- Joined
- Jul 13, 2012
- Messages
- 47,695
- Reaction score
- 10,467
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Re: Report shows UN admitting solar activity may play significant role in global warm
So your argument is that your mom told you so and that must be the truth.
I am saying that this thing does not exist and the climate record does not support your assertion that it does. By saying there are lots of people getting paid to say this does not make it true. This is a notion that is not supported by actual real world proof.
It requires only one "brick" of doubt to doubt and I have several.
To doubt the existence of things like AGW or UFO's, one need only look for the solid proof. I only want you to present it. Doubt does not require anything more than one little crack in the wall of proof. The case for AGW doesn't have enough proof to make a wall to have a crack.
You can start with this: If CO2 is the prime driver of climate and if more CO2 will always create higher temperatures, why do they not create higher temperatures than ever before right now? We have only recently warmed to a point of warming prevalent about 5000 years ago. We have vacillated in the Holocene within about a 2 degree range of temperature and we are right now just about in the middle. If you notion was real in the real world, we would be at the highest point of temperature in the Holocene. We are not.
It is your side that Cherry picks and it is only through Cherry picking that your little house of cards can stand.
If you have a case, then use it and eliminate my doubts.
View attachment 67151429
And I have. For the tenth time:
That there is a lot of different scientific evidence that builds a case. You choosing to cherry pick only one brick and ignoring the rest is weak (that's my first claim). Especially when you don't seem to understand even that cherry picked brick.
I linked an article arguing that your side side does just this, and enumerated the list of evidence.
I also claimed that there is a solid scientific consensus on this subject. Linked a few articles to support this.
For good measure, I also linked articles showing various evidence.
Now, my claims are easy to understand. They are well supported. And you have failed to address even one. Feigning ignorance is hardly an effective strategy.
So your argument is that your mom told you so and that must be the truth.
I am saying that this thing does not exist and the climate record does not support your assertion that it does. By saying there are lots of people getting paid to say this does not make it true. This is a notion that is not supported by actual real world proof.
It requires only one "brick" of doubt to doubt and I have several.
To doubt the existence of things like AGW or UFO's, one need only look for the solid proof. I only want you to present it. Doubt does not require anything more than one little crack in the wall of proof. The case for AGW doesn't have enough proof to make a wall to have a crack.
You can start with this: If CO2 is the prime driver of climate and if more CO2 will always create higher temperatures, why do they not create higher temperatures than ever before right now? We have only recently warmed to a point of warming prevalent about 5000 years ago. We have vacillated in the Holocene within about a 2 degree range of temperature and we are right now just about in the middle. If you notion was real in the real world, we would be at the highest point of temperature in the Holocene. We are not.
It is your side that Cherry picks and it is only through Cherry picking that your little house of cards can stand.
If you have a case, then use it and eliminate my doubts.
View attachment 67151429