Guy Incognito
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 14, 2010
- Messages
- 11,216
- Reaction score
- 2,846
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Understood, but HL is challenging the law because they disagree with it, and they can do that. If Obamacare, which is unconstitutional, was upheld by the SCOTUS, I see no reason why they wouldn't side with HL on this. The SCOTUS ruling on Obamacare basically states that the Constitution really doesn't matter. That sets up a scary precedent for the future.
That's completely absurd. PACA was always on sound constitutional footing. It's a tax, it's always been a tax, and taxes have always been constitutional. End of story.
This is completely different and nothing about the PACA ruling, which was sound, bears on this Hobby Lobby issue. Totally unrelated constitutional issues.