• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Israel gave birth control to Ethiopian Jews without their consent [W:283,569]

Well, unless you know what words actually mean. Then he ends up being wrong. Darn dictionaries...

so all you have is condecending hyperbole.... like I said, you have no logic..nor can you debate...
 
You said, basically, I was ignoring the moral issue in favor of petty terminology.
I pointed out (and do again) I already said It was wrong in Either case.
So much for the gist of what you said.

Also again, Tucker had made the terminology an issue not me.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...s-without-their-consent-3.html#post1061404155

I did pursue it but HE was the one who wrongly conflated it and then made that terminology a legitimate sub-debate, Several times before I entered the string.

Are we clear on the genesis of this line now?
Are we clear I said it was wrong in Either case/terminology?

Now you are just building a straw man. Hint: downplaying is not the same as ignoring. Words have meanings. Something you are still struggling with.
 
I read this through my mobile! I can't believe it! They are practicing just what the Nazi's did to them!
 
so all you have is condecending hyperbole.... like I said, you have no logic..nor can you debate...

The Israel apologists are getting their ass kicked from one side of this forum to another...yet they think they are winning.
 
Last edited:
I read this through my mobile! I can't believe it! They are practicing just what the Nazi's did to them!

I think most were reluctant to bring it up...
 
Now you are just building a straw man. Hint: downplaying is not the same as ignoring. Words have meanings. Something you are still struggling with.
No strawman, just references to exactly what happened (what was said and when) in this string and how you perverted it and took sides for petty personal reasons.
Conduct unbecoming for all to see.

Your post is Nonsense Baiting with zero content.
Why? You were 100% answered/Refuted in my last.
 
Last edited:
The Israel apologists are getting their ass kicked from side of this forum to another...yet they think they are winning.

Oh, please, you got pwnd.
 
The Israel apologists are getting their ass kicked from side of this forum to another...yet they think they are winning.

not really... and there is nothing to aplogise for...

but arent you late to a Klan rally?
 
I read this through my mobile! I can't believe it! They are practicing just what the Nazi's did to them!

Yea... its exactly the same.. even though its not the same at all...

its more the same as Obama and late term abortion and planned parenthood...oh wait.. Obama supports the KILLING of a living person...
 
This should be lesson to everyone reading but not posting on this thread.

yea.. we learned a lot.... just not what you think...we learned that there are racists and bigots on the site..
 
This should be lesson to everyone reading but not posting on this thread.

When the researcher admits that her interview methods and analysis ignored basic developing world gender considerations, and that she is shifting the focus of her study to the impacts of developing world immigration on social decisions made by women, then she, as well as I, will be vindicated.

I should go to Israel and conduct an interview with the same people, "discover" the sociological factors omitted and take charge of her research.
 
not really... and there is nothing to aplogise for...

but arent you late to a Klan rally?

ANOTHER TIER!

The antisemitism crap ain't working, let's move to the KLAN ACCUSATIONS. Maybe that will stick?

That's the ticket!

1986-03-15-11.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yea... its exactly the same.. even though its not the same at all...

its more the same as Obama and late term abortion and planned parenthood...oh wait.. Obama supports the KILLING of a living person...

Before Nazi's sent them to camps this option of forceful sterilization was considered to be used on the Jews just like it was used for 400,000 Deutche people themselves.

The Biological State: Nazi Racial Hygiene, 1933?1939
 
So readers of this thread can keep up, members who support and advocate for Ethiopan women who were coerced into taking long effecting birth control so the Jewish Temples in Israel weren't filled with darkies are now SUPPORTERS OF THE KLAN!

"Quit frakking with those Ethiopian women or I'll be all over you ass like ugly on a gorilla!"

kkk2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Quick question for you and the mouse in your pocket: How, exactly, can the eggs be fertilized if the drug in question prevents ovulation?
I am more that sure you know of other ways in which the egg can be fertilized.
And lack of ovulation does not make a person sterile.


You're own quote mentions the inability to produce "children", not the viability of ovum.
And as the eggs can be fertilized the person is not sterile.

And I also cited the same as you to prove you wrong.

1 a process or act that renders a person unable to produce children. See also hysterectomy, tubal ligation, vasectomy.

Their egg is still capable of being fertilized. As such they are not sterile.
The correct wording should be contraceptive, or birth control. Not sterilization.
Sterilization is improperly used. And it is done to cast aspersions. It is the wrong word, and attempting to use it that way makes it more wrong.

I know! That's why it was so ****ing funny that you then said later that a tubal ligation wasn't sterilization! It demonstrated the sheer breadth of your incompetence in this discussion. :lol:
Yes it has demonstrated your incompetence.
You seem to think that it means that they are one in the same when they are not.

That is your problem.

The contraceptive does not render the individual sterile.
It wouldn't be a contraceptive if it was.


And even th eother source you provided shows you to be wrong.
a : to deprive of the power of reproducing
As they can still reproduce, because the egg is still fertile, you are wrong.

It is nothing more than a contraceptive.
 
Can anybody believe Excon is still arguing the definition of sterilization?
 
Can anybody believe Excon is still arguing the definition of sterilization?

You are letting your emotions get the best of you!
 
So readers of this thread can keep up, members who support and advocate for Ethiopan women who were coerced into taking long effecting birth control so the Jewish Temples in Israel weren't filled with darkies are now SUPPORTERS OF THE KLAN!

"Quit frakking with those Ethiopian women or I'll be all over you ass like ugly on a gorilla!"

View attachment 67141579

Hopefully the readers of this thread can recognize the blatant dishonesty of this post. If you have kicked ass, or whatever, why the need to lie?
 
Last edited:
And as the eggs can be fertilized the person is not sterile.

we have the definition you provided, from a medical dictionary, and other definitions from other medical dictionaries, and all did not base the dependency for "steralization" on the viability of the ovum.

But I have no interest arguing the same point with you and the reader surly has enough info to make up their own mind
 
I read this through my mobile! I can't believe it! They are practicing just what the Nazi's did to them!
No they are not.
Contraceptives are not sterilizations.


I think most were reluctant to bring it up...
As contraceptives are not sterilizations. You are wrong.


Which further goes to show why proper terminology should be used.
It is a contraceptive. Not sterilization.
 
Hopefully the readers of this thread can recognize the blatant dishonesty of this post.

Really? After this post by Travis"

"but arent you late to a Klan rally?"

X, people can read.
 
we have the definition you provided, from a medical dictionary, and other definitions from other medical dictionaries, and all did not base the dependency for "steralization" on the viability of the ovum.

But I have no interest arguing the same point with you and the reader surly has enough info to make up their own mind
Right! :doh

As we saw, the actual definitions did not fit.
People should be educated enough to know that sterilization and contraception are not the same.
But apparently some don't know the difference.
Apparently folks like playing fast and lose with definitions like the author of a book does.
Doesn't make them right in any sense of the word.

Are you one of them?
 
Last edited:
your over reaction to this story tells me all I need to know about you.... amazing how we find out so much...

In Saudi Arabia they just kill women ...Im sure you are enraged over that..

So Israel's government can do no wrong in your book. We know that, after all you've accused me of being an anti-semite for not showing the appropriate amount of worship for St. Bibi.

So the fact that this happened doesn't bother you? You can't even look at the government doing that and say "That's wrong?"

Of course not, all you can do is toss insults at liberals. We see it in every thread you participate in.
 
Really? After this post by Travis"

"but arent you late to a Klan rally?"

X, people can read.

I can read too. You're calling certain posters here actual advocates of forced sterilizations, etc. That's obvious bull****.
 
Back
Top Bottom