of scientists.

That's not science...
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

LOL...

That's a hoot...

You guys speak the politics when you worry about the votes of scientists.

That's not science...

No where have I spoke to politics. And a consensus isn't a popular vote. You fail to realize this.
 
Re: UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

The world has been cooling for more than a decade.

What has happened to the warming effects of CO2? Ummm... Scientifically, I mean...

Have the scientific properties of CO2 changed since the year 2002?

Still factually challenged:

Matalin said, "for the last decade the climate has been cooling." That suggests there has been a distinct reversal of the steady warming that scientists have documented for many years. But a review of the data shows that's not the case. The numbers show that in the past 10 years, global temperatures have not continued their sharp increase. But they have not cooled either. In fact, some years in the last decade have been hotter than the previous years. At most, they could be described as hitting a plateau. But they haven't cooled as Matalin said. We find her claim False.

PolitiFact | Matalin claims the Earth is cooling
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

How come you think climatologists are right about SO2 emissions and particulates ( I assume that's what you are referring to here), but wrong about CO2 (which has been studied even more extensively)?

Oh, right. Because one set of findings doesn't fit your preformed set of conclusions. Librul plots with some scientists. And freedom.




The climate doesn't seem to react to CO2. If you haven't noticed that, you haven't been watching.

Have you found that 30 year old prediction based on AGW Science that is correct yet?
 
Re: UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global [W:478]

Still factually challenged:

Matalin said, "for the last decade the climate has been cooling." That suggests there has been a distinct reversal of the steady warming that scientists have documented for many years. But a review of the data shows that's not the case. The numbers show that in the past 10 years, global temperatures have not continued their sharp increase. But they have not cooled either. In fact, some years in the last decade have been hotter than the previous years. At most, they could be described as hitting a plateau. But they haven't cooled as Matalin said. We find her claim False.

PolitiFact | Matalin claims the Earth is cooling




Politifact?

Is Politicfact suddenly a peer reviewed journal? I thought you were the one who repeatedly said that this was a matter of science and not one of politics.

Why not check the data collection agencies of the world to find the actual answer?

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

How come you think climatologists are right about SO2 emissions and particulates ( I assume that's what you are referring to here), but wrong about CO2 (which has been studied even more extensively)?

Oh, right. Because one set of findings doesn't fit your preformed set of conclusions. Librul plots with some scientists. And freedom.



Actually, what i'm referring to is the ineffectual attacks on the coal industry and industries that use coal as fuel.

Fears that new EPA regulations could kill coal industry | Fox News Video

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs...sleads-the-public-in-her-crusade-against-coal
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

No where have I spoke to politics. And a consensus isn't a popular vote. You fail to realize this.



If this is actually based on science and consensus is not a popular vote, then, by all means, present the link to the scientific organization that has elevated this notion to the level of being a scientific theory.

Lacking, post the link to the scientific organization that has defined the test by which this notion can be falsified.

Lacking both of these, as you will be lacking, post the link to any scientist who has done either of these things.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

If this is actually based on science and consensus is not a popular vote, then, by all means, present the link to the scientific organization that has elevated this notion to the level of being a scientific theory.

Lacking, post the link to the scientific organization that has defined the test by which this notion can be falsified.

Lacking both of these, as you will be lacking, post the link to any scientist who has done either of these things.

One of the reasons you're not worth responding to is that you ask for what you already have. :roll:
 
Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

Actually, what i'm referring to is the ineffectual attacks on the coal industry and industries that use coal as fuel.

Fears that new EPA regulations could kill coal industry | Fox News Video

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs...sleads-the-public-in-her-crusade-against-coal

Yep. They are taking away our freedoms!

Of course, its the freedom do die early from respiratory disease, but !freedom!
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

One of the reasons you're not worth responding to is that you ask for what you already have. :roll:



What I have is the lead pipe assurance that you cannot provide these things.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

What I have is the lead pipe assurance that you cannot provide these things.

Again, provided. Again, and again. :coffeepap
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

Yep. They are taking away our freedoms!

Of course, its the freedom do die early from respiratory disease, but !freedom!



You said that you assumed something.

What you assumed was incorrect. That you assumed something without foundation is not new. That what you assumed is wrong is not new.

I set you straight and you seem annoyed that the real world once again intrudes into your imaginary world.

Now you try to say that I am saying something that I am not saying and that the links did not say.

It must be an interesting world to live in where facts and reality are seldom acknowledged.

Both the air and the water of the USA are cleaner today than they have been since WW2.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

Again, provided. Again, and again. :coffeepap



Why do you think that you have provided this? You have not. Do you think that lying about this makes the lack of evidence any less glaring. You have no basis for anything you have said about science.

When you say that all you have said is that there is a consensus and the consensus is what you base your faith on, that is acceptable. Empty, but acceptable.

When you say the science supports this, you need to provide the link to the science that you claim supports your assertion. In short, you need to put up or shut up.

You do neither.
 
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global ...

Why do you think that you have provided this? You have not. Do you think that lying about this makes the lack of evidence any less glaring. You have no basis for anything you have said about science.

When you say that all you have said is that there is a consensus and the consensus is what you base your faith on, that is acceptable. Empty, but acceptable.

When you say the science supports this, you need to provide the link to the science that you claim supports your assertion. In short, you need to put up or shut up.

You do neither.
Jr, your either one lying, or you can't read for comprehension. I don't know which, but :2wave:
 
Back
Top Bottom