Is that so? You understand my point? Sure doesn't seem like it, since you keep asking me questions i've answered a ton. But I've definitely understood your points....you just keep wanting to run away from them after they get blown out of the water, and refuse to acknowledge you were wrong while continue to argue as if the assumptions you made were true. You keep trying to reinvent your "point". Lets actually look at your "points"...
One point you keep seeming to make was that this group was just wanting to be a general club, an association of people with a common interest, rather than actually being sanctioned by the School and gaining the benefits of said sanction.
Another point you kept making was that the school was biased or discriminatory, and that other clubs denied membership or leadership positions for the things this club was being removed for.
Yet another point you tried to suggest was that Christians in particular were being targeted while other groups got a free pass.
Your final three points were thus: That it’s dumb to have a rule that says a Club aimed at a specific class of people, though you only speak about Christianity, can’t deny membership to those that are not part of that class of people; AND that people are suggesting the club has to have non-Christian members; AND that non-christians probably wouldn’t want to join a christian club.
You started primarily making these points after your earlier points, that you can see above, got demolished. The problem with these points however are multifaceted
- There’s a number of people, including two you’re actually arguing with and directing the posts where you make the point, in this thread that AGREE with you that the rule is dumb and that non-christians probably wouldn’t want to join the club. However, your issue is that BECAUSE you think the rule is dumb then you believe they’ve been “discriminated against” or the university is “biased” or that “Christians” were targeted, as I showed by highlighting your OTHER points.
- You’re continually posting a strawman that is suggesting that people are saying the club has to have non-Christian members or leaders. No one in this thread has stated that, Michigan hasn’t stated that, no one has stated that. All that’s been stated is they’re not allowed to BAR non-Christians from becoming members. No one said they had to actually have some as members.
- You create your arguments in trying to support these points utilizing your earlier points, that I showed above, which are factually incorrect and reference a situation that is completely and utterly fabricated and has no bearing on the reality of this situation. Meaning that while yes, you’re general point is correct, the surrounding logic about your point, the purpose of your point, and the conclusion your point is trying to reach are all horribly wrong and entirely based on ignorance of the situation.