- Joined
- Sep 25, 2012
- Messages
- 7,908
- Reaction score
- 1,764
- Location
- Chicago
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Your assumption is incorrect either way.
There's no indication that the judge is progressive.
Look, I don't know what the political affiliation of the judge is - I can only assume.
As an individual who knows law, I can tell you that a "pro-choice" or "pro-life" license plate doesn't violate any persons rights and it certainly doesn't endorse any idea. With that said - I have no idea why the idea was shot down beyond the fact that another idiot judge denied the pro-choice movement to have their "pro-choice" plates.
IMO, both are stupid ideas considering (as I pointed out in a previous post) that one can just buy a bumper sticker or license plate liner that says "pro-life" or "pro-choice" so what the hell is the problem?