• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

pharmacist shoots and kills potential assasin and robber

Dittohead not!

master political analyst
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
52,009
Reaction score
33,943
Location
The Golden State
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
[h=1]Madera pharmacy owner shoots, kills suspect[/h]
The pharmacy owner returned fire on the suspects, killing one of them. The other suspect got away.

At this point, investigators believe the pharmacy owner acted in self-defense.
A motive is also unclear. Though it was originally reported as an armed robbery, police said because the suspects simply walked in and started shooting, their intentions are unknown.

Good news: The business owner had a gun of his own, and killed one of the criminals.

Bad news: One of them got away.

More gun control, anyone?

 
[h=1]Madera pharmacy owner shoots, kills suspect[/h]


Good news: The business owner had a gun of his own, and killed one of the criminals.

Bad news: One of them got away.

More gun control, anyone?


He did it without carrying a 30 clip assault riffle. I feel almost everyone should be carrying a ranged weapon (especially in World of Warcraft). Just not something with a huge clip capacity if youre a civilian. A 1911 is perfect. Want lots of bullets then carry lots of clips.
 
He did it without carrying a 30 clip assault riffle. I feel almost everyone should be carrying a ranged weapon (especially in World of Warcraft). Just not something with a huge clip capacity if youre a civilian. A 1911 is perfect. Want lots of bullets then carry lots of clips.

The argument about clips is for morons. aka liberals. All are stupid dumbass idiots, as is displayed over and over here. The pharmacist was fortunately able to get the job done with a limited number of rounds. Should he have had a limit, like at a carnival or some such liberal bull**** ? Is this "if you can't kill him in 8 shots", then you lose ?

Lemme guess Sherlock. If you are a pharamicist, with a shop you built for 20 years, and some hoodie comes in to rob you, you need to be limited in your ability to defend, by either some absurdly governed clip, of as you say "your ability to carry lots of clips" ? Do you realize how liberally retarded, aka ignorant, your point was ?

Such as you make me sick for the Republic.
 
Last edited:
The argument about clips is for morons. aka liberals. All are stupid dumbass idiots, as is displayed over and over here. The pharmacist was fortunately able to get the job done with a limitied number of rounds. Should he have had a limit, like at a carnival or some such liberal bull**** ? Is this "if you can't kill him in 8 shots, then you lose ?

:lol: A Carnival is liberal BS? And youre not limited with 8 bullets if you have another clip. High capacity clips are not needed by civilians. 2nd amendment doesnt say you should have the ability to buy any damn weapon you want.

Lemme guess Sherlock. I fyou ar ea pharamicist, with a shop you built for 20 years, and some hoodie comes in to rob you, you need to be limited in your ability to defend by either some absudly governed clip, of as you say "your ability to carry lots of clips" ? Do you realize how liberally retarded, aka ignorant, your point was ?

Such as you make me sick for the Republic. ?

Do YOU realize that YOU will never need high capacity clips except in your fantasy dreams? I know you have a hard-on for some type of glory-based shoot out where at the end you say... "SEE! I needed every damn bullet in that high capacity clip or we would have ALL been KILLED!".
In reality maybe you suck at firearms and you cant eject and reload fast enough :roll:

 
Last edited:
:lol: A Carnival is liberal BS? And youre not limited with 8 bullets if you have another clip. High capacity clips are not needed by civilians. 2nd amendment doesnt say you should have the ability to buy any damn weapon you want.

Hey Sherlock. The 2nd Amendment say "uninfringed". But back to the point, how about you are a business owner, being robbed, and you only have 8 shots. The bad guys got twice that. At least you can die in accordance with the law ?

You make me sick. Twice. You clearly have no clue about the 2nd Amendment, and the intent of the Founders.

Maroon.
 
Good for him, I'm glad he was able to protect innocent life. Many chain pharmacies will not allow pharmacists to have weapons and staff are trained to give into the demands of robbers who want drugs because they say it protects life (and I agree with them). However, if a criminal's intent is to rob and be violent (in this case where the mother was shot) someone should absolutely dispatch of these animals using a firearm (which is were many store policies would be detrimental to staff, patients, and customers). If I ever ran my own pharmacy as an independent I would definitely bring a gun with me to work.
 
He did it without carrying a 30 clip assault riffle. I feel almost everyone should be carrying a ranged weapon (especially in World of Warcraft). Just not something with a huge clip capacity if youre a civilian. A 1911 is perfect. Want lots of bullets then carry lots of clips.

if you actually were well trained in tactical gun use you might understand that in some cases a THIRTY ROUND magazine is Ideal, in other cases its not. In some cases a double barrel rifle is an ideal defensive weapon (i.e. charging lions in Kenyan brush) in other cases a revolver is preferred-shooting through one's coat pocket when grabbed by surprise

people like you probably think one can win the Masters using one golf club
 
Good for him, I'm glad he was able to protect innocent life. Many chain pharmacies will not allow pharmacists to have weapons and staff are trained to give into the demands of robbers who want drugs because they say it protects life (and I agree with them). However, if a criminal's intent is to rob and be violent (in this case where the mother was shot) someone should absolutely dispatch of these animals using a firearm (which is were many store policies would be detrimental to staff, patients, and customers). If I ever ran my own pharmacy as an independent I would definitely bring a gun with me to work.


Working a pharmacy can be even more dangerous now days than the local bank.
 
Hey Sherlock. The 2nd Amendment say "uninfringed". But back to the point, how about you are a business owner, being robbed, and you only have 8 shots. The bad guys got twice that. At least you can die in accordance with the law ?

You make me sick. Twice. You clearly have no clue about the 2nd Amendment, and the intent of the Founders.

Maroon.

I am not Sherlock. This is Sherlock: BBC One - Sherlock
It was created by the executive producer of Doctor Who :)

Anyhow... please see my previous message.
Bottom line is Im right and you are not.
 
Working a pharmacy can be even more dangerous now days than the local bank.

I know several pharmacies that are robbed on average roughly 3-5 times per year. One of my clinical rotation sites is in a rough neighborhood and I was told by an upperclassmen that an armed guard walks staff/students to and from the pharmacy to their cars after dark. People rob pharmacies for the drugs and not so much for the money. I would suspect that these robberies are increasing as prescription drug abuse (and illegal sales on the street) increase. Some people tend to also get very violent when they are denied medications as well (like drug addicts trying to fill a prescription several days too soon).
 
He did it without carrying a 30 clip assault riffle. I feel almost everyone should be carrying a ranged weapon (especially in World of Warcraft). Just not something with a huge clip capacity if youre a civilian. A 1911 is perfect. Want lots of bullets then carry lots of clips.

What is a 30 clip assault rifle?
 
The argument about clips is for morons. aka liberals. All are stupid dumbass idiots, as is displayed over and over here. The pharmacist was fortunately able to get the job done with a limited number of rounds. Should he have had a limit, like at a carnival or some such liberal bull**** ? Is this "if you can't kill him in 8 shots", then you lose ?

Lemme guess Sherlock. If you are a pharamicist, with a shop you built for 20 years, and some hoodie comes in to rob you, you need to be limited in your ability to defend, by either some absurdly governed clip, of as you say "your ability to carry lots of clips" ? Do you realize how liberally retarded, aka ignorant, your point was ?

Such as you make me sick for the Republic.

The point of the small clip size idea isn't IMO to make defending yourself a carnival game where if you miss 8 times you lose and get robed/killed. Rather it is to reduce the death tolls of mass shootings of innocents by limiting the amount of people the shooter is able to kill by limiting the clip size of the shooters available weapons, well still making it possible for a good citizen to defend themselves from attack. Unless your being attacked by a small army a small hand gun should be more then enough to defend yourself from an assailant. In this story you can clearly see the pharmacist was able to defend himself without a military grade machine gun.
 
if you actually were well trained in tactical gun use you might understand that in some cases a THIRTY ROUND magazine is Ideal, in other cases its not. In some cases a double barrel rifle is an ideal defensive weapon (i.e. charging lions in Kenyan brush) in other cases a revolver is preferred-shooting through one's coat pocket when grabbed by surprise

people like you probably think one can win the Masters using one golf club

You are not in the Kenyan brush. In fact you are not in any brush. Maybe a hair brush. Then again why does a turtle need a hair brush? *tossing sardine*
No civilian needs a 30 round magazine. Learn how to eject and reload. Its fun.
 
The point of the small clip size idea isn't IMO to make defending yourself a carnival game where if you miss 8 times you lose and get robed/killed. Rather it is to reduce the death tolls of mass shootings of innocents by limiting the amount of people the shooter is able to kill by limiting the clip size of the shooters available weapons, well still making it possible for a good citizen to defend themselves from attack. Unless your being attacked by a small army a small hand gun should be more then enough to defend yourself from an assailant. In this story you can clearly see the pharmacist was able to defend himself without a military grade machine gun.

Welcome Hummingbird! :2wave:
 
I believe the view of anti-gun people is that Dr is a criminal who should be prosecuted. He should have given the robbers everything and anything they wanted, and then called the police (if he was still alive). If not, at least he wasn't a criminal when he died.

^ THAT is the anti-gun position. They just like to dodge it when topics like this comes up.
 
I know several pharmacies that are robbed on average roughly 3-5 times per year. One of my clinical rotation sites is in a rough neighborhood and I was told by an upperclassmen that an armed guard walks staff/students to and from the pharmacy to their cars after dark. People rob pharmacies for the drugs and not so much for the money. I would suspect that these robberies are increasing as prescription drug abuse (and illegal sales on the street) increase. Some people tend to also get very violent when they are denied medications as well (like drug addicts trying to fill a prescription several days too soon).

I work with a number of pharmacies and some are very on top of keeping track of people who also try getting control substances from multi physician scripts. Then there are some that really don't seem to care.
Have had a few pharmacists work with me in nailing down some patients who have abused the script route.
When a patient calls you and tells you that their 2 yr old just knocked over a full bottle of their Lortabs down into the toilet there is this red flag that comes up. It is always the Lortab that got knocked over never the Coreg.
 
He did it without carrying a 30 clip assault riffle. I feel almost everyone should be carrying a ranged weapon (especially in World of Warcraft). Just not something with a huge clip capacity if youre a civilian. A 1911 is perfect. Want lots of bullets then carry lots of clips.

They are MAGAZINES not CLIPS and we are talking about real firearms for real life situtations, not some video game. This is why it is so difficult to take people like you seriously in a discussion about legislating against a tenent of our founding structure. Those of us who live differently than you do don't need your uninformed opinion making changes that will not affect you. One of the possible causes of these types of shootings is a disconnection from reality. These people are playing a game and don't see their victims as people. They see them as targets in a game, not a life ending but points on a scoreboard. Have you ever fired a 1911? Have you ever carried one? They are relatively huge, heavy and cumbersome for concealed carry.
 
What is a 30 clip assault rifle?

Heh... i was waiting for someone to mention there is no such thing. Its a rifle made to eject bullets quickly and often has large capacity magazines. They can kill stuff real quick. Very efficiently and effectively.
 
You are not in the Kenyan brush. In fact you are not in any brush. Maybe a hair brush. Then again why does a turtle need a hair brush? *tossing sardine*
No civilian needs a 30 round magazine. Learn how to eject and reload. Its fun.

how long do you think you would last against me in a gun fight? you can have a machine gun and by the time you figure out how to rack the bolt and find the firing mechanism I suspect I could have shot you for times with a cap and ball revolver. :mrgreen:

you seem to think that killing to save one's life should be "sporting" sort of like if you are mugged its unfair to kick the mugger in the nuts or shank his ass with a hidden blade. You obviously have never shot anyone or had someone try to shank you (I have experienced both unpleasantries)

seriously? I can shoot a revolver 12 times in under 4 seconds

and if those 30 round magazines have no use for a civilian against criminals why do every major CIVILIAN police department issue them to CIVILIAN employees
 
They are MAGAZINES not CLIPS and we are talking about real firearms for real life situtations, not some video game. This is why it is so difficult to take people like you seriously in a discussion about legislating against a tenent of our founding structure. Those of us who live differently than you do don't need your uninformed opinion making changes that will not affect you. One of the possible causes of these types of shootings is a disconnection from reality. These people are playing a game and don't see their victims as people. They see them as targets in a game, not a life ending but points on a scoreboard. Have you ever fired a 1911? Have you ever carried one? They are relatively huge, heavy and cumbersome for concealed carry.

Why does the government NOT allow a civilian to have a armed, fully functional tank? :roll:
 
Heh... i was waiting for someone to mention there is no such thing. Its a rifle made to eject bullets quickly and often has large capacity magazines. They can kill stuff real quick. Very efficiently and effectively.

30 round semi auto rifle-30 lethal projectiles in 6-7 seconds (average shooter)

9 shot remington pump gun loaded with #4 buckshot shells

THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY lethal projectiles in 3 seconds
 
how long do you think you would last against me in a gun fight? you can have a machine gun and by the time you figure out how to rack the bolt and find the firing mechanism I suspect I could have shot you for times with a cap and ball revolver. :mrgreen:

you seem to think that killing to save one's life should be "sporting" sort of like if you are mugged its unfair to kick the mugger in the nuts or shank his ass with a hidden blade. You obviously have never shot anyone or had someone try to shank you (I have experienced both unpleasantries)

seriously? I can shoot a revolver 12 times in under 4 seconds

and if those 30 round magazines have no use for a civilian against criminals why do every major CIVILIAN police department issue them to CIVILIAN employees

I have fired nearly every type of hand gun around. My favorite BTW is a 686 S&W w/ ported barrel. In any case it sounds like you are REALLY good at firearms. Cool. You dont need a 30 round mag.
 
Why does the government NOT allow a civilian to have a armed, fully functional tank? :roll:

hard to say-there is nothing in the constitution that actually allows the federal government such power but the country is full of congressional actions that are not properly constitutional but why do you anti gunners use such moronic hyperbolic BS

police departments do not generally have M1 Abrams with 105 smoothbore cannon or triaxial mounted 50 caliber machine guns or Hughes Chain guns

IF ITS IN COMMON USE
and if its not UNUSUALLY DANGEROUS

its protected by the most recent USSC decisions

semi auto rifles meet the Heller test
 
I have fired nearly every type of hand gun around. My favorite BTW is a 686 S&W w/ ported barrel. In any case it sounds like you are REALLY good at firearms. Cool. You dont need a 30 round mag.

you seem to think that I should be handicapped if a 5-6 body armor wearing thugs come to rob

if cops have it, I should too
 
Back
Top Bottom