• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News contributor punched in face at pro-union protests in Michigan [W:867]

Catawba said:
You forgot to attach the arrest report!
Click to expand...
:lamo
Don't need one at this time. Duh!:doh

The Police have already stated they are ready to Prosecute.
 
rocket88 said:
You should just come out and admit that if the Fox News guy punched the union guy, you'd be applauding him.

Arrest the guy for assault, but that doesn't change the fact that his cause is just.

Don't watch this video if you don't want to face the truth about who you support.

Click to expand...


Big difference hear is you won't see me excusing this behavior like virtually all the libs are doing for the union thug.
 
sawyerloggingon said:
Big difference hear is you won't see me excusing this behavior like virtually all the libs are doing for the union thug.
Click to expand...

I'm not excusing anybody for violence. But when you say things about "look who you support," I challenge you to do the same.
 
Catawba said:
Right, just let your imagination fly, facts be damned!
Click to expand...
:doh
Apparently it is you who are ignoring the facts.

Fact - The guy was complicit in the trying to take down and damage the tent.
Fact - The guy swung on Crowder.

Fact - State Police have already said they are ready top Prosecute.


But continue on ignoring these. It is hilarious. :lamo:lamo
 
rocket88 said:
I'm not excusing anybody for violence. But when you say things about "look who you support," I challenge you to do the same.
Click to expand...
The only thing wrong in the video was trying to make the other side look bad because of a supposed insensitivity displayed at a demonstration. :doh

Sorry, but their position is and was correct.
 
Last edited:
rocket88 said:
I'm not excusing anybody for violence. But when you say things about "look who you support," I challenge you to do the same.
Click to expand...


If you are not excuse making for the union thug then you are the only lib in here not Doing so, thank you. On the OP video though look at the entire crowd of thugs not just sucker punch b***. It is a mob.
 
Excon said:
:doh
Apparently it is you who are ignoring the facts.

Fact - The guy was complicit in the trying to take down and damage the tent.
Fact - The guy swung on Crowder.

Fact - State Police have already said they are ready top Prosecute.


But continue on ignoring these. It is hilarious. :lamo:lamo
Click to expand...


Again, no police report, just your wild ass interpretation!
 
Excon said:
:doh
Still with your ridiculous attempts to justifies the guys action? Pathetic.
You got nothing.
And where the heck did you get this idea of "seeing" when I clearly said you can hear Crowder exclaim?
Click to expand...

Do you have forensic analysis that it was Crowder?

Or that he was speaking to the poor fellow he knocked to the ground?

No.

You don't.
 
Catawba said:
Again, no police report, just your wild ass interpretation!
Click to expand...
More ignoring from you go figure! Huh?

We have video, and the State Police have already stated they are ready to Prosecute.

What does your side have? Nothing but wild ass speculation! Speculation that you try and assert the other is engaging in.
 
Last edited:
What if...? said:
Do you have forensic analysis that it was Crowder?

Or that he was speaking to the poor fellow he knocked to the ground?

No.

You don't.
Click to expand...

Is this how you try and defend your idiotic position.
No forensic evidence? What a ****en joke.
Nor did he knock the guy to the ground as we can see in the video. Crowder's back was to him, as he fell to Crowder's side.
It was Crowder's voice as we can hear that it is his voice.
 
Excon said:
More ignoring from you go figure! Huh?

We have video, and the State Police have already stated they are ready to Prosecute.

What does your side have? Nothing but wild ass speculation! Speculation that you try and assert the other is engaging in.
Click to expand...



Let's see this supposed statement from the "State Police"?
 
Excon said:
Is this how you try and defend your idiotic position.
No forensic evidence? What a ****en joke.
Nor did he knock the guy to the ground as we can see in the video. Crowder's back was to him, as he fell to Crowder's side.
It was Crowder's voice as we can hear that it is his voice.
Click to expand...

So Crowders back was to him but he was speaking to him.

What kind of crazy topological universe do you reside in?
 
What if...? said:
Do you have forensic analysis that it was Crowder?

Or that he was speaking to the poor fellow he knocked to the ground?

No.

You don't.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? He never knocked any poor fellow to the ground?
 
Catawba said:
Let's see this supposed statement from the "State Police"?
Click to expand...

No. You follow the damn topic as it has already been provided.
I am not going to play fetch for you.
That is your fault for not paying attention.
Find it on your own.

The State Police are ready to investigate and Prosecute.
All Crowder has to do is come forward to press charges.

And, as we all know, he issued a challenge to the thug.

Se we will see what happens.

But none of that negate what is clearly viewable in the videos. He swung on Crowder.
 
Excon said:
No. You follow the damn topic as it has already been provided.
I am not going to play fetch for you.
That is your fault for not paying attention.
Find it on your own.

The State Police are ready to investigate and Prosecute.
All Crowder has to do is come forward to press charges.

And, as we all know, he issued a challenge to the thug.

Se we will see what happens.

But none of that negate what is clearly viewable in the videos. He swung on Crowder.
Click to expand...



You said, and I quote:


Excon said:
We have video, and the State Police have already stated they are ready to Prosecute.
Click to expand...


I call bull crap that the State police have made any such statement.

If you can prove its not BS, do it!
 
What if...? said:
So Crowders back was to him but he was speaking to him.

What kind of crazy topological universe do you reside in?
Click to expand...
Ah. Do try and pay attention to what has been said. You obviously never watched the video because it appears you are speaking from your posterior.
Which can be the only explanation for you not understanding what was said, unless you simply didn't read it.
Or maybe it is a case of you reading what you want to be said, instead of what was actually said.
Truth be known - I have no idea why you would say such a ridiculous thing.

Excon said:
From the video in the OP you can clearly see that Crowder's back is to the guy when he falls to Crowder's side.
And just before that we can see that the guy is yelling at the guy next to Crowder.
Crowder had nothing to do with his falling.

And at the point he fell, he obviously hit Crowder as we can hear Crowder exclaim, "you just assaulted me buddy!".
Click to expand...

Do you not see where I painstakingly took the time to explain it for feeble minds that it occurred "at the point he fell".
Which means it took place when he fell into his sight. Duh! Because that is how it happened in the video as all can see?

Why do you need this explained to you?
 
Last edited:
Catawba said:
You said, and I quote:





I call bull crap that the State police have made any such statement.

If you can prove its not BS, do it!
Click to expand...
:naughty
And as I have made it abundantly clear to you, because you fail at following along, I am not going to play fetch for you. That is your fault.
When engaging in discussion, it is your responsibility to stay up to date on that which has already been provided.
Not mine to keep you up to date.

Do you really not know that?

Your refusal to accept what I said, does not change the fact that it was reported that they said they are willing to investigate and Prosecute if Crowder comes forward, in any way shape or form.

Or is that just more that you do not know?
 
Last edited:
Excon said:
:naughty
And as I have made it abundantly clear to you, because you fail at following along, I am not going to play fetch for you. That is your fault.
When engaging in discussion, it is your responsibility to stay up to date on that which has already been provided.
Not mine to keep you up to date.

Do you really not know that?

Your refusal to accept what I said, does not change the fact that it was reported that they said they are willing to investigate and Prosecute if Crowder comes forward, in any way shape or form.

Or is that just more that you do not know?
Click to expand...



A simple, I can't produce the State Police statement I claimed, would have sufficed!
 
Excon said:
Ah. Do try and pay attention to what has been said. You obviously never watched the video because it appears you are speaking from your posterior.
Which can be the only explanation for you not understanding what was said, unless you simply didn't read it.
Or maybe it is a case of you reading what you want to be said, instead of what was actually said.
Truth be known - I have no idea why you would say such a ridiculous thing.

​

Do you not see where I painstakingly took the time to explain it for feeble minds that it occurred "at the point he fell".
Which means it took place when he fell into his sight. Duh! Because that is how it happened in the video as all can see?

Why do you need this explained to you?
Click to expand...

How is homey falling down an assault of Crowder?

And if his back is to him how is he speaking to him?
 
Catawba said:
You said, and I quote:


Originally Posted by Excon

We have video, and the State Police have already stated they are ready to Prosecute.
Click to expand...


I call bull crap that the State police have made any such statement.

If you can prove its not BS, do it!
Click to expand...


Well I did find this:

“There is video footage of him being assaulted. We don’t know who the suspect is, but we could do a several month investigation and find the suspect,” Inspector Gene Adamczyk, spokesperson for the state police, told TPM on Thursday. “But if Mr. Crowder is not going to prosecute, we have not gained anything, we’ve wasted resources.”

So far Crowder has not sought out police help after he was hit. Adamczyk pointed out he’s instead turned the video into a national conservative media tour.

“I saw Mr. Crowder’s interview on Sean Hannity and he wants to have an MMA-sanctioned fight with this individual,” he said. Crowder told Hannity that if the suspect doesn’t come forward for the MMA fight (which he said would be held for charity), Crowder would “press charges.”

Adamczyk did not sound impressed by the plan.

“You can’t leverage the law for personal gain,” he said. “Either you’re the victim, or you’re not. So if he’s the victim of an assault, and he wants to file a complaint, we will definitely investigate it.”

Michigan Police Question Fox News Contributor’s ‘Punch’ Story | TPMDC
Click to expand...

Kinda of an odd stunt for a serious journalist to play:thinking
 
Catawba said:
A simple, I can't produce the State Police statement I claimed, would have sufficed!
Click to expand...
:naughty No it woulds not have sufficed because I can produce it.
I am not because of what I already stated. Your failure to follow along.


And as I have made it abundantly clear to you, because you fail at following along, I am not going to play fetch for you. That is your fault.
When engaging in discussion, it is your responsibility to stay up to date on that which has already been provided.
Not mine to keep you up to date.

Do you really not know that?

Your refusal to accept what I said, does not change the fact that it was reported that they said they are willing to investigate and Prosecute if Crowder comes forward, in any way shape or form.

Or is that just more that you do not know?​
 
Excon said:
:naughty No it woulds not have sufficed because I can produce it.
I am not because of what I already stated. Your failure to follow along.

And as I have made it abundantly clear to you, because you fail at following along, I am not going to play fetch for you. That is your fault.
When engaging in discussion, it is your responsibility to stay up to date on that which has already been provided.
Not mine to keep you up to date.

Do you really not know that?

Your refusal to accept what I said, does not change the fact that it was reported that they said they are willing to investigate and Prosecute if Crowder comes forward, in any way shape or form.

Or is that just more that you do not know?​
Click to expand...


Apparently Crowder doesn't want to prosecute for some reason. And I doubt it is because he is nice guy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom