- Joined
- Dec 20, 2012
- Messages
- 7,302
- Reaction score
- 3,402
- Location
- Northern Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Kg
I haven't made any conclusion, I stated facts, which I note you have not shown wrong.Meaningless obfuscation and subterfuge, as apparently usual for you. :roll:
You again go to lengths to pick on fine points that are simply not in debate question .. come to erroneous conclusions with them .. and then use those erroneous conclusions as a premise to your ultimate erroneous conclusion that the "January" BLS aren't mostly about December, when they obviously are, as your own hedging in explanation validates.
because it's not true, no matter how many times you repeat it. Good God! I showed you multiple BLS sources that proved you wrong. The change is the difference between the 2nd week of December and the 2nd week of January as 2 static weeks. But please, quote and link to where on the BLS site your claim is supported.Truly, what is your issue with the reality that these reports are mostly for December, the second week in December thru the first week in January?!
Give me a name, I'll call him myself. You are mistaken, though. I still don't get how you think your one interview, where you clearly misunderstood things such as who conducts the establishment survey, trumps my many weeks of training and discussions with many, many people at BLSThe rest of your post is mostly simply repeating your insinuated opinion, simply because you don't like the truth of things as they are, especially about the fact that the number of discouraged workers is considerably greater than reported, as the BLS agent told me.